throbber
Case 22-110, Document 1061, 08/07/2024, 3631267, Page1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE
`SECOND CIRCUIT
`____________________________________________
`
` At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at
`the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on
`the 7th day of August, two thousand twenty-four.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Docket No. 22-110
`
`____________________________________
`
`In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc, Purdue
`Transdermal Technologies L.P., Purdue Pharma
`Manufacturing L.P., Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P.,
`Imbrium Therapeutics L.P., Adlon Therapeutics L.P.,
`Greenfield BioVentures L.P., Seven Seas Hill Corp.,
`Ophir Green Corp., Purdue Pharma of Puerto Rico,
`Avrio Health L.P., Purdue Pharmaceutical Products L.P.,
`Purdue Neuroscience Company, Nayatt Cove Lifescience
`Inc., Button Land L.P., Rhodes Associates L.P., Paul
`Land Inc., Quidnick Land L.P., Rhodes Pharmaceuticals
`L.P., Rhodes Technologies, UDF LP, SVC Pharma LP,
`SVC Pharma Inc.,
`llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDebtors.
`*************************************
`
`Purdue Pharma, L. P., Purdue Pharma Inc, Purdue
`Transdermal Technologies L.P., Purdue Pharma
`Manufacturing L.P., Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P.,
`Imbrium Therapeutics L.P., Adlon Therapeutics L.P.,
`Greenfield BioVentures L.P., Seven Seas Hill Corp.,
`Ophir Green Corp., Purdue Pharma of Puerto Rico,
`Avrio Health L.P., Purdue Pharmaceutical Products L.P.,
`Purdue Neuroscience Company, Nayatt Cove Lifescience
`Inc., Button Land L.P., Rhodes Associates L.P., Paul
`Land Inc., Quidnick Land L.P., Rhodes Pharmaceuticals
`L.P., Rhodes Technologies, UDF LP, SVC Pharma LP,
`SVC Pharma Inc.,
`
`lllllllllllllllllllllDebtors-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,
`
`The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of
`Purdue Pharma L.P., et al., Ad Hoc Committee of
`Governmental and Other Contingent Litigation
`Claimants, The Raymond Sackler Family, Ad Hoc Group
`of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P., Multi-
`
`

`

`Case 22-110, Document 1061, 08/07/2024, 3631267, Page2 of 2
`
`State Governmental Entities Group, Mortimer-Side
`Initial Covered Sackler Persons,
`
`llllllllllllllllllllllAppellants-Cross-Appellees,
`
`v.
`
`The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff
`for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities,
`the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and
`Wetaskiwin., The Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation, on
`behalf of All Canadian First Nations and Metis People,
`the Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation on behalf itself, and the
`Lac La Ronge Indian Band,
`
`lllllllllllllllllllllAppellees-Cross Appellants,
`
`The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of
`Columbia, U.S. Trustee William K. Harrington, State of
`Connecticut, Ronald Bass, State of California, People of
`the State of California, by and through Attorney General
`Rob Bonta, State of Oregon, State of Delaware, by and
`through Attorney General Jennings, State of Rhode
`Island, State of Vermont, Ellen Isaacs, on behalf of
`Patrick Ryan Wroblewski, Maria Ecke, Andrew Ecke,
`Richard Ecke,
`
`lllllllllllllllllllllAppellees.
`_______________________________________
`
`
`
`By the Supreme Court’s Judgment dated July 29, 2024, this Court reinstated the above-
`
`referenced cases restoring jurisdiction to this Court.
`
` IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is reinstated.
`
`
`
`For The Court:
`Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe,
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket