`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
` Civil Action No. 6:22-cv-31-ADA
`
`
` JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`FLYPSI, INC. (D/B/A FLYP),
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` vs.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OMNIBUS ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ DISPUTED MOTIONS IN LIMINE
`
`After considering briefing and holding oral arguments on January 17, 2024, the Court
`
`hereby enters its rulings on the following disputed Motions in Limine:
`
`Plaintiff Flypsi, Inc. (d/b/a Flyp)’s disputed Motions in Limine (Dkts. 223, 237):
`
`● Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 1 seeking to preclude any argument or evidence
`
`regarding inventorship or specific contributions of each inventor to the Patents-in-Suit
`
`is DENIED.
`
`● Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 4 seeking to preclude any argument or evidence that
`
`Flyp has the burden to establish the changes in Google Voice is DENIED. Google
`
`stipulates that it will not suggest to the jury that Flyp has the burden of proof on
`
`Google’s affirmative defense of prior use; however, Google shall be permitted to elicit
`
`testimony and argue that Flyp cannot identify changes to Google Voice during one or
`
`more particular time periods.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 261 Filed 01/31/24 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`● Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 8 seeking to preclude any argument or evidence
`
`regarding the familial or personal relationships of Flyp employees or agents, or any
`
`potential witness is GRANTED.
`
`● Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 10 seeking to preclude any argument or evidence
`
`regarding the circumstances of inventor Sunir Kochhar’s termination from Flyp is
`
`GRANTED to the extent it is offered as character evidence regarding Mr. Peter Rinfret.
`
`Defendant Google LLC’s disputed Motions in Limine (Dkts. 226, 235):
`
`● Defendant’s Motion in Limine No. 1 seeking to preclude any evidence, testimony, or
`
`argument regarding undisclosed facts underlying the Dialpad Agreement as to which
`
`Flyp invoked privilege is DENIED.
`
`● Defendant’s Motion in Limine No. 3 seeking to preclude any evidence, testimony, or
`
`argument regarding the November 2015 meeting is GRANTED.
`
`● Defendant’s Motion in Limine No. 4 seeking to preclude any evidence, testimony, or
`
`argument suggesting that Google Voice was considered by the U.S. Patent Office in
`
`connection with the Asserted Patents is DENIED.
`
`SIGNED this 31st day of January, 2024.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
