throbber
Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 1 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 1 of 19
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`6:22-cv-1316
`6:22-cv-1316
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 2 of 19
`eeNTT TAA
`
`US010465445B2
`
`a2) United States Patent
`US 10,465,445 B2
`(10) Patent No.:
`
`(45) Date of Patent: Nov. 5, 2019
`Getzlafet al.
`
`(54)
`
`(71)
`
`(72)
`
`CASING FLOAT TOOL
`
`Applicant: NCS Multistage Inc., Calgary, Alberta
`(CA)
`
`Inventors: Donald Getzlaf, Calgary (CA); Marty
`Stromquist, Calgary (CA); John
`Ravensbergen, DeWinton (CA); David
`Devlin, Calgary (CA); Douglas
`Braden, Calgary (CA); Travis Harris,
`Houston, TX (US)
`
`(73)
`
`Assignee: NCS MULTISTAGE INC., Calgary,
`Alberta (CA)
`
`(*)
`
`Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`(21)
`
`Appl. No.: 15/919,370
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Mar.13, 2018
`
`(65)
`
`(60)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2018/0202260 Al
`
`Jul. 19, 2018
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`Continuation of application No. 15/421,222, filed on
`Jan. 31, 2017, which is a division of application No.
`(Continued)
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`
`E21B 7/20
`E21B 33/14
`
`(52)
`
`USS. Cl.
`
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`(Continued)
`
`CPC wees E21B 7/20 (2013.01); E21B 17/08
`(2013.01); E21B 17/14 (2013.01); E21B 21/10
`(2013.01);
`
`(58) Field of Classification Search
`CPC wee E21B 7/20; E21B 17/14; E21B 33/146
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2,008,818 A
`2,117,318 A
`
`7/1935 Corbett
`5/1938 Hanes
`(Continued)
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Rogers, H. E., Bolado, D. L., & Sullaway, B. L. (Jan. 1, 1998).
`Buoyancy Assist Extends Casing Reach in Horizontal Wells. Soci-
`ety of Petroleum Engineers. (Year: 1998).*
`
`Primary Examiner — Kristyn A Hall
`Assistant Examiner — Tara E Schimpf
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A rupture disc assembly and a float tool incorporating the
`rupture disc assembly is disclosed. The rupture disc assem-
`bly may include a rupture disc assembly comprising a
`rupture disc, an upper tubular portion and a lower tubular
`portion, and a securing mechanism for holding the rupture
`disc between the upper and lowertubular portions. A float
`tool for creating a buoyant chamber in a casing string may
`include the rupture disc assembly and a sealing device for
`sealing the lower end of the casing string, the buoyant,
`sealed chamber may becreated there between. In operation,
`applied fluid pressure causes the rupture disc to move
`downward. The rupture disc may be shattered by contact
`with a surface on the lower tubular portion. Full casing
`internal diameter may be restored in the region where the
`rupture disc formerly sealed the casing.
`
`(Continued)
`
`57 Claims, 7 Drawing Sheets
`
`
` :
`tht SSE<
`
`KO
`
`-58
`
`247227 24°60 *28
`
`$39
`
`~26
`
`t56
`
`“14
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 3 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 3 of 19
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`Page 2
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`*A
`
`A AAA
`
`*®
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`(56)
`
`13/930,683, filed on Jun. 28, 2013, now Pat. No.
`9,593,542.
`
`(60)
`
`Provisional application No. 61/761,070, filed on Feb.
`5, 2013.
`
`3,779,263
`3,831,680
`
`5,479,986
`5,829,526
`5,924,696
`
`12/1973
`8/1974
`
`1/1996
`11/1998
`7/1999
`
`8/2006
`1/2010
`2/2010
`7/2010
`4/2013
`5/2008
`
`Edwards
`Edwards 0... cee E21B 21/10
`166/311
`
`Gano
`Rogers
`Frazier oo. E21B 34/063
`138/90
`
`Williams
`Vert et al.
`Ammal
`Vert et al.
`Schultz et al.
`Keller wees E21B 34/06
`166/380
`ELvin vice eceeceeeeenees E21B 7/061
`166/382
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`
`E21B 21/10
`E21B 17/14
`E21B 34/06
`E21B 17/08
`
`(52)
`
`US. Cl.
`
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`
`7,090,027
`7,640,984
`7,661,480
`7,757,764
`8,424,605
`2008/0115942
`
`Bl
`B2
`B2
`B2
`Bl
`Al*
`
`2011/0253387
`
`Al*
`
`10/2011
`
`CPC wee £21B 33/14 (2013.01); E21B 33/146
`(2013.01); E21B 34/063 (2013.01)
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 4 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 4 of 19
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 2019
`
`Sheet 1 of 7
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 5 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page5of 19
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 2019
`
`Sheet 2 of 7
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`16
`
`20
`
`(24729 505527,-44_-18
`
`24s
`
`22~
`
`FIG.2
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 6 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 6 of 19
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 2019
`
`Sheet 3 of 7
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`
`
`FIG.3
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 7 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 7 of 19
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 2019
`
`Sheet 4 of 7
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`FIG.4C
`
`
`
`FIG.4A
`
`FIG.4B
`
`40
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 8 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page8of 19
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 2019
`
`Sheet 5 of 7
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`
`
`FIG.5
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 9 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 9 of 19
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 2019
`
`Sheet 6 of 7
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 10 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 10 of 19
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 2019
`
`Sheet 7 of 7
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG.7
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 11 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 11 of 19
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`2
`BRIEF SUMMARY
`
`1
`CASING FLOAT TOOL
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser.
`No. 15/421,222 filed on Jan. 31, 2017, which is a division of
`USS. application Ser. No. 13/930,683 filed on Jun. 28, 2013,
`now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,593,542 which claims the
`benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/761,070 filed
`on Feb. 5, 2013,
`the disclosures of which are hereby
`incorporated by reference in their entireties.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates to a method and apparatus for
`sealing well casings.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`In manywells, it may be difficult to run the casing to great
`depths becausefriction between the wellbore and the casing
`often results in a substantial amount of drag. This is par-
`ticularly true in horizontal and/or deviated wells. In some
`cases, the drag on the casing can exceedthe available weight
`in the vertical section of the wellbore. If there is insufficient
`
`it may be
`weight in the vertical portion of the wellbore,
`difficult or impossible to overcome drag in the wellbore.
`Various attempts have been made to overcome this drag
`and achieve greater well depths and/or to achieve a hori-
`zontal well. For example, techniquesto alter wellbore geom-
`etry are available, but these techniques can be time-consum-
`ing and expensive. Techniques to lighten or “float” the
`casing have been used to extend the depth of well. For
`example, there exists techniques in which the ends of a
`casing string portion are plugged, the plugged portion is
`filled with a low density, miscible fluid to provide a buoyant
`force. After the pluggedportionis placed in the wellbore, the
`plugs mustbe drilled out, and the low density miscible fluid
`is forced out into the wellbore. The extra step of drilling out
`increases completion time. Someflotation devices require a
`packer to seal the casing above the air chamber. In these
`cases, the chamberis sealed at its upper end by a packer. The
`packer may be removed from the casing string using a
`conventional drill-type workstring, for example.
`In manycasing float techniques and devices, it may not be
`possible to achieve full casing ID (Gnside diameter) follow-
`ing the opening ofthe air chamber.It is desirable to achieve
`full casing ID so that downhole tools can be conveyedto this
`region of the casing string and so that operations, such as
`cementing can be easily carried out using conventional
`ball-drop techniques, or other conventional
`techniques.
`Also, many float devices require the use of specialized float
`shoes and/or float collars.
`Tt would be desirable to have a flotation chamber (also
`referred to herein as a “float chamber” or “buoyant cham-
`ber”) which is easy and relatively inexpensive to install on
`a casing string and which can be used with conventional
`float equipment such as float shoes and float collars, and
`with conventional equipment such as landing collars and
`cementing plugs. Further, it would be desirable if the parts
`of the float chamber could be easily removed from the
`wellbore and/or that the removal could result in full casing
`ID so that various downhole operations could be readily
`performed following removal or opening of the buoyant
`chamber.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Generally, this disclosure relates to an improved rupture
`disc assembly and improved rupture disc within the assem-
`bly wherein the rupture disc, when installed in the wellbore,
`can be ruptured by engagement with an impact surface of a
`tubular once a rupturing force is applied to the disc, such as
`by hydraulic fluid under pressure. The disc can be impelled
`to impact against this impact surface, and ruptureas a result.
`For example, the disc may be engaged within the casing
`string by a securing mechanism, which maybea shear ring.
`Whenfreed from the constraints of the securing mechanism,
`the disc shatters against an impact surface within the casing
`string (e.g. a surface of a tubular). Hydraulic pressure does
`not cause rupture ofthe disc all by itself. Rather, hydraulic
`pressure causes disruption or shearing of the securing
`mechanism, such that
`the rupture disc is shattered by
`engagement against an impact surface within the casing
`string. The hydraulic pressure required to cause disruption of
`the securing mechanism is less than the hydraulic pressure
`that would normally be required to break the rupture disc.
`The engagementof the disc against the impact surface (the
`disc being impelled against the impact surface) allows the
`disc to rupture at lower pressure than would generally be
`required if hydraulic pressure alone was the sole mechanism
`for rupturing the disc, thereby allowing less hydraulic pres-
`sure to be required for the disc to be ruptured. Also, as will
`be described below, this allows the disc to be broken into
`suitably-sized pieces that will not affect wellbore equipment
`such as float devices.
`
`There is no need to send weights, sharp objects or other
`devices(e.g. drop bars or sinker bars) downthe casing string
`to break the rupture disc. Nor is there a need for complicated
`tubular arrangements, such as sliding sleeves to break the
`rupture disc. Such sleeves do not tend to break the disc into
`sufficiently small pieces. In the present arrangement, the
`rupture disc and rupture disc assembly can be so arranged
`that the rupture disc gets broken in sufliciently small pieces
`that the disc pieces can be removed by fiuid circulation,
`without damaging the casing string. In addition, full casing
`ID (inside diameter) is restored after the rupture disc is
`broken, so that there is no need to drill out any part of the
`device. This full casing ID is useful for use in ball-drop
`systems. Once the disc has ruptured, normal operations,
`such as cementing, may be performed. The device is
`straight-forward to install, avoids the cost and complexity of
`many known casing flotation methods and devices, and
`decreases completion time.
`According to one aspect, the rupture disc assembly com-
`prises an upper tubular member, and a lower tubular member
`coupled with the upper tubular member. The rupture disc is
`held in sealing engagement between the upper tubular
`memberandthe lower tubular memberby a securing mecha-
`nism. The rupture disc is secured above or within the lower
`tubular member such that the rupture disc can move down-
`ward into a constricted area of the lower tubular member in
`
`response to hydraulic fluid pressure, and rupture as a result
`of the impact against the lower tubular member.
`In one embodiment, the securing mechanism generally
`provides a convenient meansto fluidically seal the rupture
`disc within the casing string, and essentially, to facilitate
`rupturing of the disc, by the mechanisms described herein.
`In one example, the securing mechanism is a shearring, the
`shear ring having a continuous side surface and a circum-
`ferential aperture. The lower circumferential edge of the
`shear ring includes a plurality of tabs inwardly extending
`into the aperture. Generally, the threshold shearing pressure
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 12 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 12 of 19
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`3
`ofthe tabs is less than the rupture burst pressure of the disc
`(e.g. the pressure at which hydraulic pressure alone causes
`rupture of the disc), so that the tabs are sheared before the
`disc is shattered. The shearing allows sudden or rapid free
`movement of the disc in the direction of the lower tubular
`
`4
`tubing either closer or farther from the wellhead and that
`various embodiments of the present invention may be uti-
`lized in various orientations, such as inclined, deviated,
`horizontal, vertical, etc.
`Float Tool
`
`member, so that the disc can be shattered by impact.
`It is desirable for the rupture disc to be shattered into
`sufficiently small pieces that the shattered pieces do not
`damage the casing string, and so that the pieces do not clog
`equipment(such as the float shoe) within the casing string.
`To accomplish this, various configurations of the rupture
`disc may be employed. For example, the rupture disc may
`have a pattern of grooves etched on the outer surface of the
`dome, the grooves providing lines of weakness to facilitate
`breakageof the disc into suitably-sized pieces. The thickness
`of the rupture disc may also be such as to improve the
`breakability characteristics. The small size of the pieces
`allow the rupture disc assembly to be used with ball-drop
`systems (typically, the smallest ball drop is less than one
`inch).
`According to one embodiment, the float tool may further
`comprise a debris catcher disposed on the casing string
`downhole of the disc to catch the disc pieces after the disc
`has been broken.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Referring to the drawings, FIG. 1 shows an embodiment
`of a float tool, generally designated by the numeral 90, after
`the float tool has been run into wellbore 92. Float tool 90 is
`installed within casing string 94. An annulus 110 may be
`defined between the casing and the wellbore 92.
`According to this embodiment, float tool 90 includes a
`rupture disc assembly 10. In the illustrated embodiment,
`rupture disc assembly 10 is installed in the vertical portion
`130 of wellbore 92, proximal to the bend 150 leading to the
`horizontal portion 140 of the wellbore. Variations in the
`placement of the rupture disc assembly are possible. Gen-
`erally, the rupture disc assembly should be installed such to
`maximize vertical weight on the casing string, while mini-
`mizing horizontal weight. Rupture disc assembly 10 forms
`a temporary isolation barrier, isolating a fluid-filled, upper
`section ofthe string 93 from a sealed, buoyant chamber 120
`formed in the string between the rupture disc assembly 10
`and a sealing device, such as a float shoe 96 disposed at the
`lower end ofthe casing string.
`Float shoe 96 forms the lower boundary of buoyant
`Various embodiments include an improved float tool for
`chamber 120. As will be appreciated, an alternative float
`creating a buoyant chamber in a casing string, wherein the
`device, such asafloat collar, may be used as a substitute for
`float tool comprises the above-described rupture disc assem-
`float shoe 96, or may be used in addition to float shoe 96.
`bly; a methodthat utilizes the present rupture disc assembly
`Float shoes, float collars and similar devices are herein
`to first seal, and then unseal, a well casing; a method that
`referred to as “float devices”. In the illustrated embodiment,
`utilizes the present rupture disc assembly as part of the
`both a float shoe 96 and float collar 98 are included. Float
`installation of a casing; a method that utilizes the present
`rupture disc assembly as part of the running in of a casing
`string into a wellbore.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL
`
`VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)
`
`FIG.1 is a cross-sectional view of a float tool according
`to one embodiment installed within a casing string in a
`wellbore having both vertical and horizontal portions.
`FIG.2 is a cross-sectional view of a rupture disc assembly
`according to an embodimentthat is adapted for installation
`in a casing string.
`FIG. 3 is schematic, perspective view of a rupture disc
`assembly according to one embodiment.
`FIG. 4A is an end view of a shear ring according to one
`embodiment.
`
`FIG.4Bis a sectional view of a rupture disc holder with
`a shear ring taken through line A-A in FIG. 4A.
`FIG. 4C is an enlarged view of a portion of two tabs on
`the shear ring shown in FIG. 4A.
`FIG.5 is a perspective view of the rupture disc according
`to one embodiment, showing the surface etched in a grid-
`like pattern.
`FIG. 6 is a schematic drawing of an etched rupture disc
`within a shear ring.
`FIG.7 is a perspective view of a debris catcher according
`to one embodimentthat is adapted forinstallation in a casing
`string.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`In the following description, directional terms such as
`“above”, “below”, “upper”, “lower”, “uphole”, “downhole”,
`etc. are used for convenience in referring to the accompa-
`nying drawings. One of skill in the art will recognize that
`such directional language refers to locations in downhole
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`collar 98 may be positioned uphole of the float shoe 96.
`When present, the float collar serves as a redundant fluid
`inflow prevention means. The float collar is similar in
`construction to the float shoe, including a valve (not shown)
`that prevents wellbore fluid from entering the buoyant
`chamber. Similarly, the float shoe generally includes a check
`valve (not shown) that prevents inflow of fluid from the
`wellbore during running in or lowering the casing string into
`the wellbore.
`
`Float shoes are generally knownin the art. For example,
`USS. Pat. Nos. 2,117,318 and 2,008,818 describe float shoes.
`Float shoes may be closed by assistance with a spring. Once
`closed, pressure outside the float shoe may keep the shoe
`closed. In some float shoes, its check valve can be opened
`when fluid flow through the casing string is desired, for
`example, when cementing operations are to begin. In some
`cases,
`the float shoe may be drilled out after run-in is
`complete. Whenpresent, the float collar often has a landing
`surface for a wiper displacementplug. In addition to a float
`shoe and/orfloat collar, a baffle collar and/or guide shoe may
`be present. The present float tool 90, and the rupture disc
`assembly 10 therein, may be adapted to be compatible with
`mostfloat shoes, landing collars and float collars.
`Buoyant chamber 120 in float tool 90 may be created as
`a result of sealing of the lower end of casing string 94 with
`float shoe 96 and sealing of an upper end ofcasing string 94
`with rupture disc assembly 10. Rupture disc assembly 10
`includes a rupture disc 30 that will be ruptured at a subse-
`quentpoint in time, as will be discussed below. Rupture disc
`30 is generally a hemispherical dome, having a convex
`surface 36 oriented in the up-hole direction, and having a
`burst or rupture pressure (e.g. the pressure at which hydrau-
`lic pressure alone can break the disc) greater than the
`hydraulic pressure in the casing string when the casing string
`is being run, so as to avoid premature breakage of the disc.
`The distance between float shoe 96 and rupture disc assem-
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 13 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 13 of 19
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`6
`5
`installed. The landing collar is then installed on the casing
`bly 10 is selected to control the force tending to run the
`string. Drilling mud may be added to ensure that the float
`casing into the hole, and to maximize the vertical weight of
`shoe 96 is functioning properly. No fluid is added to the
`the casing string, as noted above.
`casing prior to installing the rupture disc assembly (unless
`Optionally, a debris catcher 70 maybe installed downhole
`that a liquid or a gas other than air is to be used). Once a
`of rupture disc assembly 10, generally in the horizontal
`desired amount of casing is run into the wellbore, rupture
`portion 140 of the wellbore 92. The debris catcher may be
`any suitable means for capturing pieces of the rupture disc,
`disc assembly 10 is installed. The remaining casing is run in,
`
`once shattered. For example,afilter, a baffle, a screen, etc. filling the casing with mud.
`may be usedas the debris catcher. In theillustrated embodi-
`The casing string,
`including float tool 90,
`is run into
`ment, a particular type of debris catcher 70 is shown, with
`wellbore 91 until the friction drag on the casing string 94
`projections on debris catcher 70 facing uphole so as to
`with the walls of wellbore 92 will not allow the casing string
`capture debris from rupture disc 30. The debris catcher can
`to be run to a greater depth. When run to the desired or
`be installed into the casing string by threaded connection,
`maximum depth, float shoe 96 may be located close to the
`between a landing collar 100 and a pup joint (not shown),
`“toe” or bottom of the wellbore 92. Rupture disc assembly
`whenpresent. Furtherillustrative details of debris catcher 70
`10 maybepositionedin the vertical section 130 of the well.
`are presented hereinbelow.
`The vertical weight of the casing string assists in overcom-
`Moreparticularly, landing collar 100 may be positioned
`ing drag on the casing string, allowing the casing string to
`between sealing device 96 and rupture disc assembly 10.
`be positioned to a greater depth, and/or to be movedhori-
`The landing collar may be present on the surface ofthe float
`zontally in the wellbore. The hydrostatic pressure during
`collar, when present. Landing collar 100 may be generally
`run-in mustbe less than the rupture burst pressure of rupture
`used in cementing operations for receiving cementing plugs,
`disc 30, to prevent premature rupture of the disc. Generally,
`such as a wiper plug. Suitable landing collars are known in
`the rupture disc may have a pressure rating of 10,000 to
`the art, and float tool 100 does not require that a particular
`30,000 psi, for example.
`landing collar be used, so long as the landing collar has
`Once the casing has run and landed, circulating equip-
`surface for receiving a plug and so long as the landing collar
`ment may beinstalled. The rupture disc is then burst by
`can be suitably installed on the casing string.
`pressuring the casing from surface. To accomplishthis, fluid
`The region of the casing string between rupture disc
`pressure (e.g., from the surface) is applied through the
`assembly 10 and float shoe 96 has increased buoyancy. The
`casing string 94. Thefluid exerts force on the convex side 36
`casing in this region may beair-filled. Whenthis is the case,
`of rupture disc 30, and on a securing mechanism holding the
`there is no need to fill the casing string with fluid prior to
`rupture disc in place, as discussed in further detail herein-
`running the casing string in, and there is no need to substitute
`below. The force is sufficient to overcome the engagement
`the air in the casing once installed in the well. However,
`function of the securing mechanism, causing the disc to
`fluids of lesser density than the fluid in the upper casing
`suddenly move downward, and shatter against a region of
`string 93 may be used. For example, the buoyant chamber
`the casing string (such as an impact surface on a tubular), as
`maybefilled with a gas such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide or
`will be described in more detail below. Once the rupture disc
`air, and other gases mayalso be suitable. Light liquids may
`has burst, fluid pumping is continued for a short time, and
`also be used. Generally, the buoyant chamber mustbefilled
`then stopped. The rupture of the disc should be evident from
`with fluid that has a lower specific gravity than the well fluid
`the surface by observing both movement and sound. There
`in the wellbore in whichit is run, and generally, the choice
`mayalso be a pressure drop.
`of which gas or liquid to use, is dependent on factors such
`After the steps involvedin installing the float tool into the
`as the well conditions and the amount of buoyancy desired.
`wellbore have been performed, and the disc has been shat-
`In ordertofill the casing string with the lighter fluid or gas,
`tered, additional operations can be performed. Fluid flow
`the casing string may be sealed with the float device, the
`through the casing string following rupture mayallow the air
`landing collar installed, and the casing ran into the wellbore
`or other fluid or gas that was in the buoyant chamberto rise
`with air. The air may then be flushed out,andthestring filled
`to the surface and be vented from the casing string, for
`with the gas or liquid from surface, prior to installing the
`example. The cavity can then befilled with other fluid (e.g.
`rupture burst assembly. The buoyancy of the buoyant cham-
`non-flotation fluid). For example, the casing string may be
`ber assists in running the casing string to the desired depth.
`filled with drilling fluid. When float shoe 96 is opened,
`Method of Installing Casing String
`conventional cementing operations can begin.
`It
`is also
`Thefloat tool, and thus rupture disc assembly 10, may be
`possible to use the float tool of the present disclosure in
`used in a method of installing a casing string, and in a
`reverse cementing operations.
`In reverse cementing, a
`method to float a casing. As noted above, running a casing
`cementslurry may be pumped downthe annulus 110, rather
`string in deviated wells and in long horizontal wells can
`than through the casing. When cementing operations are
`result in significantly increased drag forces. A casing string
`performed, a cement plug is delivered through the casing
`may becomestuck before reaching the desired location. This
`string. The cement plug mayassist in sweeping ruptured disc
`is especially true when the weight of the casing in the
`fragments into debris catcher 70. Debris catcher 70 prevents
`wellbore produces more drag forces than the weight tending
`fragments from entering the float shoe and/or float collar.
`to slide the casing down the hole. When too much forceis
`Alternatively, pieces of the shattered disc may be percolated
`applied to push the casing string into the well, this can result
`to the surface. Further, because the casing ID is restored, the
`in damageto the casing string. The present float tool helps
`present method and float tool are ideal for use in ball-drop
`systems.
`to address some ofthese problems.
`In the method of installing a casing string, the casing
`Oncethe disc has been ruptured, the inside diameter of the
`string 94 is initially made up at the surface. For example,
`casing string in the region of the rupture disc assembly 10 is
`when present, the debris catcher 70 is generally connected
`substantially the same as that in the remainderof the casing
`with the float shoe and/or floatcollar (e.g. the debris catcher
`string (e.g. casing ID (inner diameter) is restored following
`70 generally can be threadedly connected to float shoe 96).
`rupture of the disc). One way to accomplish this may be to
`There may be one or more pup joints or similar piping
`have the disc installed in a widened region of the casing
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 14 of 19
`Case 6:22-cv-01316 Document 1-2 Filed 12/30/22 Page 14 of 19
`
`US 10,465,445 B2
`
`7
`string (e.g. within radially expandedportions of one or more
`tubulars, the tubulars being connectable to other tubulars in
`the casing string). In other words, the tubular string can be
`adapted to accommodate the diameter of the rupture disc.
`Theability to restore full casing ID is useful since downhole
`tools andthe like can be deployed withoutrestriction into the
`casing string once the disc has been removed, and since
`further work can be done without the need to remove any
`part of the float tool.
`The rupture happens almost instantaneously or rapidly,
`and since full casing ID is restored, maximum flow rates can
`be quickly achieved. Moreover, because the debris is small,
`there is little danger to the casing string from the ruptured
`pieces, and the potential for clogging is minimal. Compared
`to manyprior art devices, the present float tool is inexpen-
`sive to manufacture. The rupture disc is ruptured by engage-
`ment against a region ofthe casing string (hydraulic pressure
`shears the engagementofthe rupture disc within the one or
`more tubular, allowing the disc to move downward and
`shatter). There is no need to drop a weight into the casing
`string to break the disc, for example. Moreover, there can be
`various configurationsof the rupture disc (grooved or etched
`disc, disc of thinner thickness) to improvethe breakability of
`the disc. This allows the disc to break into suitably sized
`pieces that will not impair wellbore function. Generally, it
`has been observed,
`that using the various methods and
`devices disclosed herein, the fragments of the rupture disc
`may be smaller than about one inch, or less.
`Rupture Disc Assembly
`FIG. 2 shows anillustrative implementation of rupture
`disc assembly 10, suitable for installation into the float tool
`of FIG. 1. The rupture disc assembly 10 may consist of an
`upper tubular member 16 defining an upper fluid passage-
`way 12 through its interior, coupled to a lower tubular
`member18 defining a lower fluid passageway 14 throughits
`interior, and a rupture disc 30 sealingly engaged between
`upper tubular member 16 and lower tubular member 18.
`Upper tubular member 16 may be coupled with lower
`tubular member in such a way that the outer wall of lower
`tubular member 18 overlaps at least a portion of the outer
`wall of upper tubular member 16. In the illustrated embodi-
`ment, upper tubular member 16 and lower tubular member
`18 may be mechanically joined together at 20, which may be
`a threaded connection. Various other interconnecting means
`that would be known to a person skilled in the art are
`possible. A fluid seal between upper tubular member16 and
`the lower tubular member 18 may be provided by one or
`more seals. In the illustrated embodiment, the fluid seal is
`created by an O-ring seal 22, with flanking back-up seals 24.
`Lower
`tubular member 18 may include a radially
`expandedregion 25 with a tapered internal surface 58, which
`maybe a frusto-conical surface (e.g. lead-in chamfer). The
`radially expanded region 25 is continuous with a constricted
`opening (represented by dash line 27), continuous with
`passageway 14 in lower tubular member 18. As will be
`discussed below, various surfaces on lower tubular member
`18—most notably surface 58—can form impact surfaces for
`shattering the rupture disc. Although not shown in the
`Figure, inner surface 54 of upper tubular member 16 may be
`threaded for connection to other members of the casing
`string, and outer surface 56 of lower tubular member 18 may
`also be threaded for connection to other members of the
`
`casing string (not shown). These other members of the
`casing string may have an ID similar to the diameter of the
`constricted opening 27 of lower tubular member 18. It is
`noted that the tubulars may be connectedto the casing string
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`8
`using various means of connection. Upper tubular member
`16 also has a radially expanded portion 29 to help accom-
`modate disc 30.
`
`Rupture disc 30 may be sealingly engaged between upper
`tubular member 16 and lower tubular member 18, concen-
`trically disposed traverse to the longitudinal axis of the
`upper and lower tubular members. In the illustrated embodi-
`ment, a portion 32 of rupture disc 30 is a hollow, hemi-
`spherical dome, with a concave surface 38 that faces down-
`hole and a convex surface 36 that is oriented in the up-hole
`direction. Hemispherical portion 32 is continuous with
`cylindrical portion 34 which terminates in a circumferential
`edge 39 ‘having a diameter that
`is similar to the inner
`diameter of the radially expanded region 25 of lower tubular
`member18 at shoulder 26.
`The upper and lower tubulars can be understood to more
`generally constitute upper and lowerportions of the overall
`assembly 10.
`In the illustrated embodiment, the diameter of disc 30 at
`edge 39 may be 4.8 inches, for example. The diameterof the
`top of the radially expanded region 25 of lower tubular
`member 18 may be similar. The diameter of constricted
`opening 27 of lower tubular member 18 may be 4.5 inches
`(which is a common ID for

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket