`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
` Case No. 2:18-cv-01732-RSM
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND MOTION,
`AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE
`DEADLINES FOR OPENING AND
`RESPONSIVE CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION BRIEFS
`
`
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`
`
`v.
`
`HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND MOTION
`This Joint Stipulation and Motion is entered into by and between Plaintiff Uniloc 2017
`LLC and Defendant HTC America, Inc., by their respective counsels.
`In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Markman hearing being continued from
`April 24, 2020, until at least mid-June 2020, the parties respectfully request that the deadlines for
`
`opening and responsive claim construction briefs each be moved back by one week, to March 27,
`2020, and April 10, 2020, respectively.
`These extensions will not otherwise affect the schedule in this matter. However, the
`parties note that, in light of the aforementioned issues, and as recognized by the Court’s General
`Order No. 02-20, the remainder of the schedule will in all likelihood need to be amended. For
`example, review of the source code in this case will require Uniloc’s expert to travel to HTC’s
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`2:18-CV-01732-RSM
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cv-01732-RSM Document 45 Filed 03/20/20 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`counsel’s office. And, depositions of the parties will require travel to, inter alia, Seattle, Los
`Angeles, Hawaii and Taiwan, travel which would be impossible given current conditions. The
`parties will continue to meet and confer to discuss options, and also seek guidance from the
`Court.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the parties respectfully request that these deadlines be
`modified as stipulated above.
`
`Dated: March 18, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`VAN KAMPEN & CROWE PLLC
`
`
`By: /s/Al Van Kampen
`Al Van Kampen, WSBA No. 13670
`1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 4050
`Seattle, WA 98154
`Telephone: (206) 386-7353
`Fax: (206) 405-2825
`AVanKampen@VKClaw.com
`
`PRINCE LOBEL TYE LLP
`
`
`By: /s/ Aaron S. Jacobs
`Aaron S. Jacobs (pro hac vice)
`James J. Foster (pro hac vice)
`One International Place, Suite 3700
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: (617) 456-8000
`Ajacobs@princelobel.com
`Jfoster@princelobel.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Uniloc 2017 LLC
`
`
`
`WILLIAMS SIMONS & LANDIS PLLC
`
`/s/ Fred I. Williams
`Fred I. Williams (pro hac vice)
`fwilliams@wsltrial.com
`Todd E. Landis (pro hac vice)
`tlandis@wsltrial.com
`327 Congress Ave., Suite 490
`Austin, TX 78701
`512-543-1354
`
`YARMUTH LLP
`
`By: /s/Molly A. Terwilliger
`Molly A. Terwilliger, WSBA No. 28449
`mterwilliger@yarmuth.com
`YARMUTH LLP
`1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1400
`Seattle, WA 98101
`206.516.3800 telephone
`mterwilliger@yarmuth.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`2:18-CV-01732-RSM
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cv-01732-RSM Document 45 Filed 03/20/20 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant HTC America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`2:18-CV-01732-RSM
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cv-01732-RSM Document 45 Filed 03/20/20 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline to
`file opening claim construction briefs is set to March 27, 2020, and the deadline to file responsive
`claim construction briefs is set to April 10, 2020.
`DATED this 20th day of March 2020.
`
`A
`
`RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
`CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
`2:18-CV-01732-RSM
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
