throbber
Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 1 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr900151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 1 of 38
`
`
`
`Presented to the Court by the foreman of the
`Grand Jury in open Court,
`in the presence
`of the Grand Jury and FILED in the US.
`DISTRICT COURT at Seattle, Washington
`September 16, 2020
`
`,
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
`
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`
`AT SEATTLE
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`NO.
`
`CR20'151 RA]
`
`Plamtlff’
`
`INDICTMENT
`
`v.
`
`EPHRAIM ROSENBERG,
`
`JOSEPH NILSEN,
`
`HADIS NUHANOVIC,
`
`KRISTEN LECCESE,
`ROHIT KADIMISETTY, and
`NISHAD KUNJU,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`The Grand Jury charges that:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1,
`
`Amazon.com, Inc. is a Seattle-based company that operates the Amazon
`
`Marketplace, one of world’s largest online marketplaces. The Amazon Marketplace is an
`
`electronic commerce (or “e-commerce”) digital platform, on Which consumers can
`
`purchase goods, multimedia, and services, from online merchants. The merchants who
`
`make sales on the Amazon Marketplace include Amazon itself and “third—party” or “3P”
`
`sellers, the latter of Which are non-Amazon individuals and entities.
`
`Indictment
`
`United States v. Rosenberg, et a]. — 1
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553-7970
`
`
`
`
`
`\OOOflam-PUJNH
`
`NMNNNNNNNP—‘D—‘P—‘P—‘l—‘D—‘J—‘t—lr—‘b—A
`
`ooflmm-th-b—‘OKOOOQONm-RWNt—‘O
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 2 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 2 of 38
`
`\oooqoxmqsmww
`
`NNNNNNNNNHi—HHHHHHHH-OOQONMLUJNHOKDOOQONU‘I-DUJNHO
`
`2.
`
`Since at least 2017, the Defendants, and others known and unknown to the
`
`Grand Jury, have conspired to pay, and have paid, over $100,000 in commercial bribes to ‘
`
`complicit Amazon employees and contractors (collectively referred to herein as “Amazon
`
`insiders”). In exchange for bribes, and the promise of such bribes, the Amazon insiders
`
`baselessly and fraudulently conferred tens of millions of dollars of competitive benefits
`
`upon hundreds of 3P seller accounts that the Defendants purported to represent in their
`capacity as prominent “consultants” to 3P sellers. Through this scheme, the Defendants
`
`intended to cause harm to Amazon, and to 3P sellers and consumers on the Amazon
`
`Marketplace, including by depriving Amazon of the exclusive use and confidentiality of
`
`its internal business information, interfering with Amazon’s ability to ensure the safety
`
`and authenticity of goods sold on the Amazon Marketplace, and impairing consumers’
`
`access to accurate, reliable information about merchants and’products on the Amazon
`
`Marketplace.
`3.
`
`The Defendants are members of an interdependent community of 3P
`
`sellers, consultants to 3P sellers, and Amazon insiders who have accessed and coopted,
`
`without authorization and for private financial gain, the computer systems, processes, and
`
`information that regulate day-to—day operations of the Amazon Marketplace. Through
`
`the use of bribes, and the promise of bribes, the Defendants, and Amazon insiders,
`
`engaged in the following conduct, among other conduct:
`
`‘
`
`a.
`
`Stealing Amazon confidential business information: Defendants,
`
`and other 3P sellers and consultants, bribed Amazon insiders to send them terabytes of
`confidential information that the insiders misappropriated from Amazon” 3 protected
`
`networks, including a trove of internal standard operating procedures (SOPs) and Wikis. V
`
`The stolen files included, among other things, the formulae for the algorithms that power
`
`the Amazon Marketplace search engine, Amazon’s product—review rankings, and the
`
`coveted “buy boxes” that list default sellers on particular product listings; the criteria that
`
`Amazon considers when determining whether to suspend or reinstate accounts or product
`
`listings; Amazon’s internal notes (or “annotations”) about hundreds of 3P accounts; and
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenberg, el‘ al; — 2
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET’ SUITE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553—7970
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 3 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 3 of 38
`
`thousands of consumers’ and employees’ identities and contact information. The
`
`Defendants, and other 3P sellers and consultants, derived substantial commercial benefits
`
`from the misappropriated information, including by sharing and selling it within their
`
`professional networks.
`
`b.
`
`Reinstating suspended 3P accounts and products: Defendants,
`
`and other 3P sellers and consultants, bribed Amazon insiders to reinstate merchant
`
`accounts and product listings that Amazon had suspended in response to customer—safety
`concerns, counterfeiting complaints from intellectual-property holders, the merchants’
`manipulation of product reviews, and other violations of Amazon’s policies and codes of
`conduct. Since their baseless and fraudulent. reinstatement, the previously suspended ,
`
`merchant and product listings have generated over $100 million dollars in total revenue
`
`from sales on the Amazon Marketplace.
`
`0.
`
`Circumventing Amazon restrictions on 3P accounts: Defendants,
`
`and other 3P sellers and consultants, bribed Amazon insiders to circumvent and/or waive
`
`Amazon—imposed limitations and fees relating to the amount of inventory, including
`
`hazmat inventory, oversized inventory, and long—term inventory, that 3P sellers may store
`
`at Amazon’s warehouses and fulfillment centers. The Amazon insiders also helped 3P
`
`sellers and consultants defraud Amazon into approving the 3P sellers’ requests to sell
`
`restricted products, such as dietary supplements, also referred to as “ungating,” on the
`
`basis of fraudulent and forged supplier invoices.
`
`d.
`
`Facilitating attacksagainst 3P'sellers and product listings:
`
`Defendants, and other 3P sellers and consultants, bribed Amazon insiders to attack other
`3P sellers and those sellers’ prOduct listings, in order to gain an unfair competitive
`
`advantage over those victims and to settle other scores. To facilitate these attacks,
`
`Amazon insiders shared competitive intelligence about the victim sellers’ businesses,
`
`products, and advertising strategies, with 3P sellers and their consultants; used their
`
`inside access to Amazon’s network to suspend the Victim sellers’ accounts and product
`
`\OOOQQUI-PUJNl—I
`
`NNNNNNNNNHHl—‘l—‘Ht—AHHl—IHmflONM-hWNt—‘OKDOO,\]O\UIJ>~UJN>—‘O
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenberg, et a]. — 3
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET” sums 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553-7970
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 4 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 4 of 38
`
`listings; and helped consultants flood the Victims’ product listings with content and
`
`fraudulent customer reviews designed to hurt sales.
`
`These attacks included self—styled “takedowns” against victim 3P
`
`sellers, through Which the Defendants, and other 3P sellers and consultants, adulterated
`
`Victims’ product listings vVith replacement, and in some cases lewd and offensive, content
`
`and images, designed to drive away consumers and intimidate the victims. Examples of
`such adulterated product listings are set f01th below:
`'
`
`_Flccu: Hmtcd Throw (flanker with Cunlrullcn "JVth,_
`ti.’
`‘
`'1"
`I
`n
`A
`
`m1 549,99 www-
`buInaunnurw’hut'
`
`1‘
`
`Us
`
`”21.. >
`In 5:0" syn-r”unlax1:...‘.-u:~~'n m\\
`h.»111' Mum mum“: ::
`1:
`0111.. Linux-.7...
`mum, mhuunmmg
`
`,
`
`.
`
`‘;ll“.alur
`a,_
`
`*>l<*
`
`-'thmm 9mm Illrnd re: 1309st (4h will: 5 Bulbun cm Per Serving .ou 12
`Strains a! Beard: lot Digrstiw Health.
`
`***
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenberg, et a]. — 4
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`70° STEWART STREET’ SUITE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553-7970
`
`OO\]O\U1-I>UJL\J)—*
`
`1o
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 5 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 5 of 38
`
`\DOOQONU‘I-b-UJNr—A
`
`
`
`NNNNNNNNNl—‘l—‘l—Al—‘D—‘r—ll—ll—‘k—‘l—‘locQQm-b-UJNt—‘OKOOOQQUI-PWNHO
`
`amazon
`~29" vne
`#1..
`'zll"
`
`l:
`
`t
`
`:
`
`,-
`
`-'
`
`l! -llw-v ‘.
`
`.
`
`@ Deliver to Joe — New Voyk 10015
`
`:xILon: GLDIAI,
`’i;
`_.
`= - FLAVORS
`
`'
`fitttt I33
`—
`_:em Diet Pills That \Vorl. - Vlelght L05: Suppzsmenu
`to Burn Fat r35! ~ flnnst (run-w and Mt Inbolism - n05! Pit-luv".
`Supplement le- Wuunvn .mrl Mun ‘ Hamru Duwu [$0 Caps-4h”.
`I‘h
`
`#pt‘ffl!
`
`FREE Delivery Tomorrow
`If you OldL‘l wuhln 1 3 hrs ‘1 nuns. Dela-ls
`In Stock.
`Sold by—and Fulfilled by Amazon.
`Gift-wrap available.
`
`The intended and actual impact of such adulteration attacks was to effectively
`
`incapacitate the 3P accounts.
`
`A.
`
`THE AMAZON MARKETPLACE
`
`4.
`
`The Amazon Marketplace consists of geographically defined online
`
`marketplaces, including a United States-based marketplace and a United Kingdom—based
`
`marketplace. Online consumers can browse millions of product listings on the Amazon
`
`Marketplace, place items in Virtual shopping carts, complete purchases using credit cards
`
`and/or other forms of digital payment, arrange for products to be delivered to addresses
`
`that they designate, and return products to Amazon in exchange for a refund. Amazon
`
`provides consumers with a centralized search engine, categorized hyperlinks, online
`
`directories, and other digital tools, in order to navigate the Amazon Marketplace. Using a
`
`standardized format and organization, every product listing sets forth the relevant
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenbezg, et al. - 5
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553-7970
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 6 of 38
`[Case 2:20-crL00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 6 of 38
`
`product’s attributes, appearance, price, customer reviews, and an Amazon Standard
`
`Identification Number (“ASIN”), an alphanumeric identifier assigned to each product.
`
`5.
`
`Merchants on the Amazon Marketplace consist of Amazon, as well as 3P
`
`sellers. 3P sellers pay Amazon fees in connection with making sales on the Amazon
`
`Marketplace. To facilitate 3P sellers’ operations, Amazon offers 3P sellers a range of
`
`additional fee—based services, including the “Fulfillment by Amazon” (or ‘_‘FBA”) service,
`
`through which Amazon stores inventory for 3P sellers, arranges for that inventory to be
`
`shipped to purchasers, and handles customer-service inquiries and returns. Amazon also
`
`assigns employees at its offices around the world to one or more “Seller Support” teams,
`
`1 2 3 4 5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10 which assist 3P sellers.
`
`11
`
`6.
`
`When registering an account with Amazon, 3P sellers provide Amazon
`
`12 with identifying information, which may include an email address, a form of
`
`13
`identification that can be used to verify identity, a credit card, and a financial account to
`14 which Amazon can transmit sales proceeds. Products sold by 3P sellers may consist of
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`(a) products that they acquire elsewhere and resell, in potential competition with other 3P
`
`sellers who engage in the sale ofthe same products; and (b) products that they sell under
`
`a registered “brand,” in connection with a variety of brand—protection programs and
`
`18'
`
`services that Amazon may offer.
`
`19
`
`7.
`
`Amazon restricts the sale of certain categories of products, by requiring 3P
`
`20 sellers to obtain Amazon’s approval before selling these items. Examples of restricted
`21 products include copyrighted multimedia, dietary‘supplements, over—the—counter
`22 medicines, and medical products. 3P sellers that seek to sell products in restricted i
`23 product categories typically provide Amazon with invoices showing that they purchased
`24 these items from a bona fide supplier, in order to establish that the products they intend to
`25
`sell are authentic, and that they are not engaging in retail arbitrage.
`26
`8.
`Amazon requires 3P sellers to agree to selling policies and codes of conduct
`
`27 as a condition to make sales on the Amazon Marketplace. Amazon’s selling policies and
`
`28
`
`codes of conduct prohibit 3P sellers from providing inaccurate information to consumers,
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenberg, et a]. — 6
`
`'
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET, SUTI'E 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553-7970
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cr-00151—RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 ’ Page 7 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 7 of 38
`
`\OOO\]O\U14>~UJI\)I—t
`
`
`
`NNNNNNNNNP-‘l—‘F—‘l—lb-‘l—IP-‘h-‘l—‘F—eooqoxmgmNI—toxoooqoxmhwwwo
`
`manipulating product reviews, otherwise contacting consumers independently of
`
`Amazon, and attacking other 3P sellers and those sellers’ product listings. In practice, a
`
`wide range of 3P seller conduct may violatethese policies and codes of conduct,
`
`including: (a) the sale of unsafe products; (b) the sale of used or refurbished products that
`
`are marketed as “new”; (0) the sale of counterfeit products; ((1) 3P sellers’ infringement of
`intellectual-property rights in product listings, product packaging, and products; and (e)
`3P sellers’ manipulation of product reviews, including by posing falsely as product
`purchasers, and Offering gifts to consumers in exchange for their agreement favorably to
`
`I
`
`post or revise product reviews.
`
`9.
`Amazon also maintains, including on computers and servers located in the
`Western District of Washington, a wide array of information about 3P sellers and their
`
`products, including price and sales history, product-review history, the rate at which
`
`customers return 3P sellers’ products and the reasons that consumers provide for such
`returns, 3P sellers’ timeliness in delivering products to customers and refreshing their
`
`inventory of products that Amazon stores at its warehouses, and identifying information
`regarding customers. 3P sellers have access to some information about their own 3P 1
`l
`
`accounts and products, including product—specific data regarding their revenues over
`time. Amazon does not, however, provide 3P sellers with access to non-public merchant-
`
`specific and/or product-Specific information about other 3P sellers; nor does it provide 3P
`
`, sellers with the contact information for customers who review their products.-
`
`10.
`
`Amazon uses algorithms to control the operation of various aspects of the
`
`Amazon Marketplace, including, in particular, the Amazon Marketplace’s central search
`engine, the prominence of merchants and product reviews in product listings, limits on 3P
`
`sellers’ ability to store different types of inventory in Amazon’s warehouses, and the
`
`potential suspension of 3P accounts or their product listings. For instance, Amazon’s
`
`central search engine may rank product listings in response to customer queries, in part
`
`by reference to “keywords” that 3P sellers use to designate their product listings. The
`
`“buy box” on a product listing may provide consumers with a default seller who has a
`
`Indictment
`United States V. Rosenberg, et a]. - 7
`
`'
`
`.
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553—7970
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 8 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 8 of 38
`
`
`
`\oooq‘oxu‘msswwh.
`
`
`
`NNNNNNNNP—‘l—‘b—‘b—‘D—‘P—‘F—ll—‘Hl—l\IONUI-b-UJNHOKOOOQONU‘I-bwmt—‘O
`
`In addition, the
`long history of positive customer reviews and timely product deliveries.
`most prominent product review shown on a product listing may be one that is recent,
`
`lengthy, and voted “helpful” by other consumers. Amazon takes reasonable measures to
`maintain the confidentiality of information about the algorithms and other systems that
`control the Amazon Marketplace, including by restricting access to this information and
`
`by marking it confidential, and such information derives independent economic value
`
`from its secrecy.
`
`l 1.
`
`Amazon uses “suspensions” to regulate 3P sellers and products on the
`
`Amazon Marketplace. Various teams within Amazon, and the employees and contractors
`
`that compose those teams, have the authority to suspend 3P sellers and products for
`
`reasons that can include product safety, intellectual—property violations, the sale of
`restrictedproducts without first obtaining Amazon’s preapproval throughthe use of a
`
`legitimate supplier invoice, improper contact with consumers, and review manipulation.
`
`Suspensions may be temporary, e. g., in order to provide Amazon time to inspect a
`
`product that consumers have identified as unsafe. Suspensions may also be conditional
`
`upon the relevant 3P seller supplying a “plan of action” to Amazon that adequately
`
`explains the cause of the Conduct that gave rise to the suspension and satisfactory
`
`remedial measures. In certain cases, suspensions may be permanent. Amazon provides
`3P sellers the option to appeal from (or “escalate”) adverse suspension decisions.
`
`12.
`
`Amazon’s computer network includes tools that enables authorized
`
`employees and contractors to suspend 3P sellers and products, receive and review “plans
`
`of action” from suspended 3P sellers, and to revive (or “reinstate”) suspended 3P sellers
`and product listings. Amazon reduires employees and contractors with access privileges
`
`to these tools only to use those privileges in furtherance of their job responsibilities, and
`prohibits them from using those access privileges in furtherance of any private,
`
`pecuniary, objective. Amazon further requires employees and centractors not to provide
`outsiders with access to the tools that they use in connection‘with the regulation of 3P
`
`28
`
`sellers and products on the Amazon Marketplace. AmazOn also provides SOPs, Wikis,
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenberg, et a]. — 8
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ‘
`700 STEWART STREET) sum: 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553—7970
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 9 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 9 of 38
`
`
`
`and other written guidance, to its employees and contractors in connection with their
`
`regulation of the Amazon Marketplace. Amazon takes reasonable measures to maintain
`
`the confidentiality of these SOPS, Wikis, and other written guidance, including by
`restricting access to this information and by marking it confidential, and Such information
`
`derives independent economic value from its secrecy.
`
`13.
`
`Amazon keeps a record of each 3P seller’s suspension and reinstatement
`
`activity (and other related information about the merchant’s account and product listings)
`
`in a running log of annotations, referred to herein as an “annotation history.” Annotation
`histories may reflect confidentialcomplaints from other 3P sellers and/or customers,
`details of Amazon’s internal investigation regarding the relevant 3P account, a record of
`
`account or product suspensions, and a record of account or product reinstatements.
`
`Amazon does not make annotation histories available to 3P sellers, and otherwise
`restrictsaccess to those annotation histories to the employees and contractors whose roles
`
`and responsibilities include the regulation of the Amazon Marketplace.
`1
`.14.
`The Amazon employees, contractors, and computers that play a role in the
`processes described in this section are located in the Western District of washington and
`elsewhere.
`
`B.
`
`THE DEFENDANTS
`
`15.
`
`EPHRAIM ROSENBERG (“ROSENBERG”), also known as (“aka”) “Ed
`
`Rosenberg,” is a resident of Brooklyn, New York, and the owner of Effyzaz, Inc.
`(“Effyzaz”), a New York company. ROSENBERG purports to provide fee—based
`consulting expertise to 3P sellers, including thrOugh a service named “Amazon Sellers
`
`Group TG” (“ASGTG”). In addition to providing individualized consulting to 3P sellers,
`
`ROSENBERG hosts an annual 3P seller conference in Brooklyn, provides informational
`
`digital videos about 3P sales through an account on the video—sharing website
`www.youtube.com, and hosts interactive 3P consulting webinars.
`
`KOOO\IO\UTJ>UJI\))—t
`
`NNNNNNNNHHHt—‘l—‘b—‘D—KHD—Kr—d
`\IQMgWNHOKDOOQONm-DWNHO
`
`16.
`
`JOSEPH NILSEN (“NILSEN”) is a resident of New York, New York, and
`
`28
`
`is the founder and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Digital Checkmate, Inc. (“Digital
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenbeig, et a]. — 9
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET’ SUITE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98 101
`(206) 553—7970
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 10 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151—RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 10 of 38
`
`Checkmate”), a New York company. NILSEN purports to provide fee—based consulting
`
`expertise to 3P sellers, including by advising 3P sellers regarding their online product
`
`offerings on the Amazon Marketplace, providing competitive intelligence to 3P sellers,
`
`devising marketing campaigns for 3P sellers, and assisting and/or representing 3P sellers
`
`in connection with the suspension of their accounts and product listings. NILSEN also
`.
`has made sales on the Amazon Marketplace through numerous 3P accounts in his name,
`
`the names of others, and dozens of aliases that he uses in order to conceal his identity and
`
`his association with the 3P accounts from Amazon.
`
`l 2 3 4 5
`
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`
`l7.
`HADIS NUHANOVIC (“NUHANOVIC”) is a resident of Acworth,
`10 Georgia, and is the owner of Buddibox, LLC (“Buddibox”), a Georgia company.
`
`11 NUHANOVIC operated a 3P account under the name “Buddibox” between in or around
`
`12 October 2013 and in or around August 2018, when Amazon suspended the account for
`
`13
`
`fraud. Since August 2018, NUHANOVIC has continued to operate 3P accounts under
`
`14 various aliases that he uses in order to conceal his identity and his association with the 3P
`
`15
`
`accounts from Amazon. NUHANOVIC also offers fee-based consulting services to other
`
`16
`
`3P sellers.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`18.
`
`KRISTEN LECCESE (“LECCESE”) is a resident of New York, New York,
`
`.
`
`and marketed herself as the Vice President ofDigital Checkmate. In conjunction with
`
`19 NILSEN, NUHANOVIC, and others, LECCESE assisted in providing consulting services
`
`20‘ and also has operated numerous 3P accounts on the Amazon Marketplace.
`21
`19.
`ROHIT KADIMISETTY (“KADIMISETTY”) is a resident ofNorthridge,
`22 California. Between in or around September 2014 and in or around December 2015,
`
`23 KADIMISETTY worked as an Amazon Seller Support Associate in Hyderabad, India.
`
`24 Since in or about January 2017, KADIMISETTY has lived in California and provided
`
`25
`
`26
`
`consulting services for 3P sellers.
`
`,
`
`20.
`
`NISHAD KUNJU (“KUNJU”), aka “Tina” and “Jonathan Li,” is a resident
`
`27 of Hyderabad, India. Until his termination in or around August 2018, KUNJU worked as
`
`28
`
`an Amazon Seller Support Associate in Hyderabad, India. In this position, before his ‘
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenberg, et a]. — 10 i
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET> SUHE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553—7970
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 11 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 11 of 38
`
`\Dooflmm-hUJNb—I
`
`NNNNNNNNND—‘r—‘i—‘H‘Hl—‘Hl—‘l—‘HmflmmgwwHOKDOOflmm-PWNt—‘O
`
`termination in or about August 2018, KUNJU helped manage the operation of the
`Amazon Marketplace, and was granted restricted access to tools and files on the Amazon
`
`network relevant to his roles and responsibilities. Such access privileges enabled him to
`
`review and download internal Amazon SOPS and Wikis, review and download data
`
`regarding 3P sellers and products, enforce suspensions against 3P. sellers and products,
`
`and reverse certain enforcement actions. After his August 2018 termination, KUNJU
`
`performed fee—based consulting for 3P sellers, including through NILSEN,
`
`NUHANOVIC, and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury.
`
`COUNT 1
`
`(Conspiracy)
`
`21 .
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 20 of this Indictment are
`
`re-alleged and incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
`
`A.
`
`THE OFFENSE
`
`22.
`
`Beginning at a date unknown, but no later than July 2017, and continuing
`
`through September 2020, at Seattle, within the Western District of Washington, and
`
`elsewhere, the defendants, EPHRAIM ROSENBERG, JOSEPH NILSEN, HADIS V
`
`NUHANOVIC, KRISTEN LECCESE, ROHIT KADIMISETTY, and NISHAD KUNJU, ‘
`and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, did knowingly and intentionally
`
`combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together to commit offenses against the United
`States, to wit:
`l
`
`a.
`
`to use a facility in interstate and foreign commerce, namely, the
`
`wires, with the intent to promote, manage, establish, carry on and facilitate the
`
`promotion, management, establishment, and carrying on of an unlawful activity, that is,
`Commercial Bribery, in violation ofNew York Penal Code Section 180.03, and California
`Penal Code § 641.3, in Violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1952(a)(3)(A);
`
`and,
`
`b.
`
`to intentionally access a computer without authorization, and exceed
`
`authorized access to a computer, and aid and abet the same, and thereby obtain
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenberg, et a]. - 11
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553-7970
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 12 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 12 of 38
`
`
`
`\DOO\lO\m4>UJNt—*
`
`NNNNNNNNNQHHH'H'HHHHHooqoxmbwwhtoxoooqombwmao
`
`information from a protected computer, for purposes of commercial advantage or private
`financial gain, and to obtain information with a value that exceeds $5,000, in Violation of
`Title 18, United States Code, Sections 103 0(a)(2)(C) and (c)(2)(B)(i) and (iii).
`
`B.
`
`OBJECTS OF THE CONSPIRACY
`
`'
`
`23.
`It was an objective of the conspiracy to provide 3P sellers with an
`illegitimate competitive advantage on the Amazon Marketplace, and to benefit those 3P
`
`sellers’ financially, by gaining unauthorized access to the systems, processes, and
`
`information that regulate the Amazon Marketplace, and using that access baselessly and
`
`fraudulently to benefit certain 3P accounts and product listings and to harm other 3P
`
`accounts and product listings.
`24.
`It was an objective of the conspiracy to enhance the marketability and
`
`financial success of consulting operations to 3P sellers that relied on recruiting Amazon
`insiders, providing bribes and promises of bribes to those insiders, and obtaining benefits
`
`from those insiders in exchange for bribes and the promise of bribes.
`
`It was an objective of the conspiracy to conceal, protect, and perpetuate the
`25.
`commercial success of 3P sellers and consultants who relied on commercial bribery and
`
`unauthorized access to Amazon’s protected computer network,
`C. MANNER AND' MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY
`
`26.
`
`The manner and means used to accomplish the conspiracy included the
`
`following:
`
`It was part of the conspiracy that the Defendants, and others known
`a.
`and unknown to the Grand Jury, collaborated to provide fee—based consulting services to
`
`3P sellers.
`
`’
`
`b.
`
`It was part of the conSpiracy that the Defendants, and others known
`
`and unknown to the Grand Jury, recruited Amazon employees and contractors to accept
`
`bribes. It was further part of the conspiracy that such recruitment relied on information
`that other Amazon insiders misappropriated from Amazon’s protected computer network
`regarding employees’ and contractors’ identities, roles, and contact information. It was
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenberg, et a]. - 12
`
`’
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553—7970
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 13 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 13 of 38
`
`\OOOQOUWAUJNt—‘t
`
`NNNNNNNNNH-l—‘P—‘t—‘D—‘l—‘l—‘t—Jl—dl—t
`
`further part of the conspiracy that such recruitment targeted employees and contractors
`with roles, responsibilities, knowledge, and access privileges that would be commercially
`
`valuable to the consultants and the consultants’ 3P clients, including access to computer
`
`systems, tools, processes, and information on Amazon’s protected computer network that
`
`could help secure an unfair competitive advantage over other 3P sellers.
`
`0.
`
`It was part of the conspiracy that, in exchange for bribes and the
`
`promise of bribes, Amazon insiders provided the Defendants, and others known and
`unknown to the Grand Jury, with unauthorized access to Amazon‘protected computers
`and Amazon files, systems, servers, and computer networks, all of which were used in
`
`and affecting interstate or foreign commerce or communication.
`
`d.
`
`It was part of the conspiracy that defendants employed a variety of
`
`methods designed to conceal their communications, identity, and participation in the
`
`scheme. Such techniques included, but were not limited to, (i) using encrypted
`messaging platforms, such as WhatsApp, WeChat, Signal, and Telegram; (ii) creating
`
`email and other accounts, using aliases, for limited use between compartmentalized
`
`participants in the scheme; (iii) using shared cloud—based documents and file storage
`
`services; and (iv) communicating through draft and unsent email messages to avoid the
`
`transmission of emails that could be traced by law-enforcement agents.
`
`e.
`
`It was part of the conspiracy that, without Amazon’s knowledge or
`
`consent, the Defendants, and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, paid, and
`offered to pay, bribes to Amazon employees for the purpose of influencing their conduct
`in relation to their employment, specifically, in order to benefit 3P accounts operated by
`the members of the conspiracy and their clients, and to cause harm to Amazon.
`
`f.
`It was part of the conspiracy that the Defendants, and others known ‘
`and unknown to the Grand Jury, transmitted, routed, and received bribes using various
`
`means, including but not limited to bulk cash transfers, personal and cashier’s checks,
`
`standard bank wires, payment processing services like Payoneer, and online remittance
`
`and transfer serVices, such as PayPal, Remitly, Xoom, Transfast, and MoneyGram.
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenberg, ef 0]. ~ 13
`/
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET’ SUITE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553—7970
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-Cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 14 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 14 of 38
`
`
`
`g.
`
`It was part of the conspiracy that the Defendants, and others known
`
`and unknown to the Grand Jury, used aliases, apparently unrelated intermediaries, and
`
`false and fraudulent identifiers and information in order to conceal the transmission,
`
`routing, and receipt of bribes. Such concealment included, but was not limited to,
`
`ROSENBERG’S use of a PayPal account registered under the name “Tom Landry,”
`
`NUHANOVIC’S use of a PayPal account under the name “Vinara,” registered under his
`
`wife’s name, and the Amazon insiders” use of Remitly, MoneyGram, and bank accounts
`registered under the names of their associates and family members.
`
`h.
`
`It was part of the conspiracy that, in exchange for bribes and the
`
`promise of bribes, Amazon insiders provided the Defendants, and others known and
`
`unknown to the Grand Jury, with access devices, including the insiders” credentials and
`
`network access privileges, which could be and were indeed used to gain unauthorized
`
`access to Amazon protected computers.
`
`i.
`
`It part of the conspiracy that the Defendants marketed to 3P sellers
`
`and other consultants their access to Amazon insiders.
`
`j.
`
`It was part of the conspiracy that the Defendants referred 3P sellers
`
`to each other, to other consultants, to other 3P sellers, and to Amazon insiders, such that
`
`the Defendants were mutually interdependent upon each other for continued commercial
`
`success.
`
`k.
`
`It was part of the conspiracy that, in exchange for bribes and the ‘
`
`promise of bribes, Amazon insiders provided consultants and 3P sellers, including the
`Defendants, with confidential information taken from Amazon’s protected computers.
`
`The information obtained through these acts of misappropriation included, but was not
`
`limited to:
`
`i.
`
`SOPs, Wikis, and information regarding Amazon’s internal
`
`algorithms, systems, and teams;
`
`ii.
`
`client 3P account information, including annotations,
`
`\OOOQQLA-DUJNH
`
`
`
`NN[\DNN[\D{910[\J)—t»--\v—tH)—‘r—t>—t>-AH)--‘
`WQOM-RWNHOKOOOQONUI-BWNHO
`
`performance reports, and pending enforcement actions;
`
`Indictment
`United States v. Rosenberg, et a]. — 14
`
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`700 STEWART STREET’ SUITE 5220
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
`(206) 553—7970
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 15 of 38
`Case 2:20-cr-00151-RAJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/20 Page 15 of 38
`
`
`
`\OOOQQU‘I-DUJNH
`ONLh-PUJNHO'KOOOQO‘xm-bwwt—AO
`
`27
`
`28
`
`iii.
`
`competitor 3P account information, including the identity and
`
`personal identifiers of account owners and operators, performance data, and disCiplinary
`
`history;
`
`iv.
`
`customer information, inc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket