`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`Norfolk Division
`
`
`CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC
`f/k/a CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:22-CV-00002
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Lift the Stay and Reopen Case
`
`(“Motion”). ECF No. 59. On March 20, 2023, the Court stayed this matter pending the outcome
`
`of an International Trade Commission (“ITC”) investigation involving three of the asserted
`
`patents. Mem. Order at 12, ECF No. 57. During the intervening time, the Patent Trial and Appeal
`
`Board (“PTAB”) instituted inter partes review of seven of the eleven asserted patents. Notice, ECF
`
`No. 65. Plaintiff requests the Court lift the stay as to four of the asserted patents once the ITC
`
`reaches its Final Determination, which is anticipated to be December 8, 2023. Pl.’s Mem. in Supp.
`
`at 2, 8, ECF No 60.
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion seeks prospective relief that is dependent on the conclusion of the ITC
`
`investigation and any subsequent appeals.1 As such, the Court finds it appropriate to take the
`
`Motion UNDER ADVISEMENT until the ITC proceedings are final.
`
`
`1
`The patents currently before the ITC are subject to a mandatory stay “until the
`determination of the Commission becomes final.” 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a). The Commission’s
`determination is not final until the proceedings are no longer subject to judicial review. In re
`Princo Corp., 478 F.3d 1345, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2007); see also 19 U.S.C. § 1337(c) (providing any
`person adversely affected by the ITC’s final determination sixty days to appeal the decision to the
`Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit).
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00002-EWH-DEM Document 66 Filed 09/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 2081
`
`
`
`Accordingly, the status conference scheduled to occur on September 14, 2023 at 2:00
`
`p.m. is hereby CANCELLED. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a joint notice as soon as
`
`practicable, but in any event no later than sixty days after the ITC issues its Final Determination.
`
`That joint notice must include:
`
`•
`
`the outcome of the ITC investigation;
`
`• whether either party has appealed or intends to appeal the ITC decision; and
`
`• a summary of the status of PTAB proceedings.
`
`It is SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Norfolk, Virginia
`Date: September 13, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/
`
`
`Elizabeth W. Hanes
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`