throbber

`MARTIN J. WALSH,
`SECRETARY OF LABOR,
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`ELITE HOME HEALTH CARE, INC.
`d/b/a ELITE HOME HEALTH CARE;
`and HENRY L. OLDS, JR.,
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00310 Document 1 Filed 07/15/22 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`NORFOLK DIVISION
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Civil Action No.
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff, Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
`
`(“Plaintiff”), brings this action to enjoin Elite Home Health Care, Inc., d/b/a Elite Home Health
`
`Care (“Elite”) and Henry L. Olds, Jr., (collectively, “Defendants”), from violating the provisions
`
`of Sections 7, 11(c), 15(a)(2), and 15(a)(5) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended,
`
`29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. (“the Act”), and for a judgment against Defendants in the total amount
`
`of back wage compensation found by the Court to be due to any of the employees of Defendants
`
`pursuant to the Act and an equal amount due to the employees of Defendants in liquidated
`
`damages.
`
`1.
`
`Jurisdiction of this action is conferred upon the Court by Sections 16(c) and 17 of
`
`the Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 216(c) and 217, and by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1345.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Elite Home Health Care, Inc., d/b/a Elite Home Health Care (“Elite”)
`
`is, and at all times hereinafter referenced was, a Virginia corporation with a registered address
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00310 Document 1 Filed 07/15/22 Page 2 of 10 PageID# 2
`
`and principal place of business at 115 W. 2nd Avenue, Franklin, Virginia 23851, which is within
`
`the jurisdiction of this Court. Defendant Elite is a home healthcare business that provides in-
`
`home nursing care through direct care workers to its customers including providing
`
`companionship service and assistance with activities of daily living such as cooking, dressing,
`
`bathing, feeding and medicine reminders.
`
`3.
`
`Defendant Henry L. Olds, Jr. (“Olds”), is, and at all times hereinafter referenced
`
`was, the President and owner of Elite. Defendant Olds managed the daily operation of Elite,
`
`directed employment practices and has directly or indirectly acted in the interest of Elite in
`
`relation to its employees at all relevant times herein, including supervising employees, hiring and
`
`firing employees, and setting pay rates and policies for employees. Defendant Olds resides in
`
`Franklin, Virginia, within the jurisdiction of this Court. Defendant Olds meets the definition of
`
`an employer within the meaning of Section 3(d) of the Act. 29 U.S.C. § 203(d).
`
`4.
`
`Defendants employ persons in domestic service for profit, which affects
`
`commerce per Section 2(a)(5) of the Act. 29 U.S.C. 202(a)(5). Elite employs certified nursing
`
`assistants (“CNAs”) and personal care aides (“PCAs”) (collectively, “employees”) to provide in-
`
`home care services to Elite’s clients, at all times relevant herein.
`
`5.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendants have been an enterprise within the
`
`meaning of Section 3(r) of the Act, in that the Defendants have been, through a unified operation
`
`or common control, engaged in the performance of related activities for a common business
`
`purpose. 29 U.S.C. 203(r). These activities constituted (and/or were related to) the provision of
`
`health care services to customers, in furtherance of the Defendant’s business purposes. 29 U.S.C.
`
`§ 203(r).
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00310 Document 1 Filed 07/15/22 Page 3 of 10 PageID# 3
`
`6.
`
`At all times relevant herein, Defendants have employed, and are employing,
`
`employees in and about their place of business in the activities of an enterprise engaged in
`
`commerce. Further, at all times relevant herein, Defendants have had annual gross volume sales
`
`made or done in an amount not less than $500,000, thereby affording coverage to all of their
`
`employees pursuant to Section 3(s)(1)(A) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 203 (s)(1)(A)(ii).
`
`7.
`
`From at least April 20, 2018, through April 17, 2021 (“Relevant Period”)
`
`Defendants employed the individuals listed in the attached Schedule A (collectively referred to
`
`herein as “employees”) including nursing staff, CNAs, PCAs, and/or other domestic workers at
`
`some point during the Relevant Period.
`
`8.
`
`Defendants willfully violated the provisions of Sections 7 and 15(a)(2) of the Act,
`
`29 U.S.C. §§ 207 and 215(a)(2), by employing their employees in an enterprise engaged in
`
`commerce or in the production of goods for commerce for workweeks longer that those
`
`prescribed in Section 7 of the Act without compensating said employees for hours worked over
`
`forty (40) in a workweek at rates not less than one and one-half times their regular rates.
`
`Therefore, Defendants are liable for the payment of unpaid overtime compensation and an equal
`
`amount of liquidated damages under Section 16(c) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(c).
`
`a.
`
`For example, during the Relevant Period, from at least April 27, 2018, through
`
`April 17, 2021, Defendants failed to compensate certain of non-exempt employees employed
`
`as CNAs and PCAs who worked over forty (40) hours in a workweek at one and one-half
`
`times their regular rate. During the Relevant Period, these employees worked at least one
`
`hour in excess of forty (40) hours per workweek.
`
`9.
`
`Defendants knew or recklessly disregarded their obligations under section 7 of the
`
`Act, in that Defendants were required to compensate employees who worked more than forty
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00310 Document 1 Filed 07/15/22 Page 4 of 10 PageID# 4
`
`(40) hours in a workweek at the overtime rate. For example, Defendants paid certain employees
`
`straight time for all or some hours worked over (40) forty in a workweek. Additionally, in
`
`workweeks in which certain other employees worked in excess of forty (40) per workweek,
`
`Defendants paid employees a combination of straight time hourly rates and the required time and
`
`one-half premium rate and did not pay the required time and one-half premium rate for all
`
`overtime hours worked.
`
`10.
`
`Defendants willfully violated the provisions of Sections 11(c) and 15(a)(5) of the
`
`Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 211(c) and 215(a)(5), by failing to make, keep and preserve adequate and
`
`accurate records of their employees’ wages, hours and other conditions of employment, as
`
`required by the regulations issued and found at 29 C.F.R. Part 516. Further, Defendants failed to
`
`keep proper records of their employees’ regular rate of pay and the total premium pay for all
`
`overtime hours worked in a workweek and compensation as prescribed by 29 C.F.R. Part
`
`516.2(a)(6) and (9). For example, Defendants’ failed to keep accurately regular rates in overtime
`
`workweeks and fail to separate hours worked into single workweeks.
`
`11.
`
`As a result of the willful violations alleged above, amounts are owed for hours
`
`worked that were paid at rates less than the rates set forth in Sections 7 of the Act for the
`
`employees named in Schedule A attached to this Complaint. Additional amounts may be due to
`
`other employees employed by Defendants during the time period covered by this Complaint (and
`
`continuing up to the time Defendants demonstrate that they came into compliance with the Act)
`
`whose identities are not now known to Plaintiff.
`
`12.
`
`During the relevant period, Defendants continually and willfully violated the
`
`provisions of the Act as alleged above. A judgment permanently enjoining and restraining the
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00310 Document 1 Filed 07/15/22 Page 5 of 10 PageID# 5
`
`violations herein alleged (including restraining of withholding of overtime compensation) is
`
`specifically authorized by Section 17 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 217.
`
`WHEREFORE, cause having been shown, the Secretary prays for judgment against
`
`Defendants providing the following relief:
`
`(1)
`
`For an injunction issued pursuant to Section 17 of the Act permanently enjoining
`
`and restraining Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and those persons in
`
`active concert or participation with Defendants who receive actual notice of any such judgment,
`
`from violating the provisions of Sections 7, 11(c), 15(a)(2) and 15(a)(5) of the Act; and,
`
`(2)
`
`For judgment pursuant to Section 16(c) of the Act finding Defendants liable for
`
`unpaid overtime compensation due to certain of Defendants’ current and former employees listed
`
`in the attached Schedule A for the period from at least April 20, 2018, through April 17, 2021,
`
`and for an equal amount due to certain of Defendants’ current and former employees in
`
`liquidated damages. Additional amounts of back wages and liquidated damages may also be
`
`owed to certain current and former employees of Defendants listed in the attached Schedule A
`
`for violations continuing after April 17, 2021, and may be owed to certain current and former
`
`employees presently unknown to the Secretary for the period covered by this Complaint, who
`
`may be identified during this litigation and added to Schedule A;
`
`(3)
`
`For an injunction issued pursuant to Section 17 of the Act restraining Defendants,
`
`their officers, agents, employees, and those persons in active concert or participation with
`
`defendants, from withholding the amount of unpaid overtime compensation found due
`
`defendants’ employees;
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00310 Document 1 Filed 07/15/22 Page 6 of 10 PageID# 6
`
`(4)
`
`In the event liquidated damages are not awarded, for an Order awarding
`
`prejudgment interest computed at the underpayment rate established by the Secretary of the
`
`Treasury pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6621.
`
`FURTHER, Plaintiff prays that this Honorable Court award costs in his favor, and an
`
`order granting such other and further relief as may be necessary and appropriate.
`
`Mailing Address:
`
` UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Mohamed E Seifeldein
`U.S. Department of Labor
`Office of the Regional Solicitor
`201 12th Street South
`Suite 401
`Arlington, VA 22202-5450
`(202) 693-9393(voice)
`(202) 693-9392 (fax)
`seifeldein.mohamed.e@dol.gov
`
`Sharon H. McKenna
`U.S. Department of Labor
`Office of the Regional Solicitor
`1835 Market Street
`Mailstop SOL/22
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`(215) 861-5037 (voice)
`(215) 861-5162 (fax)
`mckenna.sharon.h@dol.gov
`
`Seema Nanda
`Solicitor of Labor
`
`Oscar L. Hampton III
`Regional Solicitor
`
`Ryma N. Lewis
`Wage and Hour Counsel
`VA State Bar # 83322
`
`/s/ Mohamed Seifeldein
`Mohamed E Seifeldein
`Trial Attorney
`VA State Bar # 84424
`
`/s/ Sharon H. McKenna
`Sharon H. McKenna
`Trial Attorney
`PA Bar ID # 89181 Pro
`hac vice pending
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Date: July 15, 2022
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00310 Document 1 Filed 07/15/22 Page 7 of 10 PageID# 7
`
`SCHEDULE A
`
`
`
`Name
`1. April Artis
`2. Michelle D. Artis
`3. Dianne Asuquo
`Shelia Banks
`4.
`5. Catina Bansah
`Paulette D. Barham
`6.
`7. Ruth Barham
`8. Derrick Best
`9. Annette Blount
`Lynette Blow
`10.
`11. Cristina Boone
`12. Destiny S. Boone
`Latoria Boone
`13.
`14. Marquita Boone
`Patricia B. Boone
`15.
`16.
`Tonya Boone
`17. Helen N. Boone-Beale
`Torrance Bowers
`18.
`19. Candace L. Bradshaw
`Jymese Bradshaw
`20.
`21.
`Loretta Bradshaw
`22. Brenda Branch
`23. Rita Britt
`24. Karen F. Clemons
`25. Alfred Cole
`Ericka Cornick
`26.
`27. Angelia M. Cross
`Patricia Davis
`28.
`29.
`Stephen A. Davis
`30.
`Emma Diggs
`31. Debra E. Dillard
`Therman L. Dillard
`32.
`33.
`Loretta Douglas
`34.
`Tasha Douglas
`35. Karen T. Earls
`Eura A. Eley
`36.
`37.
`LeeAnn Eley
`38. Kimberly Elliot
`39. Virginia Epps Street
`40. Garrett Eure
`41. Marian F. Evans
`Lucy Everette
`42.
`43.
`Tarria L. Everrett
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00310 Document 1 Filed 07/15/22 Page 8 of 10 PageID# 8
`
`Shamara Falkins
`44.
`Elexus S. Fenner
`45.
`Felicia Fenner
`46.
`47. Bridget R. Flythe
`Towanna Flythe
`48.
`49.
`Tabatha F. Garris
`50. Doris Gay
`51. Anette Giles
`Shirley Godette
`52.
`53.
`Evelyn Goodman
`54.
`Sherry Goodman
`55.
`Jereline Goodwin
`56.
`Latrice Graham
`57.
`Phillys Grant
`58.
`Trivonia Greene
`59. Donisha Harris
`Shirl V. Harris
`60.
`61.
`Patricia Harrison
`62. Wayne Hart
`Teresa Hatch
`63.
`64. Rosalinda Hendricks
`Shelly Holden
`65.
`66.
`Linda Hunter
`67.
`Tonya Hunter
`68. Antwan Joe
`69. Nicole Johnson
`70. Kassidi L. Johnson
`71. Calvetta L. Jones
`72. Debra R. Jones
`Tiffany Jones
`73.
`74. Dorothy Jordan
`75. Chiquita M. Joyner
`Josephine Joyner
`76.
`77.
`Lasonya D. Joyner
`78. Monica P. Keeling
`79. Marquette M. Keeling
`80. Geraldine Key
`81. Brittany Knight
`82. Dionja U. Lane
`Jaceria Lankford
`83.
`84.
`Jada Lankford
`85. Audrey H. Lee
`86. Alexis Lewis
`Shirley Long
`87.
`88. Viola Lovell
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00310 Document 1 Filed 07/15/22 Page 9 of 10 PageID# 9
`
`James Mallory
`89.
`Shondarra McClenny
`90.
`Loreal McDonald
`91.
`Eva McLaughlin
`92.
`Erica S. Murphy
`93.
`94. Dasha L. Newsome
`95. Monoca Newsome
`96. Helena Person
`Loretta Peterson
`97.
`98. Carzette Phelps
`99. Alexis Phipps
` Bridgitte D. Picot
`100.
`101.
` Hyesha Pope
`102.
` Joyce K. Ralph
`
`103.
` LaToya M. Rawlings
`104.
` Denashia Ridley
`105.
` Nicole Santiful
`106.
` Muriel F. Seaborn
`107.
` Shaniya Slade
`108.
` Darlene Smith
`109.
` Delores W. Smith
`110.
` Loretta Smith
`111.
` Michealla Smith
`112.
` Quiaira Smith
`113.
` Stanley Smith
`114.
` Tracy Smith
`115.
` Tammy P. Stephens
`116.
` Addie J. Sykes
`117.
` Doris Sykes
`118.
` LaShandice Sykes
`119.
` Sabrina L. Tanner
`120.
` LaRosa Thomas
`121.
` Nikesha Thomas
`122.
` Gladys Thompson
`123.
` Sherita Thorpe
`124.
` Angie Turner
`125.
` Kathie L. Tyler
`126.
` Kimberli Vaughan
`127.
` Joam D. Vinson
`
`128.
` Cynthia Warren
`129.
` Tiffany Warren
`130.
` Laquonda Washington
`131.
` Adrian Watson
`132.
` Beatrice Whitehead
`133.
` Demetrice Wiggins
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00310 Document 1 Filed 07/15/22 Page 10 of 10 PageID# 10
`
`134.
`135.
`136.
`137.
`138.
`
` Jocelyn Wiggins
`
` Chaka Williams
` Gwendolyn Woodley
` Judy Woodley
`
` Maricole A. Wright
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket