throbber
USCA11 Case: 21-10994 Date Filed: 04/22/2021 Page: 1 of 8
`
`No. 21-10994
`
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
`
`JOHN CARSON
`Plaintiff-Appellant,
`
`v.
`
`MONSANTO COMPANY,
`Defendant-Appellee
`
`On Appeal from the United States District Court
`for the Southern District of Georgia,
`No. 4:17-cv-00237-RSB-CLR (Baker)
`
`
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LETTER BRIEF
`
`R. Brent Wisner, Esq.
`BAUM HEDLUND ARISTEI
` & GOLDMAN, P.C.
`10940 Wilshire Blvd., 17th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90024
`Telephone: (310) 207-3233
`Facsimile: (310) 820-7444
`Email: rbwisner@baumhedlundlaw.com
`Counsel for Alva Pilliod and Alberta Pilliod
`
`
`David J. Wool, Esq.
`ANDRUS WAGSTAFF, PC
`7171 W. Alaska Dr.
`Lakewood, CO 80226
`Phone: 303-376-6360
`Fax: 303-376-6361
`Email: david.wool@andruswagstaff.com
`Counsel for Edwin Hardeman
`
`Jennifer A. Moore, Esq.
`MOORE LAW GROUP, PLLC
`1473 South 4th Street
`Louisville, KY 40208
`Telephone: (502) 717-4080
`Facsimile: (502) 717-4086
`Email: jennifer@moorelawgroup.com
`(Application for Admission Forthcoming)
`Counsel for Edwin Hardeman
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 21-10994 Date Filed: 04/22/2021 Page: 2 of 8
`
`John Carson vs. Monsanto Co. Appeal No. 21-10994
`U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
`
`CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS
`AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (CIP)
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 27 and Eleventh
`
`
`
`
`
`Circuit Rules 26.1-1, and 27-1(a)(9), undersigned counsel for Edwin Hardeman,
`
`Alva Pilliod, and Alberta Pilliod certifies that to their knowledge the following
`
`persons or entities not yet disclosed by the parties to this action may have an
`
`interest in the outcome of this appeal:
`
`1. Edwin Hardeman, who is a plaintiff with an appeal pending before the
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit where Appellee
`
`Monsanto Company is the Appellant;
`
`2. Alva Pilliod, who is a plaintiff with an appeal pending before the California
`
`Court of Appeals where Appellee Monsanto Company is the Appellant;
`
`3. Alberta Pilliod, who is a plaintiff with an appeal pending before the
`
`California Court of Appeals where Appellee Monsanto Company is the
`
`Appellant;
`
`4. David J. Wool, Counsel for Edwin Hardeman;
`
`5. R. Brent Wisner, Counsel for Alva Pilliod and Alberta Pilliod;
`
`6. Jennifer A. Moore, Counsel for Edwin Hardeman.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 21-10994 Date Filed: 04/22/2021 Page: 3 of 8
`
`/s/ David Wool _
`David J. Wool, Esq.
`ANDRUS WAGSTAFF, PC
`7171 W. Alaska Dr.
`Lakewood, CO 80226
`Phone: 303-376-6360
`Fax: 303-376-6361
`Email: david.wool@andruswagstaff.com
`Counsel for Edwin Hardeman
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 21-10994 Date Filed: 04/22/2021 Page: 4 of 8
`
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LETTER BRIEF
`
`Edwin Hardeman, Alva Pilliod, and Alberta Pilliod, by counsel, move for
`
`
`
`
`leave to file the attached letter and accompanying declaration in Carson v.
`
`Monsanto Co., No. 21-10994.
`
`1. The issues raised in the attached letter brief and accompanying declaration
`
`address the “settlement” agreement between the Appellant and Appellee in
`
`Carson, which directly impacts the justiciability of this appeal. Indeed, as
`
`explained in the attached letter and accompanying declaration, the Carson
`
`appeal is being prosecuted in bad faith. The Appellee (Monsanto) is paying
`
`the Appellant (Carson) to appeal a decision that the Appellee already won in
`
`the District Court because the Appellee is hoping to secure favorable
`
`appellate precedent in this Court. This pay-to-appeal scheme is
`
`fundamentally improper and must be brought to the Court’s attention.
`
`2. Hardeman and the Pilliods have a strong interest in ensuring this appeal, to
`
`the extent it is even properly before this Court, is vigorously and legally
`
`litigated because they have their own appeals pending before the United
`
`States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Hardeman) and California
`
`Court of Appeals (Pilliod) involving, in part, the same preemption issue that
`
`is at the heart of the “appeal” in Carson.
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 21-10994 Date Filed: 04/22/2021 Page: 5 of 8
`
`3. Because there is no defined mechanism to notify the Court of these issues,
`
`this Motion for Leave is styled as a “Motion to Intervene,” in the CM/ECF
`
`system. However, neither Hardeman nor Pilliod seek to intervene in this
`
`matter; they merely seek leave to file the attached letter and declaration to
`
`provide the Court with information impacting the validity of the appeal.
`
`4. As explained in the accompanying letter, the Court should dismiss this
`
`appeal outright or, at the very least, investigate the underlying “settlement”
`
`agreement and any communications evidencing the same to ensure this
`
`appeal is justiciable and being litigated in good faith. However, should the
`
`Court entertain the Carson appeal on the merits, Hardeman and the Pilliods
`
`will seek leave of the Court to file an amicus brief on the merits.
`
`WHEREFORE, we respectfully request that this Court grant leave to file the
`
`attached letter brief and accompanying declaration.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 22, 2021
`
`/s/ David J. Wool _
`David J. Wool, Esq.
`david.wool@andruswagstaff.com
`ANDRUS WAGSTAFF, P.C.
`7171 West Alaska Drive
`Lakewood CO 80226
`Telephone: (303) 376-6360
`Facsimile: (303) 376-6361
`Counsel for Edwin Hardeman
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/s/R. Brent Wisner _
`R. Brent Wisner, Esq.
`rbwisner@baumhedlundlaw.com
`BAUM HEDLUND ARISTEI
` & GOLDMAN, P.C.
`10940 Wilshire Blvd., 17th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90024
`Telephone: (310) 207-3233
`Facsimile: (310) 820-7444
`Counsel for Alva Pilliod and Alberta
`Pilliod
`
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 21-10994 Date Filed: 04/22/2021 Page: 6 of 8
`
`
`
`/s/ Jennifer A. Moore
`Jennifer A. Moore, Esq.
`jennifer@moorelawgroup.com
`MOORE LAW GROUP, PLLC
`1473 South 4th Street
`Louisville, KY 40208
`Telephone: (502) 717-4080
`Facsimile: (502) 717-4086
`(Application for Admission Forthcoming)
`Counsel for Edwin Hardeman
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 21-10994 Date Filed: 04/22/2021 Page: 7 of 8
`
`CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH TYPE-VOLUME LIMIT,
`TYPEFACE REQUIREMENTS, AND TYPE-STYLE REQUIREMENTS
`
`Check the appropriate box in section 1, and check the box in section 2.
`
`1.
`
`✔
`(cid:1703)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:1703)(cid:3)
`
`2.
`
`✔
`(cid:1703)(cid:3)
`
`Type-Volume
`
`This document complies with the word limit of FRAP
`27(d)(2)(A)
`because, excluding the parts of the document exempted by FRAP 32(f) and
`, this document contains
`
`347
`
`or
`
`words.
`
`This brief complies with the line limit of FRAP
`[insert Rule citation]
`excluding the parts of the brief exempted by FRAP 32(f) and
`, this brief uses a monospaced
`[insert applicable Rule citation, if any]
`lines of text.
`typeface and contains
`[state the number of]
`
`because,
`
`Typeface and Type-Style
`
`This document complies with the typeface requirements of FRAP 32(a)(5) and the
`type-style requirements of FRAP 32(a)(6).
`
`David Wool
`(s)_____________________________
`Edwin Hardeman
`Attorney for ____________________
`4/22/2021
`Dated: _________________________
`
`Rev.: 12/16
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 21-10994 Date Filed: 04/22/2021 Page: 8 of 8
`
`Carson v. Monsanto Co., No. 21-10994
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28
`
`
`
`U.S.C. § 1746 that on April 22, 2021, he filed the foregoing Motion by using the
`
`Court’s CM/ECF system, and that such filing effected service of the Motion for
`
`Leave on all counsel who are CM/ECF participants in this case.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ David Wool _
`David J. Wool, Esq.
`ANDRUS WAGSTAFF, PC
`7171 W. Alaska Dr.
`Lakewood, CO 80226
`Phone: 303-376-6360
`Fax: 303-376-6361
`Email: david.wool@andruswagstaff.com
`Counsel for Edwin Hardeman
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket