`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`ALEXANDER LITZ,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`TECH GURU, LLC,
`Appellee
`______________________
`
`2021-2375
`______________________
`
`Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`in
`No. 91214713.
`
`______________________
`
`ON MOTION
`______________________
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`O R D E R
` Alexander Litz moves to voluntarily withdraw his ap-
`peal “without the imposition of cost or attorney fees.” Mot.
`at 1. Tech Guru, LLC responds and “does not object to [Mr.]
`Litz’s withdrawal of his appeal, but it disagrees with [Mr.]
`Litz’s request that such withdrawal occur without the im-
`position of costs or attorney fees” because it “continues to
`believe that [Mr.] Litz’s appeal is frivolous and that it has
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case: 21-2375 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 09/15/2022
`
`2
`
`
`
`LITZ v. TECH GURU, LLC
`
`been pursued for purposes of vexatiousness.” ECF No. 38
`at 1.
` Upon consideration thereof,
`
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`
`The court has sua sponte determined that the award of
`attorneys’ fees and costs is not appropriate. Mr. Litz’s mo-
`tion is granted to the extent the appeal is dismissed with
`each party to bear its own costs.
`
`
` September 15, 2022
` Date
`
`FOR THE COURT
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 15, 2022
`
`