`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE SOLUTIONS,
`LLC,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF
`COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
`AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
`Intervenor
`______________________
`
`2015-1928
`______________________
`
`Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-
`00183.
`
`______________________
`
`ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING
`______________________
`
`Before NEWMAN, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
`
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 2
`
` BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE v. IANCU
`
`O R D E R
`The United States Patent and Trademark Office peti-
`tions for panel rehearing of this court’s December 22,
`2017 opinion, seeking to “clarify a sentence in its prece-
`dential opinion that could give rise to needless misunder-
`standings in the future.” Specifically, the USPTO raised
`the concern that the court’s opinion could be read, incor-
`rectly, to have interpreted 35 U.S.C. 316(e). Bosch Auto-
`motive Service Solutions, LLC responded, in a way that
`supported the USPTO’s view that the opinion could be
`improperly misread. To avoid that unnecessary possibil-
`ity, we grant the petition for the limited purpose of
`amending our earlier opinion.
`The sentence beginning at page 22, line 29 is amend-
`ed to read: “Rather, the petitioner bears the burden of
`proving that the proposed amended claims are unpatent-
`able by a preponderance of the evidence.”
`Accordingly,
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`The petition is granted to the limited extent noted
`above.
`
`
`
`March 15, 2018
`
` Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` FOR THE COURT
`
` /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
` Peter R. Marksteiner
` Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
