throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`USCA11 Case: 23-13156 Document: 40 Date Filed: 02/16/2024 Page: 1 of 7
`
`Appeal No. 23-13156-F
`In the United States Court of
`Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
`
`
`
`ATHOS OVERSEAS LIMITED CORP.,
`Appellant,
`
`v.
`
`YOUTUBE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, and
`GOOGLE, LLC,
`Appellees.
`
`On Appeal from the United States District Court
`for the Southern District of Florida
`Case No. 21-cv-21698-DPG
`
`
`APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
`TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
`
`
`Omar Ortega
`Rey Dorta
`Rosdaisy Rodriguez
`Dorta & Ortega, PA
`Attorneys for Appellant
`3860 SW 8th Street, PH
`Coral Gables, Florida 33134
`Phone: 305-461-5454
`Email: oortega@dortaandortega.com
`Email: rdorta@dortaandortega.com
`Email:rrodriguez@dortaandortega.com
`
`
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 23-13156 Document: 40 Date Filed: 02/16/2024 Page: 2 of 7
`Athos Overseas Limited Corp. v. YouTube, Inc., et. al., No. 23-13156-F (11th Cir.)
`
`
`
`Eleventh Circuit Rule 26.1 Certificate of Interested Persons
`
`
`Athos Overseas Limited Corp. (Appellant)
`
`Byrd, Dylan (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Cine Estelar, Inc.
`
`Cine Nostalgia, Inc.
`
`Coulter, David T (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Dorta & Ortega, P.A. (counsel for Appellant)
`
`Dorta, Reinaldo (counsel for Appellant)
`
`Gente de Cine, S.A.
`
`Google LLC (Appellee)
`
`Gorman, Nathalie M. (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Green Anaba, Ariel C. (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Hartman, Catherine R. (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Li, Luis (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Ortega, Omar (counsel for Appellant)
`
`Reed, Jenea M. (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Rodriguez, Rosdaisy (counsel for Appellant)
`
`Shapiro, Jay B (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Stearn Weaver Miller Weisller Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Templeton, Trevor (counsel for Appellee)
`
`C-1 of 2
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 23-13156 Document: 40 Date Filed: 02/16/2024 Page: 3 of 7
`Athos Overseas Limited Corp. v. YouTube, Inc., et. al., No. 23-13156-F (11th Cir.)
`
`
`
`Top Entertainment Products, Inc.
`
`Top Products Investments, Inc.
`
`Tuttle, Eric (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Vasallo, Carlos
`
`Willen, Brian M (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Yen, Lucy (counsel for Appellee)
`
`Youtube, LLC (Appellee)
`
`Appellant certifies that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its
`
`stock.
`
`
`
`
`C-2 of 2
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 23-13156 Document: 40 Date Filed: 02/16/2024 Page: 4 of 7
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
`APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF
`
`Appellant, Athos Overseas Limited Corp., pursuant to Federal Rule of
`
`Appellate Procedure 26(b) and Eleventh Circuit Rule 31-2, respectfully requests a
`
`ten-day extension of time to serve its Reply Brief, and in support thereof states as
`
`follows:
`
`1. Appellant filed its Initial Brief on December 6, 2023.
`
`2. On February 5, 2024, Appellees filed their Brief.
`
`3. Appellant’s Reply Brief is currently due on February 26, 2024.
`
`4. The undersigned counsel is in the midst of preparing for a final evidentiary
`
`hearing in an arbitration before the American Arbitration Association
`
`commencing on February 19, 2024, and scheduled to conclude on February
`
`21, 2024.
`
`5. The undersigned counsel has also been preparing for an all-day evidentiary
`
`hearing being held on February 16, 2024, in the matter of In re: The marriage
`
`of Keith Kurland and Evelyn C. Kurland, Case NO. FMCE 18-001932 (33).
`
`6. Therefore, the undersigned counsel respectfully requests a ten-day extension
`
`of time to file Appellant’s Reply Brief on March 7, 2024.
`
`7. Appellant’s counsel has conferred with Appellees’ counsel regarding the
`
`extension requested and Appellees’ counsel has no objection to the
`
`enlargement of time.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 23-13156 Document: 40 Date Filed: 02/16/2024 Page: 5 of 7
`
`8. This request is made for good cause, in good faith, and not for the purpose of
`
`delaying resolution of this appeal.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Appellant respectfully requests this Court grants an
`
`extension of time until March 7, 2024, to file its Reply Brief.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DORTA & ORTEGA, P.A.
`
`/s/ Omar Ortega_________________
`Omar Ortega, Esq.
`Florida Bar No.095117
`Rey Dorta, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 0084920
`Rosdaisy Rodriguez, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 0112710
`3860 SW 8th Street, PH
`Coral Gables, Florida 33134
`Phone: (305)461-5454
`Facsimile: (305)461-5226
`Email: oortega@dortaandortega.com
`Email: rdorta@dortaandortega.com
`Email: rrodriguez@dortaandortega.com
`
`Attorneys for Appellant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 23-13156 Document: 40 Date Filed: 02/16/2024 Page: 6 of 7
`
`CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
`
`Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 32(g), I certify the foregoing document complies
`
`with the type-volume limitations of Fed. R. App. P. 27(d)(2)(A) because it contains
`
`239 words, as created by Microsoft Word, excluding the items that may be excluded
`
`under Fed. R. App. P. 32(f).
`
`Dated: February 16, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Omar Ortega
`Omar Ortega, Esq.
`Attorney for Appellant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`USCA11 Case: 23-13156 Document: 40 Date Filed: 02/16/2024 Page: 7 of 7
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` certify that on February 16, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing with
`
` I
`
`the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit by using the CM/ECF
`
`system which will send a notice of electronic filing to appellees’ counsel of record
`
`who are registered CM/ECF users.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Omar Ortega
`Omar Ortega, Esq.
`Attorney for Appellant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket