throbber
USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 1 of 79
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` [DO NOT PUBLISH]
`
`
`In the
`United States Court of Appeals
`For the Eleventh Circuit
`
`____________________
`
`No. 20-10373
`
`____________________
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`versus
`
`ANDREW THOMPSON,
`a.k.a. Nico,
`ALFONZO CHURCHWELL,
`a.k.a. Boo Boo,
`JORDAN RODRIGUEZ,
`a.k.a. Big Man,
`
`
` Plaintiff-Appellee,
`
` Defendants-Appellants.
`
`
`____________________
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 2 of 79
`
`2
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`20-10373
`
`Appeals from the United States District Court
`for the Middle District of Florida
`D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00205-WFJ-TGW-3
`____________________
`
`Before GRANT, LUCK, and HULL, Circuit Judges.
`
`LUCK, Circuit Judge:
`
`Jordan Rodriguez, Alfonzo Churchwell, and Andrew
`Thompson were members of a gang called “Third Shift” that sold
`drugs, robbed, fought with rival gangs, and murdered in further-
`ance of the gang’s operations. They were charged with a slew of
`crimes that the gang committed, convicted of most of them, and
`sentenced to life in prison. They now appeal their convictions,
`challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, an evidentiary ruling,
`the jury instructions, the district court’s response to a jury ques-
`tion, and comments the district court made about Rodriguez’s
`counsel’s strategic choices. After careful review, and with the ben-
`efit of oral argument, we affirm their convictions.
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 3 of 79
`
`20-10373
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`3
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND1
`
`The Third Shift gang
`
`The Third Shift gang was based in Oneco, a suburb of
`Bradenton, Florida. Rodriguez, Churchwell, and Thompson were
`members of Third Shift. Rodriguez and Thompson were child-
`hood friends. Rodriguez’s sister Maryha—who was also Thomp-
`son’s ex-girlfriend—described the two as “best friends” and said
`Thompson was Rodriguez’s “little do-boy,” meaning Thompson
`“would always choose [Rodriguez], always, even with risking his
`family.” Thompson’s brother-in-law, Johnny Cintron; Cintron’s
`friend, Phillip Uscanga; Uscanga’s friend, Raymy; Rodriguez’s
`brother, Jesse; and a man known as Macho were Third Shift mem-
`bers too.
`
`Cintron testified to seeing Rodriguez “rep” Third Shift—
`“[t]hrowing up gang signs [and] stuff like that”—“and talk about
`being in the gang.” Cintron said the gang’s sign was “like an A-ok
`sign”; the gang also had a color (black), an “affiliated” or “friendly
`gang[]” (North Side), and a “rival gang[]” (South Side). Cintron saw
`Thompson “throw up the gang sign” and wear the gang’s “flag” (“a
`black bandanna”). And he heard Macho sing a Third Shift song.
`
`
`1 “[W]e recount the facts . . . in the light most favorable to the government
`and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the jury’s verdict.” United States
`v. Martin, 803 F.3d 581, 585 n.1 (11th Cir. 2015).
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 4 of 79
`
`4
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`20-10373
`
`The trap house
`
`Third Shift operated a “trap house”—a place where people
`“go[] to purchase drugs and use drugs on [the] premises”—on 11th
`Street East in Oneco. J.R., Churchwell’s “close” friend and a “big
`hitter” drug dealer in the Bradenton area, “opened” the trap house
`and “put[] his man [Rodriguez] in there” to “make some money.”
`Rodriguez lived there, paid rent and utilities, and was “in charge.”
`According to Cintron, Rodriguez ran the trap house from mid-2015
`through late 2016 and had no other job.
`
`During that time, Rodriguez, Cintron, Jesse, and other Third
`Shift members hung out at the trap house “[a]lmost every day.”
`Pole cameras (installed by local law enforcement in June 2016) cap-
`tured Thompson at the trap house several times, and both Cintron
`and Thompson himself testified that Thompson was there about
`once a week. Cintron saw Churchwell at the trap house “[a] couple
`days,” and Cintron and Jesse’s friend, Quentin Couch, saw Church-
`well there too.
`
`The members of Third Shift sold drugs from the trap house.
`In fact, Stephanie Brewer—the trap house’s housekeeper—said
`buying and using drugs was “the main thing that went on in th[e
`trap] house.” Rodriguez’s neighbor testified to seeing “a lot of traf-
`fic” coming and going, and a lot of “[p]eople hanging out,” at the
`trap house. Pole camera footage similarly showed “lots of short-
`term traffic”—by car, bicycle, and foot—with people visiting the
`trap house “at all hours of the day and late into the night and the
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 5 of 79
`
`20-10373
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`5
`
`early morning hours,” often for less than four minutes. A law en-
`forcement search on September 11, 2016, revealed drug parapher-
`nalia around and throughout the trap house—including a digital
`scale, syringes, glass pipes, a plastic pill bottle, plastic gloves, and
`plastic baggies—plus containers of cash. A later search turned up
`more syringes, as well as a duffle bag containing “a bunch of pill
`bottles” holding “numerous unidentified pills and also narcotics.”
`
`J.R. would cook crack cocaine at the trap house a few times
`a week, after which Rodriguez would “break[ the crack cocaine]
`down into small pieces,” “separating them and organizing them”
`on the kitchen table. Rodriguez kept drugs—crack and powder co-
`caine, marijuana, heroin, and pills, “[a]nything that you needed”—
`in a backpack in his bedroom and sold them from the trap house’s
`kitchen or living room multiple times a day. He sold to Cintron a
`few times a week and he twice enlisted Cintron to sell marijuana
`and crack cocaine on his behalf when Rodriguez was busy. Couch
`said he bought marijuana from Rodriguez at the trap house
`“[m]ore than probably like a hundred times,” and Maryha bought
`marijuana from Rodriguez too. Shazlynn Dunton (Thompson’s
`girlfriend) bought marijuana and cocaine from Rodriguez, and
`Brandi Simon admitted both to buying marijuana and crack co-
`caine from Rodriguez and to paying him to use a room at the trap
`house to take pills or shoot Dilaudid.
`
`Pole camera footage from January 2017 showed Rodriguez
`dealing drugs out of a van parked in front of the trap house. When
`officers initiated a traffic stop of the van shortly after observing the
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 6 of 79
`
`6
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`20-10373
`
`drug transactions, they discovered marijuana, “several bags of
`crack cocaine,” powder cocaine, narcotics, unlabeled prescription
`pill bottles, baggies, a scale, two rifles, a handgun, a pistol, a holster,
`ammunition, a baton, zip ties, a flashlight, and around $3,700 cash.
`Rodriguez would later tell a cellmate at FCI Coleman Low that he
`had sold marijuana and heroin from the trap house.
`
`Others, including Churchwell and Thompson, sold drugs
`from the trap house too. Brewer testified that Rodriguez “had men
`underneath him”—“younger boys”—selling drugs at the trap
`house. Cintron admitted he started selling crack that he bought
`from Rodriguez because he “was just there, and [he] would see
`how many people would come[, s]o [he] just started doing it also.”
`Rodriguez knew he was selling from the trap house, Cintron said,
`but Cintron “never had to get [Rodriguez’s] permission.”
`
`Cintron also saw Churchwell at the trap house “[a] couple
`days” selling crack and heroin. Churchwell received and sent text
`messages arranging sales of heroin and molly too. And when
`Churchwell was arrested in September 2016, multiple baggies con-
`taining heroin were confiscated from him.
`
`As for Thompson, he admitted to selling drugs for Dunton
`a few times “when it wasn’t available or convenient for her to han-
`dle her business.” But Maryha testified that she saw Thompson sell
`marijuana, Kyle Stackhouse (another drug dealer who knew
`Thompson from the neighborhood) saw him sell crack cocaine,
`and Dunton saw Thompson sell methamphetamine as well.
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 7 of 79
`
`20-10373
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`7
`
`Thompson and Churchwell sometimes sold drugs they had pur-
`chased from Rodriguez; other times, they sold drugs they’d pro-
`cured elsewhere.
`
`Rodriguez
`
`Rodriguez flaunted his gang activities on social media. His
`posts regularly referenced “thug life” and “G shit.” In April 2016,
`Rodriguez posted: “im out here tryna grind in each and every way,
`stackin up my paper tryna avoid catching a case.” And a few days
`later, he posted:
`
`i been thuggin it since i was 14, i swear i couldnt stay
`out the court scene . . . . i get out there and thug it
`cause i aint no ones concern . . . . i aint had a job in
`so long cause all i know is the streets.
`
`Rodriguez also posted about using firearms and other forms of vi-
`olence. For example, about a week after a January 2016 drive-by
`shooting we discuss in detail below, Rodriguez posted a status up-
`date declaring:
`
`I play this game well I feel like its monopoly, except
`I’m grinding hard I don’t see nothing stopping me,
`tossin out that money like I’m some kind of slot ma-
`chine, keep ya eyes to yaself before u hear that choppa
`scream, 100 round drum and its fully loaded, take me
`as a joke but ima shoot it if I tote it.2
`
`
`2 “Choppa” (or chopper) is street slang for an assault rifle.
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 8 of 79
`
`8
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`20-10373
`
`A few days later, he updated his status: “It’s time to leave state
`cause [n-words] is gna make me go Rambo dog g shit.” Then, in
`April 2016, he commented: “i been in oneco my whole life and
`these hoes really got shit fucked up talking like they bad cause ill
`make them disapear.”
`
`Rodriguez used his social media to complain about—and
`even taunt—snitches too. In one status update, he said: “Facebook
`gangster right here [n-word] my adress is 5832 11th street east came
`fade”—that is, “come fight”—“if u want it [n-word] aint nobody
`scared [n-word] but believe me if u pull a gun im killing yo ass [n-
`word], fuck talking run up.” Similarly, a few weeks after the Janu-
`ary 2016 drive-by shooting, he challenged people who “think they
`hard but wna talk to the police and snitch”: “I stay on 11th street
`come my way with that p**** shit dog I know real crips that’ll
`check yaw ass.” Later the same day, he sent a message ranting
`about people “who act gangsta but they wna talk to police when
`gangsta shit goes down bruhh I just needa get out of state before I
`catch a charge for fukin somebody up dog.”
`
`Apart from posting on social media, Rodriguez protected
`the trap house in numerous ways. The refrigerator—which the
`September 2016 search revealed to contain beer and a drawer of
`money—was secured with a lock. He had Brewer (the house-
`keeper) periodically “go in”—“[e]verybody that was [there] using
`[drugs] had to get out”—and “bleach and clean the whole trap
`house.” She’d “bleach everything down,” “bring out” all the drug
`“paraphernalia,” and collect anything of “monetary value” to “give
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 9 of 79
`
`20-10373
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`9
`
`back to the house man.” Rodriguez or J.R. paid Brewer with
`“[m]aybe just a little spending money but mostly with drugs.”
`
`Rodriguez also installed security cameras outside the trap
`house, and a TV in the living room displayed a live feed of the sur-
`rounding area. And he supplied countless firearms, teaching Third
`Shift members to wipe ammunition clean of fingerprints before
`loading them. Cintron saw “[a]n AK, a shotgun . . . [i]n the living
`room,” and “a couple pistols” (specifically, a revolver and a “regu-
`lar” 9-millimeter). Couch saw an FN gun, a “mini Draco”—“[a]
`mini chopper, like a mini AK”—and a “little Warthog gun,” all be-
`longing to Rodriguez. The September 2016 search turned up a
`semiautomatic handgun, plus holsters, magazines, ammunition (of
`various calibers, including rifle ammunition and shotgun shells),
`and spent casings throughout the trap house.
`
`Lots of people handled Rodriguez’s firearms while at the
`trap house. According to Brewer, “whoever was in the[ trap house]
`usually had [Rodriguez’s] guns on them,” and Cintron said he
`“would go in and just pick [the revolver] up” himself. Cintron re-
`called Rodriguez and his brother Jesse holding the firearms; he also
`saw Thompson “grab the [AK-47] and play with it” when he
`stopped by the trap house. Pole camera footage confirmed this,
`showing Rodriguez and Thompson armed—Thompson with a “ri-
`fle-style firearm,” at one point—while around the trap house. And
`Thompson admitted, while testifying, that he “handle[d] assault
`weapons” both at Rodriguez’s house and at his own. Maryha tes-
`tified that Thompson “kept a lot of guns at [their] house” and
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 10 of 79
`
`10
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`20-10373
`
`would “[p]lay with them, . . . [p]oint[ing] the lasers on [the] guns”
`at police vehicles; Stackhouse likewise testified that Thompson
`once “rode by [on a bicycle] and pointed [an AK-38 or 40] at the
`truck [Stackhouse] was sitting in.”
`The gang’s murders
`
`Theft and violence went hand in hand with Third Shift’s
`drug business. Cintron testified that members of Third Shift “reg-
`ularly committed thefts.” A Manatee County deputy described see-
`ing Thompson take a bike—then quickly replace it after noticing
`he was being watched. And Maryha and Dunton both recalled
`Thompson bragging about committing robberies. After one rob-
`bery—during which Third Shift members stole “a TV and a pistol
`and some money”—Rodriguez “threatened to slap the shit out of”
`Cintron’s sister for calling the police.
`
`Third Shift members also engaged in gun fights. And they
`murdered rival gang members, other drug dealers, and even com-
`plaining customers. Three of those murders are relevant to this
`appeal.
`
`Rodriguez’s murder of Julio Tellez
`
`First, Rodriguez killed Julio Tellez, a rival gang member,
`during a drive-by shooting. On the morning of New Year’s Day,
`2016, two Third Shift members—Cintron and Uscanga—drove
`Uscanga’s red Mustang convertible, top down, to a corner store to
`buy cigars. Members of their rival gang, South Side, were at the
`store. Third Shift was “always in altercations with” South Side, and
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 11 of 79
`
`20-10373
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`11
`
`this New Year’s Day was no different. Two South Side members
`attacked Cintron with a long wooden stick outside the store and
`then fled in a minivan after Cintron overpowered them.
`
`Cintron and Uscanga chased the minivan all the way back to
`a “South Side gang member’s house,” “telling [them] to pull
`over”—and at one point Cintron threw a water bottle through the
`van’s open window. Cintron recognized the house from “a prior
`time when [he, his brother, Macho, and Jesse] got into an alterca-
`tion over there.” That time, “[a] bunch of dudes came out with
`guns”; so Cintron, unarmed but worried there might again be
`armed South Side members at the house, decided to abandon the
`chase. He and Uscanga instead went to retrieve Uscanga’s gun
`from fellow Third Shift member Raymy, and then the three went
`to the trap house for ammunition.
`
`The house the minivan fled to, it turns out, belonged to
`Tellez; the South Side members went there because Tellez had told
`them “he would have [their] backs” if they “ever needed anything.”
`When they arrived, though, Tellez sent them away: he didn’t have
`any firearms on hand and “didn’t want nothing to do with what
`they had going on.” But because “he felt like some trouble was
`going to happen,” Tellez summoned help from his friend Eliceo
`Santoyo, who brought over a 9-millimeter Beretta and an SKS.
`
`Meanwhile, at the trap house, Cintron told Rodriguez and
`Macho about the fight at the corner store and got ammunition
`from Rodriguez (who had supplied him with bullets before). The
`Third Shift members hatched a plan to retaliate for the attack:
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 12 of 79
`
`12
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`20-10373
`
`Uscanga would drive Cintron and Raymy by Tellez’s house in the
`red Mustang—top up this time, “[s]o [the men] couldn’t be seen”—
`and Cintron (the only one armed in the car) would “just start shoot-
`ing” to lure people out of the house. Then Rodriguez would drive
`his blue Honda by the house, with Macho (unarmed) in the passen-
`ger seat, and “finish the job”—“mean[ing] whoever came out[, Ro-
`driguez] was going to start shooting at.”
`
`Things went exactly as planned. As Uscanga drove the red
`Mustang past Tellez’s house, Cintron shot into the empty yard.
`Cintron’s shots drew Tellez, Santoyo, and Tellez’s friend Juan
`Montoya outside from the living room; they didn’t return fire be-
`cause the Mustang “was already kind of far down the road” by then
`(and because Santoyo noticed some children playing nearby).
`Then, as the men started heading back inside the house, Rodriguez
`“rolled up and parked [the Honda] in front of the house,” “halfway
`in the road, halfway in the driveway.” Rodriguez reached across
`Macho and fired through the passenger-side window, killing Tellez
`and wounding Montoya. When Santoyo fired back, Rodriguez
`fled. Macho would later complain to Cintron about being burned
`by shell casings when Rodriguez fired over him from the driver’s
`seat.
`
`After the murder, the Third Shift members returned to the
`trap house. Cintron recalled Rodriguez telling him that the initial
`shots had lured people out of Tellez’s house but “they were fo-
`cused on [the red Mustang], and [Rodriguez] got the upper hand
`on them and started shooting,” after which Rodriguez “saw a body
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 13 of 79
`
`20-10373
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`13
`
`drop.” Rodriguez admitted to Couch—and later to his cellmate at
`Coleman Low—that he shot Tellez. Rodriguez also bragged to the
`gang members that he had shouted “Fuck South Side” as he shot
`Tellez. And Rodriguez told the others there was a bullet hole in
`his Honda; Cintron saw the hole in the car’s right back fender. Ro-
`driguez eventually told Cintron that he had the Honda fixed at a
`body shop before selling it. DMV records confirmed that Rodri-
`guez sold the car three weeks after the shooting, and officers exam-
`ining the car discovered both visible gunshot damage to the trunk’s
`interior and an area “on the passenger side just above the taillight”
`with “a lighter blue” exterior paint. According to Cintron, Rodri-
`guez disposed of the guns used in the shooting too.
`
`Churchwell’s murder of Earnestine Gardner
`
`Second, Churchwell murdered Earnestine Gardner in the
`front yard of the Third Shift trap house. The morning of Septem-
`ber 11, 2016, Couch saw Churchwell at the house armed with one
`of Rodriguez’s revolvers. Brewer, the trap house’s housekeeper,
`arrived early that morning to find Gardner “arguing with [Church-
`well] out front” about being shorted ten dollars in change after
`Gardner bought cocaine from Churchwell.
`
`Rodriguez was sleeping at the time. Because Brewer was
`worried the argument would attract the police’s attention, she sent
`someone to wake up Rodriguez in hopes that he’d “diffuse[]” the
`situation. When Rodriguez went outside, Churchwell came inside
`and sat beside Brewer in a pair of chairs near the kitchen. Shortly
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 14 of 79
`
`14
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`20-10373
`
`after, Gardner “came in[side] . . . and walked straight to [Church-
`well] . . . and stood right up over him.” Gardner told Churchwell
`she was “gonna show [him that she] don’t play about [her] money”;
`then she walked back outside.
`
`“[A]s soon as [Gardner] got through the threshold of the
`door,” Churchwell stood up, went to the doorway, then turned
`back to look at Brewer. He “looked at [Brewer] for three long sec-
`onds,” silent, before “pull[ing] his .45 and turn[ing] around and
`[shooting Gardner] in the back.” According to Brewer, Churchwell
`then “walked up on [Gardner] and he shot her three more times.”
`Pole camera footage showed Churchwell fleeing on foot; he would
`later admit to his cellmate at Coleman Low that he had shot Gard-
`ner. Gardner died at the hospital from her injuries.
`
`Rodriguez called 911 at 6:38 a.m.—about two minutes after
`Gardner was shot. Even though he was standing close to Church-
`well when Gardner was murdered, Rodriguez told law enforce-
`ment officers that he had been sleeping when he heard gunshots
`outside his house, hadn’t seen the shooter, and didn’t know who
`the victim was. And even though Churchwell and Rodriguez had
`called each other nineteen times on the day of Gardner’s murder,
`Rodriguez later told the police that he didn’t know who Church-
`well was either. Rodriguez texted Churchwell a few times that day
`too, including sending a message at 9:23 a.m. reading “Bruh call me
`u str8.”
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 15 of 79
`
`20-10373
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`15
`
`Several months after Churchwell was arrested for Gardner’s
`murder, he called Rodriguez several times from jail. In a mid-No-
`vember 2016 call, Rodriguez told Churchwell he got his security-
`camera DVR back from the police. Churchwell said he was “shit-
`ting for a minute,” but Rodriguez assured him that “we straight”
`because the DVR “ain’t have nothing” on it, so “all the[ police] got
`is [Brewer].” Churchwell also said that if he could figure out who
`had been at the trap house the day of Gardner’s murder, then his
`“private investigator” could “talk to people” and “verify” Church-
`well wasn’t there. Rodriguez said “I gotcha[] bro. I’ll have people
`call.” Churchwell later told Rodriguez that his investigator could
`“get everybody . . . [r]ounded up. . . . Boom, boom, boom, you
`know what I’m saying?” Rodriguez responded “Yeah.”
`
`“[O]utta everybody,” Churchwell said, Rodriguez “keep[s]
`it the real[e]st”—“when I came . . . back from court, bro, I was like,
`damn, bro showed up for real, baby”—and Churchwell was “gonna
`carry that back to” Rodriguez, telling him: “[Y]ou got a [n-word]
`on your team, boy, that’s gonna ride or die about you now . . . . I’d
`spill my blood for you, boy. . . . I’m fixing to ride for a [n-word],
`bro, that’s what it is, [n-word]. That’s what it is. You ain’t gotta
`worry about nothing now. Straight up.” “I be wanting you to get
`the fuck up outta there,” Rodriguez responded. Rodriguez also
`commented that the police suspected Churchwell of Gardner’s
`murder because “[Churchwell] already got a previous charge . . . so
`they already looking at it, like, yeah, he capable of it ‘cause he al-
`ready did it.”
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 16 of 79
`
`16
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`20-10373
`
`Later, in January 2017—during what Churchwell warned
`would “be the last time [he] call[ed]”—Churchwell asked Rodri-
`guez whether he “got rid of [Churchwell’s] three-wheeler, you feel
`me, that three-wheeler.” “[N]othing else” was worrying him,
`Churchwell said. Rodriguez assured Churchwell that it was al-
`ready “gone.” In that case, Churchwell said, “don’t worry about
`nothing. You know what I’m saying? My lawyer said we good,
`bro.” A Manatee County Sheriff’s Office detective who listened to
`the jail call testified that the meaning of “three-wheeler” was “un-
`known” but that he “highly doubt[ed]” Churchwell meant a bike.
`
`Thompson’s murders of Berry Joseph
`and Lashawna Stevenson-Weeks
`
`Third, Thompson murdered Berry Joseph and LaShawna
`Stevenson-Weeks. Joseph was a local drug dealer from whom
`Thompson and his girlfriend Dunton bought cocaine. In January
`2017, Thompson told Dunton he was going to see Joseph to repay
`a debt. Thompson drove off, armed and wearing a hat, in Dunton’s
`Pontiac G6 to meet Joseph. Thompson met Joseph in a parking lot,
`followed him back to Joseph’s house, and parked next to Joseph’s
`Explorer.
`
`A neighbor across the street saw, from her porch, the two
`vehicles parked in Joseph’s driveway. She reported seeing one per-
`son inside Joseph’s Explorer and two men—one wearing a red
`hat—standing next to it. The neighbor heard a gunshot, saw a per-
`son lying on the ground while the man with the red hat leaned into
`Joseph’s Explorer, and then heard more gunshots. The man in the
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 17 of 79
`
`20-10373
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`17
`
`red hat then drove away in the Pontiac, “[n]onchalant, like nothing
`happened.” The neighbor would later identify Thompson as the
`shooter in a photo line-up, and officers would match prints col-
`lected from the Explorer’s front driver’s side window to Thomp-
`son. The man lying on the ground by the Explorer was Joseph, and
`the person in the vehicle was Stevenson-Weeks; both died from
`gunshot wounds.
`
`Starting about forty-five minutes after the murders—and
`continuing throughout the next two and a half hours—Thompson
`and Rodriguez spoke by phone eight times (and a ninth by text).
`During that time, Rodriguez used his own car to drive Thompson
`back to Thompson’s house. Thompson burned his clothes on a
`grill as soon as he got home. While Thompson was showering,
`Dunton went into their living room to inspect the dark-colored
`“men’s toiletry bag or razor bag”—a description matching the bag
`Joseph used to carry his drugs—Thompson had brought into the
`house when he returned. Inside, she found powder cocaine, meth,
`and empty “little dime and nickel bags.”
`
`A bullet pierced the Pontiac’s windshield during the shoot-
`ing. But when Dunton asked where her car was, Thompson
`claimed it was being fixed because a tree branch fell on the wind-
`shield. A few days after the double-murder, Rodriguez texted and
`called to tell Thompson and Dunton that the Pontiac was fixed and
`ready to be picked up. Thompson testified that Rodriguez directed
`him to the body shop that repaired the damaged windshield.
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 18 of 79
`
`18
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`20-10373
`
`Thompson confessed to Stackhouse that Thompson ar-
`ranged to meet Joseph, “went to rob him” of his “[d]ope and
`money,” and shot and killed Joseph and Stevenson-Weeks.
`Thompson admitted that, after the murder, he went to a carwash
`“because [the car] had blood speckled on the front fender,” burned
`his clothes—but not his hat, which Thompson told Stackhouse
`“was on the dresser in the house when the police came and got
`him,” but “they didn’t bother the hat, . . . they left it on the
`dresser”—and spray-painted the car’s tire rims a different color “so
`the car wouldn’t match the description.” Thompson also told
`Stackhouse that one of his shots broke the Pontiac’s windshield—
`so “he took it to a shop to get the window fixed”—and another hit
`the car’s door; police would later find a projectile inside the door,
`as well as a “projectile hole” covered with electrical tape.
`PROCEDURAL HISTORY
`
`In July 2019, a grand jury returned a twenty-count indict-
`ment against Rodriguez, Churchwell, Thompson, and other code-
`fendants who are not part of this appeal.
`
`Count one charged Rodriguez, Churchwell, and Thompson
`with conspiracy to conduct and to participate in the affairs of a rack-
`eteering enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity, in vi-
`olation 18 U.S.C. section 1962(d). As overt acts in furtherance of
`the conspiracy, count one alleged that: (1) Rodriguez, Churchwell,
`and Thompson used the trap house to “maintain, manufacture,
`and distribute controlled substances” and to “maintain firearms”;
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 19 of 79
`
`20-10373
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`19
`
`(2) Rodriguez both “conspired to commit,” and actually commit-
`ted, a drive-by shooting resulting in Tellez’s murder; (3) Rodri-
`guez, Churchwell, and Thompson possessed (and Thompson also
`attempted to possess) with intent to distribute controlled sub-
`stances; (4) Churchwell murdered Gardner; (5) Rodriguez and
`Churchwell conspired to obstruct the investigation into Gardner’s
`murder; and (6) Rodriguez knowingly used and carried a firearm in
`furtherance of his drug trafficking crimes. Count one also gave no-
`tice of a series of “Special Sentencing Factors,” alleging that: (1) Ro-
`driguez killed Tellez “from a premeditated design . . . while at-
`tempting to murder another human being”; (2) Churchwell killed
`Gardner “from a premeditated design”; and (3) Thompson killed
`Joseph and Stevenson-Weeks “from a premeditated design . . .
`while perpetrating and attempting to perpetrate a robbery.”3
`Count two charged Rodriguez, Churchwell, and Thompson
`with conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distrib-
`ute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. sections 846
`and 841(b)(1)(C).
`
`Counts three through five charged Rodriguez with crimes
`related to Tellez’s murder. In count three, Rodriguez was charged
`with “conspir[acy] to murder rival gang members” in aid of racket-
`eering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1959(a)(5). In count four,
`
`
`3 The indictment also alleged as special sentencing factors that Thompson
`murdered Demetrius Robinson and Florence Randall, but the jury acquitted
`Thompson of these allegations.
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 20 of 79
`
`20
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`20-10373
`
`he was charged with murdering Tellez in aid of racketeering, in
`violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 1959(a)(1) and 2. And in count five,
`Rodriguez was charged with using and discharging a firearm dur-
`ing Tellez’s murder,
`in violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 2,
`924(c)(1)(A)(iii), and 924(j)(1).
`Count eight4 charged Thompson with possession of a con-
`trolled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of sec-
`tions 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C).
`
`Counts nine through twelve charged Churchwell and Rodri-
`guez with crimes related to Gardner’s murder. Count nine charged
`Churchwell with murder in aid of racketeering, in violation of sec-
`tion 1959(a)(1). Count ten charged him with using and discharging
`a firearm during and in relation to (1) the drug trafficking conspir-
`acy, (2) Gardner’s murder in aid of racketeering, and (3) maintain-
`ing a drug distribution house, in violation of 18 U.S.C. sections
`924(c), 924(c)(1)(A)(iii), and 924(j)(1). As a sentencing enhance-
`ment under section 924(j)(1), count ten also alleged that Church-
`well caused Gardner’s death “by murder as defined in 18 U.S.C.
`[section] 1111, through the use of a firearm.” Count eleven
`charged Churchwell with possession of ammunition by a felon, in
`violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). And count
`twelve charged Rodriguez as an accessory after the fact to Church-
`well’s offenses charged in counts nine through eleven, in violation
`of 18 U.S.C. section 3.
`
`
`4 Counts six and seven involved coconspirators who are not part of this appeal.
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 20-10373 Document: 154-1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 Page: 21 of 79
`
`20-10373
`
`Opinion of the Court
`
`21
`
`Counts thirteen through nineteen charged Thompson and
`Rodriguez with crimes related to the murders of Joseph and Ste-
`venson-Weeks. Count thirteen charged Thompson with attempt
`to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in viola-
`tion of sections 841(b)(1)(C) and 846. Counts fourteen and sixteen
`charged him with murdering Stevenson-Weeks and Joseph in aid
`of racketeering, in violation of section 1959(a)(1). Counts fifteen
`and seventeen charged Thompson with using and discharging a
`firearm during and in relation to (1) the drug trafficking conspiracy,
`(2) the attempt to possess and distribute a controlled substance
`charged in count thirteen, and (3) Stevenson-Weeks’s and Joseph’s
`murders in aid of racketeering, in violation of secti

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket