`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`ELOY MASCORRO,
`Plaintiff-Appellant
`
`v.
`
`THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, THE SAN DIEGO
`POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE SAN DIEGO CHIEF
`OF POLICE, OFFICERS 1-4,
`Defendants-Appellees
`______________________
`
`2024-1497
`______________________
`
`Appeal from the United States District Court for the
`Southern District of California in No. 3:21-cv-01725-RSH-
`DDL, Judge Robert S. Huie.
`______________________
`
`Before CHEN, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
`PER CURIAM.
`
`O R D E R
`Eloy Mascorro appeals from the United States District
`Court for the Southern District of California’s dismissal of
`his civil rights action against the listed defendants. In re-
`sponse to the court’s March 14, 2024 order to show cause,
`Mr. Mascorro urges transfer to the United States Court of
`Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case: 24-1497 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 04/11/2024
`
`2
`
`
`
`MASCORRO v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO
`
`Our jurisdiction to review decisions of federal district
`courts generally extends only to cases arising under the pa-
`tent laws, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review
`to the district court from the United States Patent and
`Trademark Office, see § 1295(a)(4)(C); or cases involving
`certain damages claims against the United States “not ex-
`ceeding $10,000 in amount,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), see 28
`U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(1). This case is out-
`side of that limited subject matter jurisdiction. We may
`transfer to another court, if it is in the interest of justice,
`where “the action or appeal could have been brought at the
`time it was filed.” 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Here, the court con-
`cludes it appropriate to transfer to the Ninth Circuit. 28
`U.S.C. §§ 41, 1291.
`Accordingly,
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`The appeal and all its filings are transferred to the
`United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pur-
`suant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`April 11, 2024
` Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
