`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`
`Richmond Division
`
`
`
`
`
`SOUNDCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 3:24-cv-00540
`
`GOOGLELLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Google LLC's (''Google") Consent
`
`
`
`
`
`to Complaint and LLC to File Responsive Pleadings Motion for Extension of Time for Google
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Memorandum in Support (the "Motion"). (ECF No. 12.) In the Motion, Google requests that the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Court extend its deadline to respond to Plaintiff SoundClear Technologies LLC's Complaint,
`
`
`
`(ECF No. 1), from August 21, 2024 to September 30, 2024. (ECF No. 12, at 1.) Google
`
`
`
`
`
`represents that "Sound Clear has agreed to allow Google an extension of time through and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`including September 30, 2024[.]" (ECF No. 12, at 1.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Upon due consideration, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b ), 1 and for good cause
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`shown, the Court GRANTS the Motion. (ECF No. 12.) Google SHALL file its response
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) states, in relevant part:
`
`
`(1)In General.
`
`
`court may, for good cause, extend the time:
`
`
`
`When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the
`
`(A)with or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`made, before the original time or its extension expires[.]
`
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(l).
`
`
`
`Case 3:24-cv-00540-MHL Document 15 Filed 08/27/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 135
`
`to Plaintiffs Complaint by September 30, 2024.
`
`It is SO ORDERED.
`
`Date:
`Richmond, Virginia
`
`/S;
`M. Hannah LaulM ^ J 1/
`United States Dtstnct Judge
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
