`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
`
`
`No. 21-2160
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LARRY GOLDEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA; LG ELECTRONICS USA,
`INC.; QUALCOMM INC.; FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC; GENERAL
`MOTORS COMPANY; FCA US, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff - Appellant,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendants - Appellees.
`
`
`Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
`Greenville. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (6:20-cv-02270-JD)
`
`
`
`
`Submitted: March 29, 2022
`
`
`
`Decided: March 31, 2022
`
`
`
`Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
`
`
`Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
`
`
`Larry Golden, Appellant Pro Se.
`
`
`Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PER CURIAM:
`
`Larry Golden appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
`
`magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Golden’s civil complaint.∗ We have
`
`reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
`
`order. Golden v. Apple, Inc., No. 6:20-cv-02270-JD (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2021; Sept. 21,
`
`2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
`
`adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
`
`decisional process.
`
`
`
`AFFIRMED
`
`
`∗ We conclude that the district court’s order dismissing the complaint without
`prejudice is an appealable final order. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 611-12
`(4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021).
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`