throbber
USCA Case #21-5254 Document #1921975 Filed: 11/11/2021 Page 1 of 2
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
`____________
`
`September Term, 2021
`1:21-cv-02769-TSC
`Filed On: November 11, 2021
`
`No. 21-5254
`
`Donald J. Trump, in his capacity as the 45th
`President of the United States,
`
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity
`as Chairman of the United States House
`Select Committee to Investigate the January
`6th Attack on the United States Capitol, et al.,
`
`Appellees
`
`BEFORE: Millett, Wilkins, and Jackson, Circuit Judges
`
`O R D E R
`
`Upon consideration of the emergency motion for an administrative injunction and
`for expedited briefing schedule, it is
`
`ORDERED that an administrative injunction be entered and appellees the
`National Archives and Records Administration and the Archivist be enjoined from
`releasing the records requested by the House Select Committee over which appellant
`asserts executive privilege, pending further order of this court. The purpose of this
`administrative injunction is to protect the court’s jurisdiction to address appellant’s
`claims of executive privilege and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the
`merits. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 33 (2021). It is
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for an expedited briefing schedule, which
`the court construes as a motion to expedite consideration of the appeal of the district
`court’s order denying the motion for a preliminary injunction, be granted. The following
`briefing schedule will apply:
`
`Appellant’s Brief
`
`Joint Appendix
`
`November 16, 2021 (12:00 noon)
`
`November 16, 2021 (12:00 noon)
`
`

`

`USCA Case #21-5254 Document #1921975 Filed: 11/11/2021 Page 2 of 2
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
`____________
`September Term, 2021
`
`No. 21-5254
`
`Appellees’ Briefs
`
`November 22, 2021 (12:00 noon)
`
`Appellant’s Reply Brief
`
`November 24, 2021 (12:00 noon)
`
`Oral argument will be held before this panel on November 30, 2021, at 9:30 a.m.
`
`All issues must be raised by appellant in the opening brief. The court ordinarily
`will not consider issues and arguments raised for the first time in the reply brief.
`
`To enhance the clarity of their briefs, the parties are urged to limit the use of
`abbreviations, including acronyms. While acronyms may be used for entities and
`statutes with widely recognized initials, briefs should not contain acronyms that are not
`widely known. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 43
`(2021); Notice Regarding Use of Acronyms (D.C. Cir. Jan. 26, 2010).
`
`The parties are directed to file their briefs electronically on the date and time due,
`and to submit paper copies as soon as possible thereafter. All briefs and appendices
`must contain the date that the case is scheduled for oral argument at the top of the
`cover. See D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(8).
`
`Per Curiam
`
`FOR THE COURT:
`Mark J. Langer, Clerk
`
`BY:
`
`/s/
`Amanda Himes
`Deputy Clerk
`
`Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket