`FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
`
`No. 03-41080
`Conference Calendar
`
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`Fifth Circuit
`F I L E D
`February 18, 2004
`
`Charles R. Fulbruge III
`Clerk
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`versus
`SANDRO MEDINA-TENIENTE,
`
`Plaintiff-Appellee,
`
`Defendant-Appellant.
`--------------------
`Appeal from the United States District Court
`for the Southern District of Texas
`USDC No. B-03-CR-357-ALL
`--------------------
`Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
`PER CURIAM:*
`Sandro Medina-Teniente pleaded guilty to being found
`unlawfully present in the United States after deportation, in
`violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that the special
`condition of supervised release that prohibits him from
`possessing a “dangerous weapon,” which is contained in the
`written judgment, conflicts with the district court’s oral
`pronouncement of sentence and must be deleted. His argument is
`foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v.
`
`* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
`that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
`except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
`R. 47.5.4.
`
`
`
`No. 03-41080
`-2-
`Torres-Aguilar, 352 F.3d 394, 937-38 (5th Cir. 2003). The
`judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
`The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of
`filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks
`that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
`AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.