throbber
Case: 24-2226 Document: 32 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2024
`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`VDPP, LLC,
`Plaintiff-Appellant
`
`v.
`
`VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.,
`Defendant-Appellee
`______________________
`
`2024-2226
`______________________
`
`Appeal from the United States District Court for the
`Southern District of Texas in No. 4:23-cv-02961, Judge Lee
`H. Rosenthal.
`
`______________________
`
`ON MOTION
`______________________
`
`Before REYNA, LINN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
`PER CURIAM.
`
`O R D E R
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 24-2226 Document: 32 Page: 2 Filed: 12/10/2024
`
`
`
` 2
`
`VDPP, LLC v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
`
` VDPP, LLC moves1 for relief from enforcement of the
`judgment. ECF Nos. 12 and 15. Volkswagen Group of
`America, Inc. responds. VDPP replies.
`The district court set a bond in the amount of
`$249,602.32, due December 23, 2024, and stayed enforce-
`ment of the judgment until that date. It denied requests to
`stay discovery during that time, to set a $0.00 bond, or to
`accept an alternative bond constituting purported evidence
`of a retirement account of VDPP’s attorney capable of sat-
`isfying the judgment. Movant(s) now seek that relief from
`this court or to set a bond of 10% or waive it entirely.
`Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Proce-
`dure authorizes this court to grant a stay pending appeal.
`We consider four factors: “(1) whether the [movant] is likely
`to succeed on the merits, (2) whether it will suffer irrepa-
`rable injury without a stay, (3) whether the stay will sub-
`stantially injure the other parties interested in the
`proceedings, and (4) where the public interest lies.” Ohio
`v. Env’t Prot. Agency, 603 U.S. 279, 291 (2024) (citing Nken
`v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009)); see also Standard Ha-
`vens Prods., Inc. v. Gencor Indus., Inc., 897 F.2d 511, 512–
`13 (Fed. Cir. 1990). On the basis of the papers submitted,
`we cannot say movant(s) have shown entitlement to the re-
`lief requested, and therefore deny the motion.
`Accordingly,
`
`
`
`1 The motion(s) purport to be made also on behalf of
`VDPP’s attorney, William P. Ramey, III. Separately before
`the court is an opposed motion to amend the caption to in-
`clude Mr. Ramey as an appellant. See ECF No. 21. The
`court will address that motion in due course. The briefing
`on this motion to stay, filed at least on behalf of VDPP, is
`sufficient for the court to decide ECF Nos. 12 and 15.
`
`

`

`Case: 24-2226 Document: 32 Page: 3 Filed: 12/10/2024
`
`VDPP, LLC v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
`
` 3
`
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`ECF Nos. 12 and 15 are denied.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`December 10, 2024
` Date
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket