`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`
`FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
`
`
`FILED
`
`
`JUN 30 2023
`
`MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
`U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Plaintiff-counter-
`
`defendant-Appellant,
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
` Defendant-counter-claimant-
` Appellee.
`
`
`
` Plaintiff-counter-
`
`defendant-Appellee,
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
` Defendant-counter-claimant-
` Appellant.
`
`No. 21-16506
`
`
`D.C. No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`Northern District of California,
`Oakland
`
`
`ORDER
`
`No. 21-16695
`
`
`D.C. No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`
`
`
`
`Before: S.R. THOMAS and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and McSHANE,* District
`Judge.
`
`
`The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petitions for panel rehearing.
`
`Judge M. Smith has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc, and Judges
`
`
`*
` The Honorable Michael J. McShane, United States District Judge for
`
`
`the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case: 21-16506, 06/30/2023, ID: 12747220, DktEntry: 246, Page 2 of 2
`
`S.R. Thomas and McShane so recommend. The full court has been advised of the
`
`petitions for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote. Fed.
`
`R. App. P. 35. The petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc (Dkt Nos.
`
`224 and 225) are DENIED.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`