throbber
Case 2:20-cv-01850 Document 1 Filed 12/28/20 Page 1 of 6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`PEARL IP LICENSING LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`
` Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 20-CV-1850
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Plaintiff Pearl IP Licensing LLC, by and through the undersigned counsel,
`
`files this Complaint for patent infringement against Defendant, and in support
`
`states, all upon information and belief:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Pearl IP Licensing LLC (“Pearl IP” or “Plaintiff”) is a limited
`
`liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas and
`
`having its registered office at 815 Brazos St, Ste 500, Austin, TX 78701 and an
`
`office address at 2108 Dallas Pkwy, Ste 214 - 1042, Plano, TX 750 93-4362.
`
`COMPLAINT
`20-cv-1850 - 1
`
`MANN LAW GROUP PLLC
`1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Phone: 206-436-0900
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01850 Document 1 Filed 12/28/20 Page 2 of 6
`
`2.
`
`Defendant HTC America, Inc. (“HTC” or “Defendant”) is a
`
`corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington, with
`
`a principal place of business at 308 Occidental Avenue South – Suite 300, Seattle,
`
`Washington 98104. HTC is registered to do business, and has a registered office,
`
`in this State at Cogency Global, Inc., 1780 Barnes Boulevard SW, Tumwater,
`
`Washington 98512.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`Defendant conducts business operations within the Western District of
`
`Washington. Defendant has directly and/or through subsidiaries or intermediaries
`
`committed and continues to commit acts of infringement in this District by, among
`
`other things, offering to sell and selling products that infringe the patent-in-suit.
`
`4.
`
`Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)-(d).
`
`Defendant is registered to do business in the State of Washington, has an office in
`
`the State of Washington, has transacted business in the Western District of
`
`Washington and has committed acts of direct infringement in the Western District
`
`of Washington.
`
`5.
`
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).
`
`Defendant maintains a regular and established place of business in this District.
`
`COMPLAINT
`20-cv-1850 - 2
`
`MANN LAW GROUP PLLC
`1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Phone: 206-436-0900
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01850 Document 1 Filed 12/28/20 Page 3 of 6
`
`PATENT 6,819,539
`
`6.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,819,539, entitled “Method For Circuit Recovery
`
`From Overstress Conditions” (the “539 Patent”) was duly and legally issued on
`
`November 16, 2004. A true and correct copy of the ’539 Patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit A.
`
`7.
`
`The ‘539 Patent disclosed and exemplified a unique and valuable
`
`apparatus for circuit recovery from overstress conditions, comprising circuits for
`
`detecting an event and resetting a device when the event is a first predetermined
`
`type and circuits for providing recovery when the event is a second predetermined
`
`type. (See ‘539 Patent Abstract).
`
`8.
`
`Plaintiff is the named assignee of, owns all right, title and interest in,
`
`and has standing to sue and recover all past damages for infringement of the ‘539
`
`Patent.
`
`COUNT I – INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’539 PATENT
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiff restates and incorporates by reference the foregoing
`
`allegations.
`
`COMPLAINT
`20-cv-1850 - 3
`
`MANN LAW GROUP PLLC
`1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Phone: 206-436-0900
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01850 Document 1 Filed 12/28/20 Page 4 of 6
`
`10.
`
` In violation of 35 U.S.C. §271, Defendant directly infringed at least
`
`claim 8 of the ‘539 Patent by selling apparatus within the scope of claim 8 of the
`
`‘539 Patent (“Accused Instrumentality”).
`
`11.
`
` Attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by reference, is
`
`a claim chart detailing the correspondence between one exemplary version of an
`
`Accused Instrumentality and claim 8 of the ’539 Patent.
`
`12.
`
` Defendant has had knowledge of infringement of the ‘539 Patent at
`
`least as of the service of the present Complaint.
`
`13.
`
` As a result of Defendant’s infringement of the ’539 Patent, Plaintiff
`
`has suffered damages.
`
`14.
`
` Plaintiff is entitled to a money judgment in an amount adequate to
`
`compensate for Defendant’s infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable
`
`royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendant, together with interest and
`
`costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`15.
`
` Plaintiff reserves the right to modify its infringement theories as
`
`discovery progresses in this case; it shall not be estopped for infringement
`
`contention or claim construction purposes by the claim charts that it provides with
`
`this Complaint. The claim chart depicted in Exhibit B is intended to satisfy the
`
`COMPLAINT
`20-cv-1850 - 4
`
`MANN LAW GROUP PLLC
`1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Phone: 206-436-0900
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01850 Document 1 Filed 12/28/20 Page 5 of 6
`
`notice requirements of Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and
`
`does not represent Plaintiff’s preliminary or final infringement contentions or
`
`preliminary or final claim construction positions.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`16. Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of any and all causes of action.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Plaintiff Pearl IP respectfully requests that the Court find in its favor and
`
`against Defendant, and that the Court grant Plaintiff the following relief:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`an adjudication that Defendant has infringed the ’539 Patent;
`
`an award of damages to be paid by Defendant adequate to compensate
`
`Plaintiff for Defendant’s past infringement of the ’539 Patent through its
`
`expiration, including pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, costs, expenses,
`
`and an accounting of all infringing acts; and
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`COMPLAINT
`20-cv-1850 - 5
`
`MANN LAW GROUP PLLC
`1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Phone: 206-436-0900
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01850 Document 1 Filed 12/28/20 Page 6 of 6
`
`c.
`
`any and all such further relief at law or in equity that the Court may
`
`deem just and proper, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees.
`
`DATED this 28th day of December, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: s/ Philip P. Mann
`
`Philip P. Mann, WSBA No. 28860
`MANN LAW GROUP PLLC
`1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Telephone: (206) 436-0900
`email: phil@mannlawgroup.com
`
`Howard L. Wernow
`(Pro Hac Vice to be applied for)
`SAND, SEBOLT & WERNOW CO., LPA
`Aegis Tower - Suite 1100
`4940 Munson Street, N. W.
`Canton, Ohio 44718
`Telephone: (330)244-1174
`Facsimile: (330) 244-1173
`Email: howard.wernow@sswip.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`PEARL IP LICENSING LLC,
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`20-cv-1850 - 6
`
`MANN LAW GROUP PLLC
`1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Phone: 206-436-0900
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket