`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
`
`
`No. 19-6172
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
`
`
`
`
`
`HON. W. EARL BRITT; JEFF SESSIONS, USAG; JAMES GARNETT, JR., PRJ;
`DONALD HUNTER, PRJ; USMS UNKNOWN DEPUTY,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff - Appellant,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendants - Appellees.
`
`
`No. 20-6376
`
`
`WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
`
`
`
`
`
`HON. W. EARL BRITT; JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, USAG; JAMES W.
`GARNETT, JR., PRJ; DONALD HUNTER, PRJ; USMS UNKNOWN DEPUTY,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff - Appellant,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendants - Appellees.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
`Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:18-cv-00166-MSD-LRL)
`
`
`
`
`Submitted: June 26, 2020
`
`
`
`Decided: July 21, 2020
`
`
`
`
`Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
`
`
`Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
`
`
`William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
`
`
`Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`PER CURIAM:
`
`William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order transferring his 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 2255 (2018) motion to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North
`
`Carolina. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
`
`affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Britt, No. 2:18-cv-00166-MSD-
`
`LRL (E.D. Va. May 25, 2018). We deny Davis’ motions for a certificate of appealability
`
`as unnecessary, see Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009), and deny his motion to
`
`supplement. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
`
`adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
`
`decisional process.
`
`AFFIRMED
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`