throbber
Case: 23-2152 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 03/26/2024
`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`GERALD MITCHELL,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
`Respondent
`______________________
`
`2023-2152
`______________________
`
`Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
`Board in Nos. AT-0831-19-0078-I-1 and AT-844E-13-3694-
`I-1.
`
`______________________
`
`Before DYK, WALLACH, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.
`PER CURIAM.
`
`O R D E R
`In response to the court’s December 8, 2023 order to
`
`show cause, the Merit Systems Protection Board urges
`transfer of Gerald Mitchell’s petition for review with re-
`spect to MSPB Docket No. AT-844E-13-3694-I-1 and dis-
`missal with respect to No. AT-0831-19-0078-I-1. Mr.
`Mitchell opposes dismissal and moves for various relief.
`
`In No. AT-844E-13-3694-I-1, Mr. Mitchell challenged
`the Office of Personnel Management’s decision denying
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 23-2152 Document: 43 Page: 2 Filed: 03/26/2024
`
`2
`
`
`
`MITCHELL v. MSPB
`
`him disability retirement benefits, alleging discrimination
`on the basis of his disability. In 2013, the administrative
`judge dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction when
`OPM rescinded the challenged decision.
`In 2018, Mr. Mitchell filed No. AT-0831-19-0078-I-1 to
`challenge OPM’s alleged discriminatory and retaliatory
`failure to respond to his requests for information and doc-
`uments related to his disability retirement benefits. In
`April 2019, the Board’s administrative judge dismissed the
`appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Mitchell then filed sep-
`arate petitions for Board review in both cases.
`On May 1, 2023, the Board joined the two petitions for
`administrative convenience, dismissed the petition as to
`No. AT-844E-13-3694-I-1 as untimely, and denied the peti-
`tion as to No. AT-0831-19-0078-I-1, affirming the dismissal
`in that case. On July 10, 2023, this court received Mr.
`Mitchell’s petition seeking judicial review of the Board’s
`May 1, 2023 decision. Mr. Mitchell’s filings here state that
`he wishes to pursue judicial review of his discrimination
`claims.
`As to No. AT-844E-13-3694-I-1, we agree with the
`Board that we lack jurisdiction. Federal district courts, not
`this court, have jurisdiction over “[c]ases of discrimination
`subject to the provisions of [5 U.S.C.] § 7702,” i.e., “mixed
`cases” involving adverse personnel actions appealable to
`the Board and allegations of covered discrimination.
`5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 582 U.S.
`420, 432 (2017); Ash v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 25 F.4th 1009,
`1011 (Fed. Cir. 2022).
`Given Mr. Mitchell’s ongoing pursuit of discrimination
`claims in No. AT-844E-13-3694-I-1, that case is outside our
`jurisdiction. We conclude that transfer to the United
`States District Court for the District of Columbia is appro-
`priate under 28 U.S.C. § 1631. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3)
`(providing that discrimination cases brought pursuant to 5
`
`

`

`Case: 23-2152 Document: 43 Page: 3 Filed: 03/26/2024
`
`MITCHELL v. MSPB
`
` 3
`
`U.S.C. § 7702 “may be brought within the judicial district
`in which the respondent has his principal office.”).
`As to No. AT-0831-19-0078-I-1, we dismiss. Under cur-
`rent precedent, the filing deadline is mandatory and juris-
`dictional. See Fedora v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 848 F.3d
`1013, 1016 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Here, Mr. Mitchell’s petition
`was received outside of that deadline. Even assuming eq-
`uitable tolling is available, Mr. Mitchell has shown no basis
`for tolling here based only on a vague recollection of “some
`technical issue(s) with his computer system and/or printer
`and scanner and/or internet,” or “something of that nature”
`and “difficulty figuring out how to make thing[s] happen
`using the FedEx Office Store equipment.” ECF No. 20 at 1.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`(1) MSPB Docket No. AT-844E-13-3694-I-1 is trans-
`ferred to the United States District Court for the District
`of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
`(2) This matter is dismissed as to MSPB Docket No.
`AT-0831-19-0078-I-1.
`(3) All pending motions are denied.
`
`
`FOR THE COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`March 26, 2024
` Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket