`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Fifth Circuit
`____________
`
`No. 23-10378
`Summary Calendar
`____________
`
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`Fifth Circuit
`
`FILED
`October 18, 2023
`
`Lyle W. Cayce
`Clerk
`
`United States of America,
`
`
`
`
`versus
`
`
`Antonio Darviorus Gage,
`
`
`Plaintiff—Appellee,
`
`Defendant—Appellant.
`______________________________
`
`
`
`Appeal from the United States District Court
`for the Northern District of Texas
`USDC No. 3:20-CR-34-1
`______________________________
`
`
`Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
`Per Curiam:*
`
`The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Darviorus Gage has
`moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
`v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
`(5th Cir. 2011). Gage has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
`brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
`
`_____________________
`
`* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
`
`
`
`Case: 23-10378 Document: 00516935049 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2023
`
`No. 23-10378
`
`with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
`appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
`GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
`the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
`
`2
`
`