throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00002-EWH-DEM Document 66 Filed 09/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 2080
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`Norfolk Division
`
`
`CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC
`f/k/a CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:22-CV-00002
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Lift the Stay and Reopen Case
`
`(“Motion”). ECF No. 59. On March 20, 2023, the Court stayed this matter pending the outcome
`
`of an International Trade Commission (“ITC”) investigation involving three of the asserted
`
`patents. Mem. Order at 12, ECF No. 57. During the intervening time, the Patent Trial and Appeal
`
`Board (“PTAB”) instituted inter partes review of seven of the eleven asserted patents. Notice, ECF
`
`No. 65. Plaintiff requests the Court lift the stay as to four of the asserted patents once the ITC
`
`reaches its Final Determination, which is anticipated to be December 8, 2023. Pl.’s Mem. in Supp.
`
`at 2, 8, ECF No 60.
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion seeks prospective relief that is dependent on the conclusion of the ITC
`
`investigation and any subsequent appeals.1 As such, the Court finds it appropriate to take the
`
`Motion UNDER ADVISEMENT until the ITC proceedings are final.
`
`
`1
`The patents currently before the ITC are subject to a mandatory stay “until the
`determination of the Commission becomes final.” 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a). The Commission’s
`determination is not final until the proceedings are no longer subject to judicial review. In re
`Princo Corp., 478 F.3d 1345, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2007); see also 19 U.S.C. § 1337(c) (providing any
`person adversely affected by the ITC’s final determination sixty days to appeal the decision to the
`Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit).
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00002-EWH-DEM Document 66 Filed 09/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 2081
`
`
`
`Accordingly, the status conference scheduled to occur on September 14, 2023 at 2:00
`
`p.m. is hereby CANCELLED. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a joint notice as soon as
`
`practicable, but in any event no later than sixty days after the ITC issues its Final Determination.
`
`That joint notice must include:
`
`•
`
`the outcome of the ITC investigation;
`
`• whether either party has appealed or intends to appeal the ITC decision; and
`
`• a summary of the status of PTAB proceedings.
`
`It is SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Norfolk, Virginia
`Date: September 13, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/
`
`
`Elizabeth W. Hanes
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket