throbber
Case: 17-60638 Document: 00514756693 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/11/2018
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
`
`
`No. 17-60638
`Summary Calendar
`
`
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`Fifth Circuit
`
`FILED
`December 11, 2018
`
`Lyle W. Cayce
`Clerk
`
`CORDELLRA MCCALEY,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff-Appellant
`
`v.
`
`
`PELICIA HALL, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF
`CORRECTIONS; JERRY WILLIAMS, Deputy Commissioner; TIMOTHY
`MORRIS, Warden, Mississippi Department of Corrections; OFFICER
`HUGHES, Correction Officer; M. S. CARTER, Case Manager; MR. BANKS,
`Deputy Warden,
`
`
`
`Defendants-Appellees
`
`
`
`Appeal from the United States District Court
`for the Northern District of Mississippi
`USDC No. 4:16-CV-111
`
`
`Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.
`PER CURIAM:*
`
`Cordellra McCaley, Mississippi prisoner # 164032, appeals the summary
`judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action alleging claims
`of deliberate indifference to his safety, deliberate indifference to his serious
`medical needs, and failure to properly classify him based on the defendants’
`
`
`* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
`be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
`CIR. R. 47.5.4.
`
`

`

` Case: 17-60638 Document: 00514756693 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/11/2018
`
`No. 17-60638
`
`
`actions before and after McCaley was assaulted and seriously injured by
`another inmate. McCaley also moves for appointment of counsel on appeal.
`
`“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion,
`if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). An appellate
`court’s jurisdiction vests upon filing of the notice of appeal. Griggs v. Provident
`Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982). “[A]n appeal filing deadline
`prescribed by statute will be regarded as jurisdictional.” Hamer v.
`Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chicago, 138 S. Ct. 13, 16 (2017) (internal
`quotation marks and citation omitted). In a civil matter, such as this one,
`notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the judgment or
`order being appealed. 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A).
`
`Although McCaley’s notice of appeal was filed more than four months
`after the Rule 4(a) deadline, we construe it as a timely motion to reopen the
`appeal filing period. See § 2107(c); FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(6). Accordingly, IT IS
`ORDERED that the case be REMANDED to the district court for the limited
`purpose of determining whether McCaley’s appeal should be reopened
`pursuant to Rule 4(a)(6). The district court is directed to return the case to
`this court for further proceedings or dismissal, as appropriate, once the ruling
`has been made. McCaley’s motion to appoint counsel is CARRIED WITH THE
`CASE.
`
`LIMITED REMAND ORDERED.
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket