throbber
Case: 24-2171 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 08/19/2024
`
`
`
`FORM 26. Docketing Statement
`
`Form 26 (p. 1)
`
`July 2020
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`
`FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
`
`DOCKETING STATEMENT
`
`Case Number:
`
`Short Case Caption:
`
`
`
`Filing Party/Entity:
`
`------------------------
`
`Instructions: Complete each section or check the box if a section is intentionally
`
`blank or not applicable. Attach additional pages as needed. Refer to the court's
`
`
`
`Mediation Guidelines fOl' filing requirements. An amended docketing statement is
`
`required for each new appeal or cross-appeal consolidated after first filing.
`
`Case Origin
`
`
`
`Originating Number
`
`Type of Case
`
`Relief sought on appeal: D None/Not Applicable
`
`Relief awarded below (if dam ages, specify): D None/Not Applicable
`
`
`
`Briefly describe the judgment/order appealed from:
`
`Nature of judgment (select one): Date of judgment:
`
`-------
`
`□Final Judgment, 28 USC § 1295
`□Rule 54(b)
`
`
`D Othe1· (explain)
`
`type) ______________ D Interlocutory Order (specify
`
`_
`
`2024-2171, 2024-2172
`
`Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.
`
`Axonics, Inc.
`
`PTAB
`
`2020-712, 2020-680
`
`inter partes review
`
`Reversal of the Board's findings that claims 3-6, 9-12, and 15-18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,738,148
`and claims 1, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,457,758 have not been shown to be unpatentable.
`
`The Board issued a Final Written Decision finding that claims 3-6, 9-12, and 15-18 of U.S.
`Patent No. 8,738,148 and claims 1, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,457,758 have not been shown
`to be unpatentable.
`
`Final Written Decision finding that claims 3-6, 9-12, and 15-18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,738,148
`and claims 1, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,457,758 have not been shown to be unpatentable.
`
`4
`
`Final Written Decision under 35 U.S.C. §§ 144, 318
`
`5/30/24
`
`

`

`Case: 24-2171 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 08/19/2024
`
`F ORM 26. Docketing Statem ent
`
`Form 26 (p . 2)
`July 2020
`
`Name and docket number of an y r elated cases pen din g before th is court, and t h e
`name of the writing judge if an opinion was issu ed. D None/Not Applicable
`
`Issu es to be raised on a ppeal : D None/Not Applicable
`
`Have t h er e been discu ssion s with oth er part ies relating to settlement of th is case?
`D
`
`Yes □ No
`
`If "yes," wh en were the last su ch discu ssions?
`D Befor e the case was filed below
`D During t h e pendency of t h e case below
`D Following the ju dgment/order a ppealed from
`
`If "yes," wer e the settlement discu ssions mediat ed?
`
`D Yes
`
`0 No
`
`If they were mediated, by w horn?
`
`Do you believe that this case m ay be amen able t o mediation ? D Yes D No
`
`Explain .
`
`Provide any other inform ation r elevant to the inclusion of t his case in t h e court's
`mediation program.
`
`Dat e:
`
`Sign ature:
`
`Name:
`
`Save for Filing
`
`4
`
`Whether the Board properly found that claims 3-6, 9-12, and 15-18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,738,148 have not been shown to be unpatentable,
`and the underlying findings, determinations, rulings, opinions, orders, issues, and decisions relating to those determinations.
`
`4
`
`Lester Savit
`
`4
`
`Mediation is unlikely to aid the parties in resolving their disputes at this stage of
`the proceedings.
`
`Matthew D. Powers
`
`8/19/24
`
`/s/ Matthew D. Powers
`
`4
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket