throbber
Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 1 of 63
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`No.
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
`AND EQUITABLE RELIEF
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
`corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`KELLY FITZPATRICK, an individual;
`SABRINA KELLY-KREJCI, an individual;
`KANG WANG, an unknown entity, d/b/a
`SEVENSTAR;
`PUTIAN WEISEN TRADING CO., LTD, an
`unknown entity, d/b/a LWENSTORE; JOSE A.
`PAGAN, an individual, d/b/a GAM SPORTS;
`YAN RUIQUN, an individual, d/b/a
`KALOSUHA; JESSE A. FASNACHT, an
`individual, d/b/a BRADYYER; BRADY
`MICHAEL ABBOTT, an individual;
`ZHUXIUBING, an unknown entity, d/b/a
`GOGO TRENDY; CHENMAOQING, an
`unknown entity, d/b/a MYERH STORE;
`QUANFUWOWANGLUOKEJI (SHENZHEN)
`YOUXIANGONGSI, an unknown entity, d/b/a
`KEABIE; JINJIANGSHI OUSAIER TRADE
`CO., LTD, an unknown entity, d/b/a WINJOY
`MALL;
`JINANSHITIANQIAOQUNATAISHANGMA
`OYOUXIANGONGSI, an unknown entity,
`d/b/a BIIKII;
`HANDANSHIHANSHANQUZUOCHANGM
`AOYIYOUXIANGONGSI, an unknown entity,
`d/b/a GBEEGBEE,
`
`Defendants.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 1
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 2 of 63
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`This case involves the Defendants’ unlawful and expressly prohibited
`1.
`advertisement, promotion, and/or sale of counterfeit luxury products on Amazon.com. Amazon
`brings this lawsuit to permanently prevent and enjoin Defendants Kelly Fitzpatrick
`(“Fitzpatrick”), Sabrina Kelly-Krejci (“Kelly-Krejci”) and the Seller Defendants identified
`below (collectively, “Defendants”), from causing future harm to Amazon’s customers and to
`hold Defendants accountable for their illegal actions. As set forth in detail below, this case
`revolves around a pair of individuals, Defendants Kelly Fitzpatrick and Sabrina Kelly-Krejci,
`who engage in social influencer activities on various websites and apps for the admitted
`purpose of promoting, advertising, and facilitating the sale of counterfeit luxury fashion goods
`by the Seller Defendants. Together, they engage in a sophisticated campaign of false
`advertising for the purpose of evading Amazon’s counterfeit detection tools.
`2.
`For example, Fitzpatrick and Kelly-Krejci publish videos, photographs, and
`detailed descriptions of clearly infringing products on their social media and other websites and
`apps, and link to offer listing pages in the Amazon store. Fitzpatrick and Kelly-Krejci refer to
`the products they promote as “dupes,” a fashion industry term that connotes items that may
`have similarities to a designer item but that do not copy logos or trademarked features.
`However, that is not what Fitzpatrick and Kelly-Krejci are advertising to their followers: these
`so-called “dupes” are obviously counterfeit goods that blatantly copy the registered trademarks
`of luxury brands.
`3.
`Often, the Amazon pages display only a generic, seemingly non-infringing
`product; the counterfeit nature of the product is revealed only to those who order and receive
`the product. As Fitzpatrick routinely instructs her followers in social media posts: “Order
`this/Get this!” as depicted in the below July 15, 2020 post from Fitzpatrick’s @Styleeandgrace
`Instagram account:
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 2
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 3 of 63
`
`As Fitzpatrick explains to her followers, a “hidden link” means “[y]ou order a certain product
`that looks nothing like the designer dupe in order to hide the item from getting taken down [by
`Amazon] and orders being cancelled”:1
`
`In other words, order a seemingly non-infringing item in order to get a counterfeit fashion
`product – the very essence of false advertising, as the product Defendants are advertising on
`Amazon is simply a false placeholder designed to evade Amazon’s counterfeit detection
`
`1 https://www.styleeandgrace.com/video-review-dior-saddle-bag-amazon-hidden-link-find/
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 3
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 4 of 63
`
`systems. Once the orders are placed, the Seller Defendants and other bad actors then ship
`counterfeit products to customers. Contrary to Fitzpatrick’s assertion, however, Amazon does
`not “let the links sell out”; rather, Amazon blocks the product as soon as it becomes aware of
`the true infringing nature. But Fitzpatrick and Kelly-Krejci are persistent in their promotion of
`counterfeit items. When Instagram and other websites and apps have removed their social
`media accounts, Fitzpatrick and Kelly-Krejci have simply created new accounts to continue
`their illicit activities.
`4.
`For all their deceptive advertising, Fitzpatrick and Kelly-Krejci make no efforts to
`conceal their true motive behind this scheme: Hiding the counterfeits from Amazon, which
`employs sophisticated brand protections to prevent infringing items from ever being advertised
`in the Amazon store. Indeed, after Amazon became aware of Fitzpatrick’s “Order this, get
`this” scheme and shut down the offending order pages, Fitzpatrick lamented to her followers,
`“Amazon has rarely has [sic] any dupes lately and that’s because they’ve cracked down so
`hard.”2 As a result of Amazon having “cracked down so hard” on “dupes,” Fitzpatrick began
`directing her followers to other e-commerce websites: “I know it’s a big change to switch from
`Amazon to [a different website] but this [switch] guarantees that the links do not get reported
`and shut down….” (Emphasis added.)3 Similarly, Kelly-Krejci has directed her followers to
`use “hidden links” to order counterfeit products, emphasizing that she “know[s] some people
`feel weird ordering from hidden links but in this case you will get something fabulous.”4 A
`“hidden link” is one where the offer listing page shows a generic, non-infringing item but the
`product that is actually delivered is different from what is shown.
`
`II. BACKGROUND
`5. The Amazon store offers products and services to customers in more than 100
`countries around the globe. Some of the products are sold directly by Amazon, while others are
`
`2 https://www.styleeandgrace.com/video-review-cc-wristlet-clutch-bag-trusted-dh-gate-seller-previously-on-
`amazon/
`3 https://www.styleeandgrace.com/video-review-cc-wristlet-clutch-bag-trusted-dh-gate-seller-previously-on-
`amazon/
`4 https://budgetstylefiles.com/review-cc-wristlet-ama-z0n/
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 4
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 5 of 63
`
`sold by Amazon’s numerous selling partners. The Amazon brand is one of the most well-
`recognized, valuable, and trusted brands in the world. In order to protect customers and
`safeguard its reputation for trustworthiness, Amazon invests heavily in both time and resources
`to prevent counterfeit goods from being sold in its store.
`6.
`From in or about November 2019 through the filing of the Complaint, Defendants
`have advertised, marketed, offered, and/or sold counterfeit luxury products to deceive Amazon
`and customers about the authenticity and origin of the products and the products’ affiliation
`with various luxury brands.
`7. As a result of their illegal actions, Defendants have willfully deceived and harmed
`Amazon and its customers, compromised the integrity of the Amazon store, and undermined
`the trust that customers place in Amazon. Defendants’ illegal actions have caused Amazon to
`expend significant resources to investigate and combat Defendants’ wrongdoing and to bring
`this lawsuit to prevent Defendants from inflicting future harm to Amazon and its customers.
`
`III.PARTIES
`Amazon.com, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in
`8.
`Seattle, Washington. Through its subsidiaries, Amazon.com, Inc. owns and operates the
`Amazon.com website, counterpart international websites, and the Amazon store (collectively,
`“Amazon”).
`9. Defendants are a collection of individuals and entities who conspired and operated
`in concert with each other to engage in the counterfeiting scheme alleged in this Complaint. In
`some cases, the Seller Defendants took intentional and affirmative steps to attempt to hide their
`true identities and whereabouts from Amazon by using fake names and contact information,
`and unregistered businesses to conduct their activities. Defendants are liable for their wrongful
`conduct both directly and under principles of secondary liability, including, without limitation,
`respondeat superior and/or vicarious liability.
`10. On information and belief, Defendant Kelly Fitzpatrick is an individual who
`resides in Islip Terrace, New York who personally participated in and/or had the right and
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 5
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 6 of 63
`
`ability to supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and
`derived a direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`11. On information and belief, Defendant Sabrina Kelly-Krejci is an individual who
`resides in Beloit, Wisconsin who personally participated in and/or had the right and ability to
`supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a
`direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`12. On information and belief, Defendant Kang Wang d/b/a Sevenstar is an individual
`who resides in China who personally participated in and/or had the right and ability to
`supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a
`direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`13. On information and belief, Defendant Putian Weisen Trading Co., Ltd d/b/a
`Lwenstore is a business based in China that participated in and/or had the right and ability to
`supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a
`direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`14. On information and belief, Defendant Jose A. Pagan d/b/a Gam Sports is an
`individual who resides in Kissimmee, Florida who personally participated in and/or had the
`right and ability to supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this
`Complaint, and derived a direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`15. On information and belief, Defendant Yang Ruiqun d/b/a Kaloshua is an individual
`who resides in China who personally participated in and/or had the right and ability to
`supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a
`direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`16. On information and belief, Jesse A. Fasnacht d/b/a Bradyyer is an individual who
`resides in Norristown, Pennsylvania who personally participated in and/or had the right and
`ability to supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and
`derived a direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`17. On information and belief, Brady Michael Abbott is an individual who resides in
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 6
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 7 of 63
`
`Norristown, Pennsylvania who personally participated in and/or had the right and ability to
`supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a
`direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`18. On information and belief, Defendant Zhuxiubing d/b/a Gogo Trendy is a business
`based in China that participated in and/or had the right and ability to supervise, direct, and
`control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a direct financial benefit
`from that wrongful conduct.
`19. On information and belief, Defendant Chenmaoqing d/b/a Myerh Store is a
`business based in China that participated in and/or had the right and ability to supervise, direct,
`and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a direct financial
`benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`20. On information and belief, Defendant Quanfuwowangluokeji (Shenzhen)
`youxiangongsi d/b/a Keabie is a business based in China that participated in and/or had the
`right and ability to supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this
`Complaint, and derived a direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`21. On information and belief, Defendant Jinjiangshi Ousaier Trade Co., Ltd d/b/a
`Winjoy Mall is a business based in China that participated in and/or had the right and ability to
`supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a
`direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`22. On information and belief, Defendant
`jinanshitianqiaoqunataishangmaoyouxiangongsi d/b/a BIIKII is a business based in China that
`participated in and/or had the right and ability to supervise, direct, and control the wrongful
`conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a direct financial benefit from that wrongful
`conduct.
`On information and belief, Defendant
`23.
`handanshihanshanquzuochangmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a GbeeGbee is a business based in
`China that participated in and/or had the right and ability to supervise, direct, and control the
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 7
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 8 of 63
`
`wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a direct financial benefit from that
`wrongful conduct.
`
`IV. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Amazon’s Lanham Act claims for
`24.
`false designation and false advertising and for contributory false designation and false
`advertising, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). The Court also
`has subject matter jurisdiction over Amazon’s claim for violation of the Washington Consumer
`Protection Act, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1367.
`25.
`The Court has personal jurisdiction over all Defendants because they transacted
`business and committed tortious acts within and directed to the State of Washington, and
`Amazon’s claims arise from those activities. Defendants affirmatively undertook to do
`business with Amazon, a corporation with its principal place of business in Washington, by
`promoting, advertising or selling counterfeit products in the Amazon store. Defendants
`advertised and/or shipped products bearing counterfeit products to consumers in Washington.
`Each of the Defendants committed, or facilitated the commission of, tortious acts in
`Washington and has wrongfully caused Amazon substantial injury in Washington.
`26.
`In addition, the Seller Defendants have consented to the jurisdiction of this
`Court by agreeing to the Amazon Services Business Solutions Agreement (“BSA”), which
`provides that the “Governing Courts” for claims to enjoin infringement or misuse of intellectual
`property rights are state or federal courts located in King County, Washington.
`27.
`Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because a
`substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in the Western District of
`Washington.
`Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 3(d), intra-district assignment to the Seattle
`28.
`Division is proper because the claims arose in this Division, where (a) Amazon resides,
`(b) injuries giving rise to suit occurred, and (c) Defendants directed their unlawful conduct.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 8
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 9 of 63
`
`V. FACTS
`Amazon’s Efforts to Prevent the Sale of Counterfeit Goods
`A.
`Amazon works hard to build and protect the reputation of its store as a place
`29.
`where customers can conveniently select from a wide array of authentic goods and services at
`competitive prices. Amazon invests a vast amount of resources to ensure that when customers
`make purchases through the Amazon store—either directly from Amazon or from one of its
`millions of third-party sellers—customers receive authentic products made by the true
`manufacturer of those products.
`30.
`A small number of bad actors seeks to take advantage of the trust customers
`place in Amazon by attempting to create Amazon Selling Accounts to advertise, market, offer,
`and sell counterfeit products. These bad actors seek to misuse and infringe the trademarks and
`other IP of the true manufacturers of those products to deceive Amazon and its customers. This
`unlawful and expressly prohibited conduct undermines the trust that customers, sellers, and
`manufacturers place in Amazon, and tarnishes Amazon’s brand and reputation, thereby causing
`irreparable harm to Amazon.
`31.
`Amazon prohibits the sale of inauthentic and fraudulent products and is
`constantly innovating on behalf of customers and working with brands, manufacturers, rights
`owners, and others to improve the detection of counterfeit products and prevention of
`counterfeit products ever being offered to customers through the Amazon store. Amazon
`employs dedicated teams of software engineers, research scientists, program managers, and
`investigators to prevent counterfeits from being offered in the Amazon store. Amazon’s
`systems automatically and continuously scan thousands of data points to detect and remove
`counterfeits from its store and to terminate the Selling Accounts of bad actors before they can
`offer counterfeit products. Each week Amazon monitors more than 45 million pieces of
`feedback it receives from customers, rights owners, regulators, and selling partners. When
`Amazon identifies issues based on this feedback, it takes action to address them. Amazon also
`uses this intelligence to improve its proactive prevention controls.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 9
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 10 of 63
`
`In 2017, Amazon launched the Amazon Brand Registry, a free service to any
`32.
`rights owner with a government-registered trademark, regardless of the brand’s relationship
`with Amazon. Brand Registry delivers automated brand protections that use machine learning
`to predict infringement and proactively protect brands’ IP. Brand Registry also provides a
`powerful Report a Violation Tool that allows brands to search for and accurately report
`potentially infringing products using state‐of-the‐art image search technology. More than
`350,000 brands are enrolled in Brand Registry, and those brands are finding and reporting 99%
`fewer suspected infringements since joining Brand Registry.
`33.
`In 2018, Amazon launched Transparency, a product serialization service that
`effectively eliminates counterfeits for enrolled products. Brands enrolled in Transparency can
`apply a unique 2D code to every unit they manufacture, which allows Amazon, other retailers,
`law enforcement, and customers to determine the authenticity of any Transparency-enabled
`product, regardless of where the product was purchased. Since Transparency’s launch in 2018,
`over 10,000 brands have enrolled, protecting brands and customers from counterfeits being sold
`in the Amazon store.
`34.
`In 2019, Amazon launched Amazon Project Zero, a program to empower brands
`to help Amazon drive counterfeits to zero. Amazon Project Zero introduced a novel self-
`service counterfeit removal tool that enables brands to remove counterfeit listings directly from
`the Amazon store. This enables brands to take down counterfeit product offerings on their own
`within minutes. Since the program launched in 2019, over 10,000 brands have enrolled.
`35.
`In addition to these measures, Amazon actively cooperates with rights owners
`and law enforcement to identify and prosecute bad actors suspected of engaging in illegal
`activity. Lawsuits, like this one, are integral components of Amazon’s efforts to combat
`counterfeits.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 10
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 11 of 63
`
`B.
`
`Seller Defendants Created Amazon Selling Accounts and Agreed Not to Sell
`Counterfeit Goods
`The Seller Defendants controlled and operated the Amazon Selling Accounts
`36.
`detailed in section D & H below through which they sought to advertise, market, sell, and
`distribute counterfeit products. In connection with these Selling Accounts, the Seller
`Defendants provided names, email addresses, and banking information for each account.
`37.
`To become a selling partner in the Amazon store, sellers are required to agree to
`the Amazon Business Solutions Agreement (BSA), which governs the applicant’s access to and
`use of Amazon’s services and states Amazon’s rules for selling through the website. By
`entering into the BSA, each seller represents and warrants that it “will comply with all
`applicable laws in [the] performance of [its] obligations and exercise of [its] rights” under the
`BSA. A true and correct copy of the applicable version of the BSA, namely, the version when
`Seller Defendants last used Amazon’s Services, is attached as Exhibit A.
`38.
`The BSA incorporates and sellers therefore agree to be bound by Amazon’s
`Anti-Counterfeiting Policy, the applicable version of which is attached as Exhibit B. The Anti-
`Counterfeiting Policy expressly prohibits the sale of counterfeit goods in the Amazon store:
`
` The sale of counterfeit products is strictly prohibited.
` You may not sell any products that are not legal for sale, such as products
`that have been illegally replicated, reproduced, or manufactured[.]
` You must provide records about the authenticity of your products if Amazon
`requests that documentation[.]
`Failure to abide by this policy may result in loss of selling privileges, funds
`being withheld, destruction of inventory in our fulfilment centers, and other
`legal consequences.
`Amazon’s Anti-Counterfeiting Policy further describes Amazon’s commitment
`39.
`to preventing the sale and distribution of counterfeit goods in the Amazon store together with
`the consequences of doing so:
`
` Sell Only Authentic and Legal Products. It is your
`responsibility to source, sell, and fulfill only authentic
`products that are legal for sale. Examples of prohibited
`products include:
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 11
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 12 of 63
`
`o Bootlegs, fakes, or pirated copies of products or content
`o Products that have been illegally replicated, reproduced,
`or manufactured
`o Products that infringe another party’s intellectual property
`rights
`
` Maintain and Provide Inventory Records. Amazon may
`request that you provide documentation (such as invoices)
`showing the authenticity of your products or your
`authorization to list them for sale. You may remove pricing
`information from these documents, but providing documents
`that have been edited in any other way or that are misleading
`is a violation of this policy and will lead to enforcement
`against your account.
`
` Consequences of Selling Inauthentic Products. If you sell
`inauthentic products, we may immediately suspend or
`terminate your Amazon selling account (and any related
`accounts), destroy any inauthentic products in our fulfillment
`centers at your expense, and/or withhold payments to you.
`
` Amazon Takes Action to Protect Customers and Rights
`Owners. Amazon also works with manufacturers, rights
`holders, content owners, vendors, and sellers to improve the
`ways we detect and prevent inauthentic products from
`reaching our customers. As a result of our detection and
`enforcement activities, Amazon may:
`o Remove suspect listings.
`o Take legal action against parties who knowingly violate
`this policy and harm our customers. In addition to
`criminal fines and imprisonment, sellers and suppliers of
`inauthentic products may face civil penalties including the
`loss of any amounts received from the sale of inauthentic
`products, the damage or harm sustained by the rights
`holders, statutory and other damages, and attorney’s fees.
`
` Reporting Inauthentic Products. We stand behind the products
`sold on our site with our A-to-z Guarantee, and we encourage
`rights owners who have product authenticity concerns to
`notify us. We will promptly investigate and take all
`appropriate actions to protect customers, sellers, and rights
`holders. You may view counterfeit complaints on the
`Account Health page in Seller Central.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 12
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 13 of 63
`
`40. When they registered as sellers in the Amazon store, and established their
`Selling Accounts, Seller Defendants agreed not to advertise, market, offer, sell, or distribute
`counterfeit products.
`
`C.
`
`Defendant Kelly Fitzpatrick Advertised, Promoted, and Facilitated Sales of
`Sellers’ Counterfeit Products.
`Fitzpatrick is very active on social media and attempts to monetize her presence
`41.
`by promoting counterfeit products. Fitzpatrick’s social media accounts are entitled
`“Styleeandgrace” or other iterations or variations on that name, such as “Gracefullystylish.”
`Fitzpatrick uses an array of social media websites and apps to advertise counterfeit products,
`including Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Twitter, and the website liketoknow.it. She also
`created her own website, Styleeandgrace.com, to promote counterfeit luxury products. On
`these websites, Fitzpatrick posts photos and videos of counterfeit products, highlighting their
`false designation of origin – indeed, in one video promoting a counterfeit Gucci belt, she
`celebrated a false “Made in Italy” designation of origin.5 For products sold on Amazon,
`Fitzpatrick then provides a link to an Amazon store order page where the counterfeit product
`can be ordered (although the product is often disguised on the order page as a non-infringing
`product).
`Amazon’s Associate Program works with legitimate social media influencers
`42.
`such as content creators, publishers, and bloggers and helps them monetize their traffic by
`earning fees for sharing Amazon products with their followers. Amazon Associates are
`prohibited from advertising or promoting products that violate the intellectual property rights of
`others.
`On November 23, 2019, Fitzpatrick joined the Amazon Associates program with
`43.
`the username Kellyfitzpa02-20.
`44.
`On March 6, 2020, Amazon warned Fitzpatrick that she had been advertising
`counterfeit products in violation of the Amazon Associates program.
`
`5 https://www.styleeandgrace.com/video-review-gg-large-pearl-belt-amazon-finds/
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 13
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 14 of 63
`
`On March 7, 2020, after receiving additional evidence of Fitzpatrick’s
`45.
`promotion of counterfeit products, Amazon closed Fitzpatrick’s Kellyfitzpa02-20 Associate
`account.
`Upon information and belief, in April and May 2020, Fitzpatrick attempted to
`46.
`open at least two other Associate accounts, kellyfitz-20 and budgetstylefi-20, and worked with
`Kelly-Krejci to open at least one of those accounts.
`47.
`Amazon closed these two Associate accounts based on their relationship with
`Fitzpatrick.
`Even after Fitzpatrick was blocked from participating in the Amazon Associates
`48.
`program, she continued to use her social media websites and apps to advertise counterfeit
`products in the Amazon store. On information and belief, Fitzpatrick was paid directly by
`Seller Defendants for her promotions.
`49.
`For example, from April through at least July 2020, Fitzpatrick used her
`Instagram @Styleeandgrace to advertise counterfeit products sold on Amazon.com.
`50.
`As shown in the test purchases below, Fitzpatrick deceived Amazon and its
`customers by working with Seller Defendants to remove indicia of infringement from the
`Amazon offer listing page in order to evade Amazon’s fraud and counterfeit detection tools.
`Because the offer listing pages displayed general, non-infringing products without any brand or
`trademark identification, only Fitzpatrick’s followers knew that the products for sale were
`counterfeits based upon Fitzpatrick’s explicit instruction and links. Any customers who wanted
`to order the non-infringing item that was listed in Amazon’s store, such as the plain black belt
`and wallet described below, would have received a different product from what they were
`expecting.
`On July 27, 2020, Fitzpatrick admitted on her Instagram page that she
`51.
`communicates directly with the Amazon sellers she promotes, in the context of describing her
`relationship with a non-Amazon seller: “Please know that I am not in contact with these sellers
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 14
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 15 of 63
`
`and cannot help you with returns like I do with the sellers on amazon and Instagram.”
`(Emphasis added.)
`
`On July 27, 2020, on information and belief, Instagram took down Fitzpatrick’s
`52.
`@Styleeandgrace account.
`53. Thereafter, on July 31, 2020, Fitzpatrick created a new Instagram account under the
`name @Gracefullystylish to advertise counterfeit products sold on Amazon. Although
`Fitzpatrick futilely tried to distance herself from illicit counterfeiting activity by describing
`herself as, “Not a seller, I just review,” she immediately posted a link to counterfeit products
`under “Shop my favorites here.”
`
`54.
`
`On August 10, 2020, Instagram took down Fitzpatrick’s @Gracefullystylish
`
`page.
`
`One day later, on August 11, 2020, Fitzpatrick created yet another Instagram
`55.
`account, @styleeandgrace11, and launched her own website, Styleeandgrace.com. On this
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 15
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01662 Document 1 Filed 11/12

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket