`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
`
`
`No. 24-6717
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LEO VINCENT POOLE,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff - Appellant,
`
`v.
`
`
`JACK J. JOINER, Warden Federal Correctional Institution Estill, South Carolina;
`HUGH J. HURWITZ, Director Federal Correctional Institution Estill, South
`Carolina; DIRECTOR J. GORDON, Supervisory Correctional Systems Specialist
`Federal Correction Institution Estill, South Carolina,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants - Appellees.
`
`
`Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
`Greenville. Kevin Frank McDonald, Magistrate Judge. (6:23-cv-06927-SAL)
`
`
`
`
`Submitted: October 29, 2024
`
`
`
`Decided: January 13, 2025
`
`
`
`Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
`Judge.
`
`
`Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
`
`
`Leo Vincent Poole, Appellant Pro Se.
`
`
`Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PER CURIAM:
`
`
`Leo Vincent Poole seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s recommendation that the
`
`district court dismiss Poole’s complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
`
`final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46
`
`(1949). The order Poole seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
`
`interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
`
`jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
`
`adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
`
`decisional process.
`
`DISMISSED
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
