`
`NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD.,
`Appellants
`
`v.
`
`HULU, LLC,
`Appellee
`______________________
`
`2022-1990, 2022-1991
`______________________
`
`Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-
`00298, IPR2021-00304.
`______________________
`
`JUDGMENT
`______________________
`
`STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons,
`VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES
`CARMICHAEL, MINGHUI YANG; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW,
`RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG,
`KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA.
`
` BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny & Myers
`LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also repre-
`sented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN;
`
`
`
`Case: 22-1990 Document: 60 Page: 2 Filed: 04/05/2024
`
`
`
`NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA; AMY LIANG, San
`Francisco, CA.
` ______________________
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
` PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit
`Judges).
`
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`
` ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`April 5, 2024
`Date
`
`
`
`
`
`