`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`FLYPSI, INC. (D/B/A FLYP),
`
`
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Case No. 6:22-CV-00031-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`AGREED ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY OF
`ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION
`
`1. PURPOSE
`
`This Order will govern discovery of electronically stored information (“ESI”) in the above-
`
`captioned cases as a supplement to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any other applicable
`
`orders and rules.
`
`2. COOPERATION
`
`The parties are aware of the importance the Court places on cooperation and commit to cooperate
`
`in good faith throughout the matter.
`
`3. PROPORTIONALITY
`
`Parties are expected to use reasonable, good faith and proportional efforts to preserve, identify
`
`and produce relevant information consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1)1. This includes
`
`identifying appropriate limits to discovery, identification of relevant subject matter, time periods
`
`for discovery, and other parameters to limit and guide preservation and discovery issues. A
`
`party’s meaningful compliance with this order and efforts to promote efficiency and reduce costs
`
`
`1 Information can originate in any form, including ESI and paper, and is not limited to information
`created or stored electronically.
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 2 of 9
`
`may be considered in cost-shifting determinations.
`
`4. COST-SHIFTING
`
`As in all cases, costs may be shifted for disproportionate ESI production requests pursuant
`
`to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. Likewise, a party’s nonresponsive or dilatory discovery
`
`tactics are cost-shifting considerations.
`
`5. LIAISON
`
`a)
`
`The parties have identified liaisons to each other who are and will be
`
`knowledgeable about and responsible for discussing their respective ESI. Each e-discovery
`
`liaison will be, or have access to those who are, knowledgeable about the technical aspects of e-
`
`discovery, including the location, nature, accessibility, format, collection, search methodologies,
`
`and production of ESI in this matter. The parties will rely on the liaisons, as needed, to confer
`
`about ESI and to help resolve disputes without court intervention.
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`Flypsi, Inc. appoints Danielle Sloan as its e-discovery liaison.
`
`Google LLC appoints Joshua Yin as its e-discovery liaison.
`
`6. PRESERVATION
`
`The parties have discussed their preservation obligations and needs and agree that
`
`preservation of potentially relevant ESI will be reasonable and proportionate. To reduce the costs
`
`and burdens of preservation and to ensure proper ESI is preserved, the parties agree that:
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`Only ESI created or received on or after January 1, 2011 will be preserved;
`
`The parties have discussed the types of ESI they believe should be preserved;
`
`The following data sources are not reasonably accessible because of undue
`
`burden or cost pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(B). ESI from these sources will be preserved
`
`pursuant to normal business retention, but not searched, reviewed, or produced:
`
`1. backup systems and/or tapes used for disaster recovery;
`
`2. systems, server, and network logs; and
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 3 of 9
`
`3. systems no longer in use that cannot be accessed.
`
`d)
`
`Among the sources of data the parties agree are not reasonably accessible, the
`
`parties agree not to preserve, search, or collect the following:
`
`1. voice messages
`
`2. information from handsets, mobile devices, personal digital assistants, and tablets
`that is duplicative of information that resides in a reasonably accessible data
`source;
`
`3. instant messaging and chat application data;
`
`4. automatically saved versions of documents and emails;
`
`5. video and audio recordings;
`
`6. deleted, slack, fragmented, or other data accessible only by forensics;
`
`7. random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other ephemeral data that are
`difficult to preserve without disabling the operating system;
`
`8. on-line access data such as temporary internet files, history, cache, cookies, and
`the like;
`
`9. dynamic fields of databases or log files that are not retained in the usual course
`of business; and
`
`10. data in metadata fields that are frequently updated automatically, such as last
`opened dates.
`
`7. SEARCH
`
`a)
`
`The parties agree that in responding to an initial Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 request, or
`
`earlier if appropriate, they will meet and confer about methods to search ESI (including the need
`
`to search email related ESI under the applicable provisions of the Court’s Order Governing
`
`Proceedings in Patent Cases) in order to identify ESI that is subject to production in discovery
`
`and filter out ESI that is not subject to discovery.
`
`b)
`
`Each party will use its best efforts to filter out common system files and
`
`application executable files by using a commercially reasonable hash identification process.
`
`Hash values that may be filtered out during this process are located in the National Software
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 4 of 9
`
`Reference Library (“NSRL”) NIST hash set list. Additional culling of file types based on file
`
`header information may include, but are not limited to: Application Package File, Backup Files,
`
`Batch Files, Binary Disc Image, C++ File Formats, Cascading Style Sheet, Configuration File,
`
`Database File, Dictionary Files, Dynamic Link Library, Event Log Files, Executable Files,
`
`Hypertext Cascading Stylesheet, Java Archive Files, JavaScript files, JavaScript Source Code
`
`and Class Files, Macintosh Resource Fork Files, MP3 Files, MP4 Files, Package Manager Files,
`
`Program Files, Program Installers, Python Script Files, Quicktime Files, Shell Script Files,
`
`System or Temporary Files, Thumbnail Cache Files, Troff Files, TrueType Font Files, Video
`
`Media Files, Waveform Audio File Format, Windows Cabinet File, Windows Command Files,
`
`Windows File Shortcut, Windows Help Files, Windows Metafiles and Enhanced Metafiles,
`
`Windows Spool Files, Windows System File. Source code files will be provided according to
`
`the Protective Order and not included in data productions.
`
`c)
`
`A party is required to produce only a single copy of a responsive document, and
`
`a party may de-duplicate responsive ESI.
`
`d)
`
`If applicable, no provision of this Order affects the inspection or production of
`
`source code which will be collected and made available consistent with the Protective Order
`
`governing this case.
`
`8. PRODUCTION FORMATS
`
`The parties agree to produce documents in the formats described in Appendix 1 to this
`
`Order. If particular documents warrant a different format, the parties will cooperate to arrange
`
`for the mutually acceptable production of such documents. The parties agree not to degrade the
`
`searchability of documents as part of the document production process.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 5 of 9
`
`9. DOCUMENTS PROTECTED FROM DISCOVERY
`
`a)
`
`Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the production of a privileged or work-product-
`
`protected document, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of privilege or protection
`
`from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. Disclosures among a
`
`party’s attorneys (including attorneys of third parties that share issues of common interest) of
`
`work product or other communications relating to issues of common interest shall not affect or
`
`be deemed a waiver of any applicable privilege or protection from disclosure. For example, the
`
`mere production of privileged or work-product-protected documents in this case as part of a mass
`
`production is not itself a waiver in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. A
`
`producing party may assert privilege or protection over produced documents at any time by
`
`notifying the receiving party in writing of the assertion of privilege or protection. Information
`
`that contains privileged matter or attorney work product shall be returned immediately if such
`
`information appears on its face to have been inadvertently produced or if requested.
`
`b)
`
`Communications that: (1) concern a case; (2) involve trial counsel in that case;
`
`and (3) post-date the filing of the complaint in that case need not be placed on a privilege log.
`
`Such post-date communications may be identified on a privilege log by category, rather than
`
`individually, if appropriate.
`
`c)
`
`Activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve information are
`
`protected from discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(A) and (B).
`
`d)
`
`Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to require disclosure of irrelevant
`
`information or relevant information protected by the attorney-client privilege, work-product
`
`doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or immunity. The parties do not waive any objections
`
`to the production, discoverability, admissibility, or confidentiality of documents and ESI.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 6 of 9
`
`10. MODIFICATION
`
`This Agreed Order may be modified by an Agreed Order of the parties or by the Court
`
`for good cause shown. Any such modified Agreed Order will be titled sequentially as follows,
`
`“First Modified Agreed Order re: Discovery of Electronically Stored Information,” and each
`
`modified Agreed Order will supersede the previous Agreed Order.
`
`
`IT IS SO AGREED, through Counsel of Record.
`
`
`Dated: September 7, 2022
`
`/s/ Michael A. Bittner_______________________
`
`
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Flypsi, Inc. (d/b/a Flyp)
`
`Dated: September 7, 2022
`
`/s/ Paige Arnette Amstutz__________________
`
`
`
`Counsel for Defendant Google LLC
`
`
`IT IS ORDERED that the foregoing Agreed Order Regarding Discovery of Electronically
`
`Stored Information is approved.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: ______________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________________________________
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 7 of 9
`
`APPENDIX 1
`PRODUCTION FORMAT AND METADATA
`
`1. Production Components. Productions shall include single page TIFFs, Text Files, and
`ASCII delimited metadata file (.txt, .dat, or .csv), and an image load file that can be
`loaded into commercially acceptable production software (e.g., Concordance).
`
`2. Image Load File shall contain the following comma-delimited fields: BEGBATES,
`VOLUME, IMAGE FILE PATH, DOCUMENT BREAK, FOLDER BREAK, BOX
`BREAK, PAGE COUNT.
`
`3. Metadata Fields and Metadata File. Each of the metadata and coding fields set forth
`below that can be extracted shall be produced for each document. The parties are not
`obligated to populate manually any of the fields below if such fields cannot be extracted
`from a document. The metadata file shall be delimited according to the following
`characters:
`
`● Delimiter = ¶ (ASCII:020)
`
`● Text-Qualifier = þ (ASCII:254)
`
`● New Line = ® (ASCII:174)
`
`● Multi-value delimiter - ; (ASCII Code 059)
`
`Field Name
`
`BEGBATES
`
`ENDBATES
`
`TITLE
`
`FILENAME
`
`DATEMOD
`
`DATECREATED
`
`NATIVELINK
`
`TEXTLINK
`
`
`
`Field Description
`
`Beginning Bates number as stamped on the production image
`
`Ending Bates number as stamped on the production image
`
`Title from properties of document
`
`Filename of an electronic document (Edoc or attachment)
`
`Date an electronic document was last modified or created
`(format: MM/DD/YYYY) (Edoc or attachment)
`Date the document was created (format: MM/DD/YYYY)
`(Edoc or attachment)
`Native File Link (Native Files only)
`
`Link to text files
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 8 of 9
`
`4. TIFFs. Documents that exist only in hard copy format shall be scanned and produced as
`TIFFs. Unless excepted below, documents that exist as ESI shall be converted and
`produced as TIFFs. Unless excepted below, single page Group IV TIFFs should be
`provided, at least 300 dots per inch (dpi) for all documents. Each TIFF image shall be
`named according to a unique corresponding Bates number associated with the document.
`Each image shall be branded according to the Bates number and the agreed upon
`confidentiality designation. Original document orientation should be maintained (i.e.,
`portrait to portrait and landscape to landscape). TIFFs shall show all text and images that
`would be visible to a user of the hard copy documents.
`
`5. Text Files. A single multi-page text file shall be provided for each document, and the
`filename should match its respective TIFF filename. A commercially acceptable
`technology for optical character recognition “OCR” shall be used for all scanned, hard
`copy documents. When possible, the text of native files should be extracted directly from
`the native file. Text files will not contain the redacted portions of the documents, and
`OCR text files will be substituted instead of extracted text files for redacted documents.
`All documents shall be produced with a link in the TextLink field.
`
`6. Image Load Files / Data Load Files. Each TIFF in a production must be referenced in
`the corresponding image load file. The total number of documents referenced in a
`production’s data load file should match the total number of designated document breaks
`in the Image Load file(s) in the production. The total number of pages referenced in a
`production’s image load file should match the total number of TIFF files in the
`production. The total number of documents in a production should match the total
`number of records in the data load file.
`
`7. Bates Numbering. All images must be assigned a unique Bates number that is sequential
`within a given document and across the production sets.
`
`8. Confidentiality Designation. Responsive documents in TIFF format will be stamped
`with the appropriate confidentiality designations in accordance with the Protective Order
`in this matter. Each responsive document produced in native format will have its
`confidentiality designation identified in the filename of the native file.
`
`9. Redaction Of Information. If documents are produced containing redacted information,
`an electronic copy of the original, unredacted data shall be securely preserved in such a
`manner so as to preserve without modification, alteration or addition the content of such
`data including any metadata therein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 9 of 9
`
`10. Native Files. Spreadsheets (e.g., MS Excel, Google Sheets) and delimited text files (e.g.,
`comma-separated value (.csv) files and tab-separated value (.tsv) files) shall be produced
`in either their native format or MS Excel. TIFF images need not be produced unless the
`files have been redacted, in which instance such files shall be produced in TIFF with
`OCR Text Files. A TIFF placeholder indicating that the document was provided in native
`format should accompany the database record. If a file has been redacted, TIFF images
`and OCR text of the redacted document will suffice in lieu of a native file and extracted
`text.
`
`11. Proprietary Files. To the extent a response to discovery requires production of ESI
`accessible only through proprietary software, the parties should continue to preserve each
`version of such information. The parties shall meet and confer to finalize the appropriate
`production format.
`
`12. Production Media. Documents shall be encrypted and produced on external hard drives,
`readily accessible computer(s) or other electronic media (“Production Media”). Each
`piece of Production Media shall identify a production number corresponding to the
`production volume (e.g., “VOL001,” “VOL002”), as well as the volume of the material
`in that production (e.g., “-001,” “-002”). Each piece of Production Media shall also
`identify: (1) the producing party’s name; (2) the production date; and (3) the Bates
`Number range of the materials contained on the Production Media.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`