throbber
UNPUBLISHED
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
`
`
`No. 24-2247
`
`
`In re: ROBERT CALVIN CRAIG, JR.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Western
`District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
`
`
`Submitted: February 20, 2025
`
`
`
`Decided: February 24, 2025
`
`
`Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
`
`
`Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
`
`
`Robert Calvin Craig, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
`
`
`Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PER CURIAM:
`
`
`Robert Craig, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the
`
`Federal Bureau of Investigation to investigate the North Carolina state court’s handling of
`
`his negligence action. We grant Craig’s motion to submit an affidavit and additional
`
`evidence but conclude that Craig is not entitled to mandamus relief.
`
`Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
`
`circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown,
`
`LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when
`
`the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to
`
`attain the relief [he] desires.” Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration and internal
`
`quotation marks omitted).
`
`This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials,
`
`Gurley v. Superior Ct. of Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969), nor does
`
`Craig have a private right to demand a criminal investigation, see Lefebure v. D’Aquilla,
`
`15 F.4th 650, 655 (5th Cir. 2021) (collecting cases); see also Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410
`
`U.S. 614, 619 (1973). The relief sought by Craig is not available by way of mandamus.
`
`Accordingly, we deny the petition and amended petition for writ of mandamus. We
`
`dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
`
`presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
`
`process.
`
`
`
`PETITION DENIED
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket