throbber
Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 1 of 9
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`FLYPSI, INC. (D/B/A FLYP),
`
`
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`










`
`Case No. 6:22-CV-00031-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`AGREED ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY OF
`ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION
`
`1. PURPOSE
`
`This Order will govern discovery of electronically stored information (“ESI”) in the above-
`
`captioned cases as a supplement to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any other applicable
`
`orders and rules.
`
`2. COOPERATION
`
`The parties are aware of the importance the Court places on cooperation and commit to cooperate
`
`in good faith throughout the matter.
`
`3. PROPORTIONALITY
`
`Parties are expected to use reasonable, good faith and proportional efforts to preserve, identify
`
`and produce relevant information consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1)1. This includes
`
`identifying appropriate limits to discovery, identification of relevant subject matter, time periods
`
`for discovery, and other parameters to limit and guide preservation and discovery issues. A
`
`party’s meaningful compliance with this order and efforts to promote efficiency and reduce costs
`
`
`1 Information can originate in any form, including ESI and paper, and is not limited to information
`created or stored electronically.
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 2 of 9
`
`may be considered in cost-shifting determinations.
`
`4. COST-SHIFTING
`
`As in all cases, costs may be shifted for disproportionate ESI production requests pursuant
`
`to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. Likewise, a party’s nonresponsive or dilatory discovery
`
`tactics are cost-shifting considerations.
`
`5. LIAISON
`
`a)
`
`The parties have identified liaisons to each other who are and will be
`
`knowledgeable about and responsible for discussing their respective ESI. Each e-discovery
`
`liaison will be, or have access to those who are, knowledgeable about the technical aspects of e-
`
`discovery, including the location, nature, accessibility, format, collection, search methodologies,
`
`and production of ESI in this matter. The parties will rely on the liaisons, as needed, to confer
`
`about ESI and to help resolve disputes without court intervention.
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`Flypsi, Inc. appoints Danielle Sloan as its e-discovery liaison.
`
`Google LLC appoints Joshua Yin as its e-discovery liaison.
`
`6. PRESERVATION
`
`The parties have discussed their preservation obligations and needs and agree that
`
`preservation of potentially relevant ESI will be reasonable and proportionate. To reduce the costs
`
`and burdens of preservation and to ensure proper ESI is preserved, the parties agree that:
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`Only ESI created or received on or after January 1, 2011 will be preserved;
`
`The parties have discussed the types of ESI they believe should be preserved;
`
`The following data sources are not reasonably accessible because of undue
`
`burden or cost pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(B). ESI from these sources will be preserved
`
`pursuant to normal business retention, but not searched, reviewed, or produced:
`
`1. backup systems and/or tapes used for disaster recovery;
`
`2. systems, server, and network logs; and
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 3 of 9
`
`3. systems no longer in use that cannot be accessed.
`
`d)
`
`Among the sources of data the parties agree are not reasonably accessible, the
`
`parties agree not to preserve, search, or collect the following:
`
`1. voice messages
`
`2. information from handsets, mobile devices, personal digital assistants, and tablets
`that is duplicative of information that resides in a reasonably accessible data
`source;
`
`3. instant messaging and chat application data;
`
`4. automatically saved versions of documents and emails;
`
`5. video and audio recordings;
`
`6. deleted, slack, fragmented, or other data accessible only by forensics;
`
`7. random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other ephemeral data that are
`difficult to preserve without disabling the operating system;
`
`8. on-line access data such as temporary internet files, history, cache, cookies, and
`the like;
`
`9. dynamic fields of databases or log files that are not retained in the usual course
`of business; and
`
`10. data in metadata fields that are frequently updated automatically, such as last
`opened dates.
`
`7. SEARCH
`
`a)
`
`The parties agree that in responding to an initial Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 request, or
`
`earlier if appropriate, they will meet and confer about methods to search ESI (including the need
`
`to search email related ESI under the applicable provisions of the Court’s Order Governing
`
`Proceedings in Patent Cases) in order to identify ESI that is subject to production in discovery
`
`and filter out ESI that is not subject to discovery.
`
`b)
`
`Each party will use its best efforts to filter out common system files and
`
`application executable files by using a commercially reasonable hash identification process.
`
`Hash values that may be filtered out during this process are located in the National Software
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 4 of 9
`
`Reference Library (“NSRL”) NIST hash set list. Additional culling of file types based on file
`
`header information may include, but are not limited to: Application Package File, Backup Files,
`
`Batch Files, Binary Disc Image, C++ File Formats, Cascading Style Sheet, Configuration File,
`
`Database File, Dictionary Files, Dynamic Link Library, Event Log Files, Executable Files,
`
`Hypertext Cascading Stylesheet, Java Archive Files, JavaScript files, JavaScript Source Code
`
`and Class Files, Macintosh Resource Fork Files, MP3 Files, MP4 Files, Package Manager Files,
`
`Program Files, Program Installers, Python Script Files, Quicktime Files, Shell Script Files,
`
`System or Temporary Files, Thumbnail Cache Files, Troff Files, TrueType Font Files, Video
`
`Media Files, Waveform Audio File Format, Windows Cabinet File, Windows Command Files,
`
`Windows File Shortcut, Windows Help Files, Windows Metafiles and Enhanced Metafiles,
`
`Windows Spool Files, Windows System File. Source code files will be provided according to
`
`the Protective Order and not included in data productions.
`
`c)
`
`A party is required to produce only a single copy of a responsive document, and
`
`a party may de-duplicate responsive ESI.
`
`d)
`
`If applicable, no provision of this Order affects the inspection or production of
`
`source code which will be collected and made available consistent with the Protective Order
`
`governing this case.
`
`8. PRODUCTION FORMATS
`
`The parties agree to produce documents in the formats described in Appendix 1 to this
`
`Order. If particular documents warrant a different format, the parties will cooperate to arrange
`
`for the mutually acceptable production of such documents. The parties agree not to degrade the
`
`searchability of documents as part of the document production process.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 5 of 9
`
`9. DOCUMENTS PROTECTED FROM DISCOVERY
`
`a)
`
`Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the production of a privileged or work-product-
`
`protected document, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of privilege or protection
`
`from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. Disclosures among a
`
`party’s attorneys (including attorneys of third parties that share issues of common interest) of
`
`work product or other communications relating to issues of common interest shall not affect or
`
`be deemed a waiver of any applicable privilege or protection from disclosure. For example, the
`
`mere production of privileged or work-product-protected documents in this case as part of a mass
`
`production is not itself a waiver in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. A
`
`producing party may assert privilege or protection over produced documents at any time by
`
`notifying the receiving party in writing of the assertion of privilege or protection. Information
`
`that contains privileged matter or attorney work product shall be returned immediately if such
`
`information appears on its face to have been inadvertently produced or if requested.
`
`b)
`
`Communications that: (1) concern a case; (2) involve trial counsel in that case;
`
`and (3) post-date the filing of the complaint in that case need not be placed on a privilege log.
`
`Such post-date communications may be identified on a privilege log by category, rather than
`
`individually, if appropriate.
`
`c)
`
`Activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve information are
`
`protected from discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(A) and (B).
`
`d)
`
`Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to require disclosure of irrelevant
`
`information or relevant information protected by the attorney-client privilege, work-product
`
`doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or immunity. The parties do not waive any objections
`
`to the production, discoverability, admissibility, or confidentiality of documents and ESI.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 6 of 9
`
`10. MODIFICATION
`
`This Agreed Order may be modified by an Agreed Order of the parties or by the Court
`
`for good cause shown. Any such modified Agreed Order will be titled sequentially as follows,
`
`“First Modified Agreed Order re: Discovery of Electronically Stored Information,” and each
`
`modified Agreed Order will supersede the previous Agreed Order.
`
`
`IT IS SO AGREED, through Counsel of Record.
`
`
`Dated: September 7, 2022
`
`/s/ Michael A. Bittner_______________________
`
`
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Flypsi, Inc. (d/b/a Flyp)
`
`Dated: September 7, 2022
`
`/s/ Paige Arnette Amstutz__________________
`
`
`
`Counsel for Defendant Google LLC
`
`
`IT IS ORDERED that the foregoing Agreed Order Regarding Discovery of Electronically
`
`Stored Information is approved.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: ______________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________________________________
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 7 of 9
`
`APPENDIX 1
`PRODUCTION FORMAT AND METADATA
`
`1. Production Components. Productions shall include single page TIFFs, Text Files, and
`ASCII delimited metadata file (.txt, .dat, or .csv), and an image load file that can be
`loaded into commercially acceptable production software (e.g., Concordance).
`
`2. Image Load File shall contain the following comma-delimited fields: BEGBATES,
`VOLUME, IMAGE FILE PATH, DOCUMENT BREAK, FOLDER BREAK, BOX
`BREAK, PAGE COUNT.
`
`3. Metadata Fields and Metadata File. Each of the metadata and coding fields set forth
`below that can be extracted shall be produced for each document. The parties are not
`obligated to populate manually any of the fields below if such fields cannot be extracted
`from a document. The metadata file shall be delimited according to the following
`characters:
`
`● Delimiter = ¶ (ASCII:020)
`
`● Text-Qualifier = þ (ASCII:254)
`
`● New Line = ® (ASCII:174)
`
`● Multi-value delimiter - ; (ASCII Code 059)
`
`Field Name
`
`BEGBATES
`
`ENDBATES
`
`TITLE
`
`FILENAME
`
`DATEMOD
`
`DATECREATED
`
`NATIVELINK
`
`TEXTLINK
`
`
`
`Field Description
`
`Beginning Bates number as stamped on the production image
`
`Ending Bates number as stamped on the production image
`
`Title from properties of document
`
`Filename of an electronic document (Edoc or attachment)
`
`Date an electronic document was last modified or created
`(format: MM/DD/YYYY) (Edoc or attachment)
`Date the document was created (format: MM/DD/YYYY)
`(Edoc or attachment)
`Native File Link (Native Files only)
`
`Link to text files
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 8 of 9
`
`4. TIFFs. Documents that exist only in hard copy format shall be scanned and produced as
`TIFFs. Unless excepted below, documents that exist as ESI shall be converted and
`produced as TIFFs. Unless excepted below, single page Group IV TIFFs should be
`provided, at least 300 dots per inch (dpi) for all documents. Each TIFF image shall be
`named according to a unique corresponding Bates number associated with the document.
`Each image shall be branded according to the Bates number and the agreed upon
`confidentiality designation. Original document orientation should be maintained (i.e.,
`portrait to portrait and landscape to landscape). TIFFs shall show all text and images that
`would be visible to a user of the hard copy documents.
`
`5. Text Files. A single multi-page text file shall be provided for each document, and the
`filename should match its respective TIFF filename. A commercially acceptable
`technology for optical character recognition “OCR” shall be used for all scanned, hard
`copy documents. When possible, the text of native files should be extracted directly from
`the native file. Text files will not contain the redacted portions of the documents, and
`OCR text files will be substituted instead of extracted text files for redacted documents.
`All documents shall be produced with a link in the TextLink field.
`
`6. Image Load Files / Data Load Files. Each TIFF in a production must be referenced in
`the corresponding image load file. The total number of documents referenced in a
`production’s data load file should match the total number of designated document breaks
`in the Image Load file(s) in the production. The total number of pages referenced in a
`production’s image load file should match the total number of TIFF files in the
`production. The total number of documents in a production should match the total
`number of records in the data load file.
`
`7. Bates Numbering. All images must be assigned a unique Bates number that is sequential
`within a given document and across the production sets.
`
`8. Confidentiality Designation. Responsive documents in TIFF format will be stamped
`with the appropriate confidentiality designations in accordance with the Protective Order
`in this matter. Each responsive document produced in native format will have its
`confidentiality designation identified in the filename of the native file.
`
`9. Redaction Of Information. If documents are produced containing redacted information,
`an electronic copy of the original, unredacted data shall be securely preserved in such a
`manner so as to preserve without modification, alteration or addition the content of such
`data including any metadata therein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00031-ADA Document 51-1 Filed 09/07/22 Page 9 of 9
`
`10. Native Files. Spreadsheets (e.g., MS Excel, Google Sheets) and delimited text files (e.g.,
`comma-separated value (.csv) files and tab-separated value (.tsv) files) shall be produced
`in either their native format or MS Excel. TIFF images need not be produced unless the
`files have been redacted, in which instance such files shall be produced in TIFF with
`OCR Text Files. A TIFF placeholder indicating that the document was provided in native
`format should accompany the database record. If a file has been redacted, TIFF images
`and OCR text of the redacted document will suffice in lieu of a native file and extracted
`text.
`
`11. Proprietary Files. To the extent a response to discovery requires production of ESI
`accessible only through proprietary software, the parties should continue to preserve each
`version of such information. The parties shall meet and confer to finalize the appropriate
`production format.
`
`12. Production Media. Documents shall be encrypted and produced on external hard drives,
`readily accessible computer(s) or other electronic media (“Production Media”). Each
`piece of Production Media shall identify a production number corresponding to the
`production volume (e.g., “VOL001,” “VOL002”), as well as the volume of the material
`in that production (e.g., “-001,” “-002”). Each piece of Production Media shall also
`identify: (1) the producing party’s name; (2) the production date; and (3) the Bates
`Number range of the materials contained on the Production Media.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket