`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`BRUCE OLSEN, NANCY OLSEN, STEVEN
`SAHINEN, ANGEL SAHINEN, ERIC DAVIS,
`KATHERINE HOPE DAVIS, SHARON CALLISON,
`TOM BRACKIN, KATHY BRACKIN, MARIO G.
`DUENAS, OMAR CANO, OLSA CANO, B.N.
`MURALI, JAMUNA MURALI, ROGER SCHULTZ,
`DEBRA SCHULTZ, JOE BONO, BRENDA BONO,
`DANIEL RICHARDSON, JANICE RICHARDSON,
`GORDON MILLER, SHERRA MILLER, TODD
`FORESTER, KELLI KICKERILLO, MARYWOOD
`HOMEOWNER’S ASSOCIATION, INC., VINCENT D.
`KICKERILLO, MARY F. KICKERILLO, KEITH
`DARBY, BEVERLY WINTER DONAHO,
`CHARLOTTE EFTEKHAR, BUCKMINSTER
`FARROW, SUZANNE FARROW, PATTY GRAY,
`GARY ROTH, TERRIE ROTH, MASON THILMAN,
`AMANDA THILMAN, MATTHEW SALO, GABRIELA
`SALO, on behalf of themselves and all other simi-
`larly situated persons and entities, JACQUELINE
`WILLIAMSON, KIRK E. WILLIAMSON, II, ZAVIK
`ABED-STEPHEN, HULAK ABED-STEPHEN, FRED
`R. ARMSTRONG, CINDA S. ARMSTRONG,
`RAYMOND BOSSOTTI, ELIZABETH G. BOSSOTTI,
`ROSALIE BRANDINO AQUILINA, NANCY N.
`BURGER, KEVIN BURKE, KRISTEN BURKE, JOAN
`C. ALFORD, MELISSA ALMARIO, ANA ALVAREZ,
`CHAUNCE BEANE, LAURA BEANE, JOHN F.
`BEASLEY, MARCHETA BEASLEY, ENEX, INC.,
`DOROTHY BLODGETT, JOSEPH BRADEN, SUSAN
`BRADEN, ALBERT ALLEN, DEBRA ALLEN, ALEX
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case: 21-2034 Document: 26 Page: 2 Filed: 08/30/2022
`
`2
`
`
`
`OLSEN v. US
`
`ABDOLLAH ARJOMAND, MICHAEL BARRY, II,
`WILLIAM BEGMAN, MARGO BEGMAN, ALBERT
`BUTLER, JUDY BUTLER, ARACELY HARRIS,
`BILLY HARRIS, FATEMEH ASGHARI, ALIREZA
`SAFAR, RYAN L. BICKLEY, JENNIFER R.
`BICKLEY, ROBERT ERWIN, MILLICENT ERWIN,
`LAWRENCE KELLY, LORRAINE KELLY,
`JONATHAN LEAN, EMMA LEAN, LYNN ASHBY,
`ALFRED DANFORTH, CARLOTA DANFORTH, E.J.
`GRIVETTI, IGOR VELASCO-SANCHEZ, VICTOR
`CHAO, JENNY CHAO, DAVID MAY, ANN MAY,
`MICHAEL UPCHURCH, KATHARINA UPCHURCH,
`Plaintiffs-Appellants
`
`ANNA GRIFFITH,
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`UNITED STATES,
`Defendant-Appellee
`______________________
`
`2021-2034, 2021-2042, 2021-2043, 2021-2044, 2021-2045,
`2021-2052, 2021-2054, 2021-2055, 2021-2056, 2021-2058
`______________________
`
`Appeals from the United States Court of Federal
`Claims in Nos. 1:17-cv-01194-LAS, 1:17-cv-01456-LAS,
`1:17-cv-09002-LAS, 1:18-cv-00123-LAS, 1:18-cv-00345-
`LAS, 1:19-cv-00698-LAS, 1:19-cv-00782-LAS, 1:19-cv-
`00807-LAS, 1:19-cv-01063-LAS, 1:19-cv-01266-LAS, and
`1:19-cv-01924-LAS, Senior Judge Loren A. Smith.
`______________________
`
`ON MOTION
`______________________
`
`
`
`
`Case: 21-2034 Document: 26 Page: 3 Filed: 08/30/2022
`
`OLSEN v. US
`
` 3
`
`Before LOURIE, CHEN, and STARK, Circuit Judges.
`PER CURIAM.
`
`O R D E R
`The appellants move unopposed to lift the stay and re-
`
`mand to the United States Court of Federal Claims for ad-
`ditional proceedings in light of this court’s decision in
`Milton v. United States, Appeal Nos. 2021-1131 et al.,
`which involved a similar challenge to a Court of Federal
`Claims’ decision dismissing takings claims predicated on
`flooding that occurred when the Army Corps of Engineers
`opened floodgates during Hurricane Harvey.
` Upon consideration thereof,
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`(1) The motion is granted. The stay is lifted, and the
`
`case is remanded to the Court of Federal Claims for further
`proceedings consistent with Milton.
`
`(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
`
`FOR THE COURT
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
` August 30, 2022
` Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 30, 2022
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
