throbber
Case: 21-1377 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 02/19/2021
`
`No. 21-1377
`
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED
`
`v.
`
`FACEBOOK INC.
`
`Appellant,
`
`Appellee.
`
`APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, PATENT TRIAL
`AND APPEAL BOARD IN INTER PARTES REVIEW NO. IPR2019-00925
`
`MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
`OF APPEAL NO. 21-1377
`
`
`
`Robert Courtney
`Michael T. Hawkins
`Nicholas Stephens
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`60 South 6th Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: (612) 335-5070
`courtney@fr.com
`hawkins@fr.com
`nstephens@fr.com
`
`February 19, 2021
`
`Attorneys for Appellant
`
`

`

`Case: 21-1377 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 02/19/2021
`
`Pursuant to Federal Circuit Rules of Appellate Procedure 27 and 42(b),
`
`and Federal Circuit Rule 27, Appellant BlackBerry Limited (“BlackBerry”)
`
`respectfully moves for voluntary dismissal of Appeal No. 2021-1377, with
`
`each party bearing its own costs. All appropriate fees for this appeal have
`
`been paid, and none are outstanding.
`
`Good cause exists for granting the present motion. BlackBerry hereby
`
`states that conserving the resources of the parties and the Court now
`
`outweighs any disagreement with the determination of the Patent Trial &
`
`Appeal Board addressed by the 2021-1377 appeal. In view of this, the
`
`requested relief would promote efficiency for all concerned, and would not
`
`prejudice any party.
`
`Pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 27(a)(2), BlackBerry represents that it
`
`sought Facebook’s position on the present motion on February 18, 2021 via
`
`email. On February 19, 2021, Facebook filed a letter (ECF #9) stating that
`
`would not be participating in the present appeal, and from that statement
`
`BlackBerry concludes that Facebook does not oppose the requested relief.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case: 21-1377 Document: 10 Page: 3 Filed: 02/19/2021
`
`Dated: February 19, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` /s/ Robert Courtney
`Robert Courtney
`Michael T. Hawkins
`Nicholas Stephens
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`60 South 6th Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 335-5070
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case: 21-1377 Document: 10 Page: 4 Filed: 02/19/2021
`
`CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST
`
`Counsel for Appellant BlackBerry Limited (“BlackBerry”) certifies the
`
`following:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`Provide the full names of all entities represented by undersigned
`counsel in this case.
`
`BlackBerry Limited
`
`Provide the full names of all real parties in interest for the entities. Do
`not list the real parties if they are the same as the entities.
`
`None/Not Applicable
`
`Provide the full names of all parent corporations for the entities and all
`publicly held companies that own 10% or more stock in the entities.
`
`None/Not Applicable
`
`List all law firms, partners, and associates that (a) appeared for the
`entities in the originating court or agency or (b) are expected to appear
`in this court for the entities. Do not include those who have already
`entered an appearance in this court. Fed. Cir. R. 47.4(a)(4).
`
`Fish & Richardson P.C.: Kenneth W. Darby, Craig A. Deutsch, Kim
`Leung
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urqhart & Sullivan, LLP: Ognjen Zivojnovic, Sam
`Stake, James M. Glass
`
`Provide the case titles and numbers of any case known to be pending in
`this court or any other court or agency that will directly affect or be
`directly affected by this court’s decision in the pending appeal. Do not
`include the originating case number(s) for this case. Fed. Cir. R.
`47.4(a)(5). See also Fed. Cir. R. 47.5(b).
`
`None/Not Applicable
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case: 21-1377 Document: 10 Page: 5 Filed: 02/19/2021
`
`6.
`
`Provide any information required under Fed. R. App. P. 26.1(b)
`(organizational victims in criminal cases) and 26.1(c) (bankruptcy case
`debtors and trustees). Fed. Cir. R. 47.4(a)(6).
`
`Not applicable
`
`February 19, 2021
`
`/s/ Robert Courtney
`Robert Courtney
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case: 21-1377 Document: 10 Page: 6 Filed: 02/19/2021
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND FILING
`
`I certify that on February 19, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing
`
`MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF APPEAL NO. 21-1377 of
`
`appellant using the Court’s CM/ECF filing system. Counsel for appellee were
`
`electronically served by and through the Court’s CM/ECF filing system per
`
`Fed. R. App. P. 25 and Fed. Cir. R. 25(e).
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Robert Courtney
`Robert Courtney
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case: 21-1377 Document: 10 Page: 7 Filed: 02/19/2021
`
`CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
`
`I certify that this motion complies with the type-volume limitation of
`
`Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(d)(2)(A). The motion contains 165
`
`words, excluding the parts of the motion authorized by Fed. R. App. P.
`
`27(a)(2)(B). This motion has been prepared in a proportionally spaced
`
`typeface using Microsoft Word 2016 in Cambria, 14 Point.
`
`
`
`Dated: February 19, 2021
`
`/s/ Robert Courtney
`Robert Courtney
`
`
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket