`
`
`
`FORM 26. Docketing Statement
`
`Form 26 (p. 1)
`
`July 2020
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`
`FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
`
`DOCKETING STATEMENT
`
`Case Number:
`
`Short Case Caption:
`
`
`
`Filing Party/Entity:
`
`------------------------
`
`Instructions: Complete each section or check the box if a section is intentionally
`
`blank or not applicable. Attach additional pages as needed. Refer to the court's
`
`
`
`Mediation Guidelines fOl' filing requirements. An amended docketing statement is
`
`required for each new appeal or cross-appeal consolidated after first filing.
`
`Case Origin
`
`
`
`Originating Number
`
`Type of Case
`
`Relief sought on appeal: D None/Not Applicable
`
`Relief awarded below (if dam ages, specify): D None/Not Applicable
`
`
`
`Briefly describe the judgment/order appealed from:
`
`Nature of judgment (select one): Date of judgment:
`
`-------
`
`□Final Judgment, 28 USC § 1295
`□Rule 54(b)
`
`
`D Othe1· (explain)
`
`type) ______________ D Interlocutory Order (specify
`
`_
`
`2024-2171, 2024-2172
`
`Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.
`
`Axonics, Inc.
`
`PTAB
`
`2020-712, 2020-680
`
`inter partes review
`
`Reversal of the Board's findings that claims 3-6, 9-12, and 15-18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,738,148
`and claims 1, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,457,758 have not been shown to be unpatentable.
`
`The Board issued a Final Written Decision finding that claims 3-6, 9-12, and 15-18 of U.S.
`Patent No. 8,738,148 and claims 1, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,457,758 have not been shown
`to be unpatentable.
`
`Final Written Decision finding that claims 3-6, 9-12, and 15-18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,738,148
`and claims 1, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,457,758 have not been shown to be unpatentable.
`
`4
`
`Final Written Decision under 35 U.S.C. §§ 144, 318
`
`5/30/24
`
`
`
`Case: 24-2171 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 08/19/2024
`
`F ORM 26. Docketing Statem ent
`
`Form 26 (p . 2)
`July 2020
`
`Name and docket number of an y r elated cases pen din g before th is court, and t h e
`name of the writing judge if an opinion was issu ed. D None/Not Applicable
`
`Issu es to be raised on a ppeal : D None/Not Applicable
`
`Have t h er e been discu ssion s with oth er part ies relating to settlement of th is case?
`D
`
`Yes □ No
`
`If "yes," wh en were the last su ch discu ssions?
`D Befor e the case was filed below
`D During t h e pendency of t h e case below
`D Following the ju dgment/order a ppealed from
`
`If "yes," wer e the settlement discu ssions mediat ed?
`
`D Yes
`
`0 No
`
`If they were mediated, by w horn?
`
`Do you believe that this case m ay be amen able t o mediation ? D Yes D No
`
`Explain .
`
`Provide any other inform ation r elevant to the inclusion of t his case in t h e court's
`mediation program.
`
`Dat e:
`
`Sign ature:
`
`Name:
`
`Save for Filing
`
`4
`
`Whether the Board properly found that claims 3-6, 9-12, and 15-18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,738,148 have not been shown to be unpatentable,
`and the underlying findings, determinations, rulings, opinions, orders, issues, and decisions relating to those determinations.
`
`4
`
`Lester Savit
`
`4
`
`Mediation is unlikely to aid the parties in resolving their disputes at this stage of
`the proceedings.
`
`Matthew D. Powers
`
`8/19/24
`
`/s/ Matthew D. Powers
`
`4
`
`4
`
`