throbber
Case: 22-3030 Document: 50 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/10/2023
`
`No. 22-3030
`
`In the United States Court of Appeals
`FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
`
`LOGIC TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
`PETITIONER,
`v.
`U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION,
`RESPONDENT.
`
`On Petition For Review Of An Order
`Of The U.S. Food And Drug Administration
`
`ADDENDUM TO THE OPENING BRIEF OF PETITIONER
`LOGIC TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MISHA TSEYTLIN
`Counsel of Record
`KEVIN M. LEROY
`SEAN T.H. DUTTON
`TROUTMAN PEPPER
`HAMILTON SANDERS LLP
`227 W. Monroe Street
`Suite 3900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`(608) 999-1240
`(312) 759-1939 (fax)
`misha.tseytlin@troutman.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`BRYAN M. HAYNES
`TROUTMAN PEPPER
`HAMILTON SANDERS LLP
`1001 Haxall Point
`15th Floor
`Richmond, VA 23219
`(804) 697-1420
`bryan.haynes@troutman.com
`
`
`
`KAITLIN L. O’DONNELL
`TROUTMAN PEPPER
`HAMILTON SANDERS LLP
`3000 Two Logan Square
`Eighteenth and Arch Streets
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`(215) 981-4356
`kaitlin.o’donnell@troutman.com
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 22-3030 Document: 50 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/10/2023
`
`
`
`LAR 28.1 STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES
`
`This case has not previously been before this Court. Petitioner
`
`currently has pending before this Court a separate petition for review
`
`arising out of a marketing denial order from the U.S. Food and Drug
`
`Administration in response to premarket tobacco applications for
`
`Petitioner’s non-menthol and non-tobacco-flavored electronic nicotine
`
`delivery systems. See Logic Tech. Dev. LLC v. FDA, No. 22-1750 (3d Cir.
`
`Apr. 22, 2022). That case is currently stayed and involves issues distinct
`
`from those implicated in this petition for review, as it does not deal with
`
`Petitioner’s menthol-flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems.
`
`Petitioner has pending before FDA a request for supervisory review of
`
`that separate marketing denial order. See Status Report, Logic Tech.
`
`Dev. LLC v. FDA, No. 22-1750 (3d Cir. Nov. 18, 2022).
`
`Petitioner further acknowledges that this Court previously
`
`considered a challenge to FDA’s denial of marketing authorization for
`
`non-menthol and non-tobacco-flavored electronic nicotine delivery
`
`systems in Liquid Labs LLC v. FDA, 52 F.4th 533 (3d Cir. 2022).
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 22-3030 Document: 50 Page: 3 Date Filed: 01/10/2023
`
`
`Petitioner is not aware of any other completed, pending, or contemplated
`
`case or proceeding before any court related to this case.
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`Case: 22-3030 Document: 50 Page: 4 Date Filed: 01/10/2023
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that, on January 10, 2023, a true and correct copy
`
`of this Addendum to the Opening Brief of Petitioner Logic Technology
`
`Development LLC was served on all counsel of record through the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 10, 2023
`
`/s/ Misha Tseytlin
`MISHA TSEYTLIN
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket