throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 1 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; and SALVATORE FERRAGAMO
`S.P.A., an Italian corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`ZHAO HAO JUN, an individual d/b/a
`ZHAOHA032OJUN; ZHANG LIANFA, an
`individual d/b/a
`CANGZHOUSHUOFENGDIANZIKEJIZZX;
`CANGZHOUSHUOFENGDIANZIKEJIYOUX
`IANGONGSI, a Chinese entity; and DOES 1-
`10,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
`AND EQUITABLE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`This case involves the Defendants’ unlawful and expressly prohibited sale of
`
`counterfeit Salvatore Ferragamo S.p.A. (“Ferragamo”) belts on Amazon.com. Amazon and
`
`Ferragamo jointly bring this lawsuit to permanently prevent and enjoin Defendants from
`
`causing future harm to Amazon’s and Ferragamo’s customers, reputations, and intellectual
`
`property, and to hold Defendants accountable for their illegal actions.
`
`2.
`
`The Amazon store offers products and services to customers in more than 100
`
`countries around the globe. Some of the products are sold directly by Amazon, while others are
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 1
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 2 of 23
`
`
`
`
`sold by Amazon’s numerous third-party selling partners. The Amazon brand is one of the most
`
`well-recognized, valuable, and trusted brands in the world. In order to protect customers and
`
`safeguard its reputation for trustworthiness, Amazon invests heavily in both time and resources
`
`to prevent counterfeit goods from being sold in its store. In 2019 alone, Amazon invested over
`
`$500 million and employed more than 8,000 employees to protect its store from fraud and
`
`abuse. Amazon stopped over 2.5 million suspected bad actor selling accounts before they
`
`published a single listing for sale and blocked more than six billion suspected bad listings
`
`before they were published. As a result of these efforts and investment, 99.9% of all products
`
`viewed by customers on Amazon did not have a valid counterfeit complaint.
`
`3.
`
`Ferragamo, which has always been a byword for top quality and Made in Italy
`
`products, is one of the main players in the luxury industry and its origins date back to 1927.
`
`Ferragamo is mainly active in the creation, production and sale of footwear, leather goods,
`
`apparel, silk products, and other accessories, as well as fragrances for men and women. Taking
`
`into account the entire distribution network, Ferragamo is present in over 90 countries all over
`
`the world with several retail stores in the United States, including one in Bellevue, Washington.
`
`Ferragamo works constantly to consolidate and increase over time the value of the brand and
`
`maintain high quality standards for the products and distribution processes through investments
`
`in research, product innovation, IT and business support.
`
`4.
`
`Ferragamo owns, manages, enforces, licenses, and maintains intellectual
`
`property, including various trademarks. Relevant to this Complaint, Ferragamo owns the
`
`following registered trademarks (“Ferragamo Trademarks”).
`
`Mark
`
`Registration No. (International
`Classes)
`
`SALVATORE FERRAGAMO
`
`1,016,032 (IC 010, 025, 026)
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 2
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 3 of 23
`
`1,208,600 (IC 026)
`
`1,609,161 (IC 025)
`
`2,051,981 (IC 025)
`
`
`
`4,514,247 (IC 018, 025)
`
`
`
`
`
`4,578,196 (IC 018, 025)
`
`6,127,042 (IC 025)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`True and correct copies of the registration certificates for the Ferragamo Trademarks are
`
`attached as Exhibit A.
`
`5.
`
`From February 2020 through November 2020, Defendants advertised, marketed,
`
`offered, and sold counterfeit Ferragamo products in the Amazon store, using Ferragamo’s
`
`registered trademarks, without authorization, to deceive customers about the authenticity and
`
`origin of the products and the products’ affiliation with Ferragamo.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 3
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 4 of 23
`
`
`
`
`6.
`
`As a result of their illegal actions, Defendants have infringed and misused
`
`Ferragamo’s intellectual property (“IP”), willfully deceived and harmed Amazon, Ferragamo,
`
`and their customers, compromised the integrity of the Amazon store, and undermined the trust
`
`that customers place in Amazon and Ferragamo. Defendants’ illegal actions have caused
`
`Amazon and Ferragamo to expend significant resources to investigate and combat Defendants’
`
`wrongdoing and to bring this lawsuit to prevent Defendants from inflicting future harm to
`
`Amazon, Ferragamo, and their customers.
`
`II.
`
`PARTIES
`
`7.
`
`Amazon.com, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business
`
`in Seattle, Washington. Through its subsidiaries, Amazon.com, Inc. owns and operates the
`
`Amazon.com website, counterpart international websites, and the Amazon store (collectively,
`
`“Amazon”).
`
`8.
`
`Ferragamo is an Italian corporation with its principal place of business in
`
`Florence, Italy.
`
`9.
`
`Defendants are a collection of individuals, both known and unknown, who
`
`conspired and operated in concert with each other to engage in the counterfeiting scheme
`
`alleged in this Complaint. In many cases, Defendants took intentional and affirmative steps to
`
`hide their true identities and whereabouts from Amazon and Ferragamo by using fake names
`
`and contact information, and unregistered businesses to conduct their activities. Defendants are
`
`subject to liability for their wrongful conduct both directly and under principles of secondary
`
`liability including, without limitation, respondeat superior, vicarious liability, and/or
`
`contributory infringement.
`
`10.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Zhao Hao Jun, d/b/a zhaoha032ojun, is an
`
`individual who resides in China who personally participated in and/or had the right and ability
`
`to supervise, direct, and control the wrongful conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a
`
`direct financial benefit from that wrongful conduct.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 4
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 5 of 23
`
`
`
`
`11.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Zhang Lianfa, d/b/a
`
`cangzhoushuofengdianzikejiZZX, is an individual who resides in China who personally
`
`participated in and/or had the right and ability to supervise, direct, and control the wrongful
`
`conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a direct financial benefit from that wrongful
`
`conduct.
`
`12.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant
`
`cangzhoushuofengdianzikejiyouxiangongsi is a Chinese entity with its principal place of
`
`business at Qingxiancaosizhencaosicun, Cangzhoushi, Hebeisheng, China 062652. On further
`
`information and belief, Defendant cangzhoushuofengdianzikejiyouxiangongsi personally
`
`participated in and/or had the right and ability to supervise, direct, and control the wrongful
`
`conduct alleged in this Complaint, and derived a direct financial benefit from that wrongful
`
`conduct.
`
`13.
`
`On information and belief, Defendants Does 1-10 (the “Doe Defendants”) are
`
`individuals and entities working in active concert with each other and the named Defendants to
`
`knowingly and willfully manufacture, import, advertise, market, offer, and sell counterfeit
`
`Ferragamo products. The identities of Does 1-10 are presently unknown to Plaintiffs.
`
`14.
`
`On information and belief, each Defendant has acted in concert with all
`
`Defendants and other unknown parties to willfully advertise and sell counterfeit Ferragamo
`
`products. These parties are related by the similarity of counterfeit product, indistinguishable
`
`tactics used in listings, identical pricing for all products, uniform packaging, and apparent
`
`common supplier, among other indicators.
`
`III.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`15.
`
`The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Amazon’s and Ferragamo’s
`
`Lanham Act claims for 1) trademark infringement; and 2) false designation and false
`
`advertising pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). The Court has
`
`subject matter jurisdiction over Amazon’s and Ferragamo’s claim for violation of the
`
`Washington Consumer Protection Act pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1367.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 5
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 6 of 23
`
`
`
`
`16.
`
`The Court has personal jurisdiction over all Defendants because they transacted
`
`business and committed tortious acts within and directed to the State of Washington, and
`
`Amazon’s and Ferragamo’s claims arise from those activities. Defendants affirmatively
`
`undertook to do business with Amazon, a corporation with its principal place of business in
`
`Washington, and sold through the Amazon store products bearing counterfeit versions of the
`
`Ferragamo Trademarks and which otherwise infringed Ferragamo’s IP. Defendants shipped
`
`products bearing counterfeit versions of the Ferragamo Trademarks to consumers in
`
`Washington. Each of the Defendants committed, or facilitated the commission of, tortious acts
`
`in Washington and has wrongfully caused Amazon and Ferragamo substantial injury in
`
`Washington.
`
`17.
`
`Further, the named Defendants have consented to the jurisdiction of this Court
`
`by agreeing to the Amazon Services Business Solutions Agreement (“BSA”), which provides
`
`that the “Governing Courts” for claims to enjoin infringement or misuse of intellectual property
`
`rights are state or federal courts located in King County, Washington.
`
`18.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because a
`
`substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in the Western District of
`
`Washington.
`
`19.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court also with respect to Defendants by virtue of the
`
`allegations stated in paragraph 15 above, which are incorporated herein.
`
`20.
`
`Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 3(d), intra-district assignment to the Seattle
`
`Division is proper because the claims arose in this Division, where (a) Amazon resides,
`
`(b) injuries giving rise to suit occurred, and (c) Defendants directed their unlawful conduct.
`
`IV.
`
`FACTS
`
`A.
`
`21.
`
`Amazon’s Efforts to Prevent the Sale of Counterfeit Goods
`
`Amazon works hard to build and protect the reputation of its store as a place
`
`where customers can conveniently select from a wide array of authentic goods and services at
`
`competitive prices. Amazon invests a vast amount of resources to ensure that when customers
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 6
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 7 of 23
`
`
`
`
`make purchases through the Amazon store—either directly from Amazon or from one of its
`
`millions of third-party sellers—customers receive authentic products made by the true
`
`manufacturer of those products.
`
`22.
`
`A small number of bad actors seeks to take advantage of the trust customers
`
`place in Amazon by attempting to create Amazon Selling Accounts to advertise, market, offer,
`
`and sell counterfeit products. These bad actors seek to misuse and infringe the trademarks and
`
`other IP of the true manufacturers of those products to deceive Amazon and its customers. This
`
`unlawful and expressly prohibited conduct undermines the trust that customers, sellers, and
`
`manufacturers place in Amazon, and tarnishes Amazon’s brand and reputation, thereby causing
`
`irreparable harm to Amazon.
`
`23.
`
`Amazon prohibits the sale of inauthentic and fraudulent products and is
`
`constantly innovating on behalf of customers and working with brands, manufacturers, rights
`
`owners, and others to improve the detection and prevention of counterfeit products ever being
`
`offered to customers through the Amazon store. Amazon employs dedicated teams of software
`
`engineers, research scientists, program managers, and investigators to prevent counterfeits from
`
`being offered in the Amazon store. Amazon’s systems automatically and continuously scan
`
`thousands of data points to detect and remove counterfeits from its store and to terminate the
`
`Selling Accounts of bad actors before they can offer counterfeit products. Each week Amazon
`
`monitors more than 45 million pieces of feedback it receives from customers, rights owners,
`
`regulators, and selling partners. When Amazon identifies issues based on this feedback, it
`
`takes action to address them. Amazon uses this intelligence also to improve its proactive
`
`prevention controls.
`
`24.
`
`In 2017, Amazon launched the Amazon Brand Registry, a free service to any
`
`rights owner with a government-registered trademark, regardless of the brand’s relationship
`
`with Amazon. Brand Registry delivers automated brand protections that use machine learning
`
`to predict infringement and proactively protect brands’ IP. Brand Registry also provides a
`
`powerful Report a Violation Tool that allows brands to search for and accurately report
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 7
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 8 of 23
`
`
`
`
`potentially infringing products using state‐of-the‐art image search technology. More than
`
`350,000 brands, including Ferragamo, are enrolled in Brand Registry, and those brands are
`
`finding and reporting 99% fewer suspected infringements since joining Brand Registry.
`
`25.
`
`In 2018, Amazon launched Transparency, a product serialization service that
`
`effectively eliminates counterfeits for enrolled products. Brands enrolled in Transparency can
`
`apply a unique 2D code to every unit they manufacture, which allows Amazon, other retailers,
`
`law enforcement, and customers to determine the authenticity of any Transparency-enabled
`
`product, regardless of where the product was purchased. Since Transparency’s launch in 2018,
`
`over 10,000 brands have enrolled, protecting brands and customers from counterfeits being sold
`
`in the Amazon store.
`
`26.
`
`In 2019, Amazon launched Amazon Project Zero, a program to empower brands
`
`to help Amazon drive counterfeits to zero. Amazon Project Zero introduced a novel self-
`
`service counterfeit removal tool that enables brands to remove counterfeit listings directly from
`
`the Amazon store. This enables brands to take down counterfeit product offerings on their own
`
`within minutes. Since the program launched in 2019, over 10,000 brands have enrolled.
`
`27.
`
`In addition to these measures, Amazon actively cooperates with rights owners
`
`and law enforcement to identify and prosecute bad actors suspected of engaging in illegal
`
`activity. Lawsuits, like this one, are integral components of Amazon’s efforts to combat
`
`counterfeits.
`
`B.
`
`28.
`
`Ferragamo and Its Anti-Counterfeiting Efforts
`
`Over the years Ferragamo has implemented a series of offline and online anti-
`
`counterfeiting measures to protect its customers and the value of its brand. Its online
`
`monitoring activities have enabled it to achieve significant results. More than 100,000 listings
`
`of counterfeited products are identified, blocked and removed from online stores and
`
`marketplaces on an annual basis. Ferragamo also carries out actions offline through court, out-
`
`of-court, administrative and criminal proceedings and cooperates with enforcement authorities
`
`all over the world.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 8
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 9 of 23
`
`
`
`
`29.
`
`Ferragamo is currently enrolled in Amazon Brand Registry and Project Zero.
`
`Ferragamo began actively using the tools and protections provided by these programs after and
`
`in response to the counterfeiting activity described in this Complaint.
`
`C.
`
`Defendants Created Amazon Selling Accounts and Agreed Not to Sell
`Counterfeit Goods
`
`30.
`
`Defendants controlled and operated the two Amazon Selling Accounts detailed
`
`in section D below through which they sought to advertise, market, sell, and distribute
`
`counterfeit Ferragamo products. In connection with these Selling Accounts, Defendants
`
`provided names, email addresses, and banking information for each account.
`
`31.
`
`Between February and November of 2020, Defendants established two Amazon
`
`Selling Accounts through which they sought to advertise, market, sell, and distribute
`
`counterfeit Ferragamo products. When Defendants opened these two accounts, they provided
`
`names, addresses, and banking information for each Account. Plaintiffs’ investigations have
`
`revealed that the address for one account does not exist; namely, there is no property or
`
`business associated with the given address. Furthermore, on information and belief, the names
`
`provided by Defendants for the two Accounts are fictitious.
`
`32.
`
`To become a third-party seller in the Amazon store, sellers are required to agree
`
`to the BSA, which governs the applicant’s access to and use of Amazon’s services and states
`
`Amazon’s rules for selling through the website. By entering into the BSA, each seller
`
`represents and warrants that it “will comply with all applicable laws in [the] performance of
`
`[its] obligations and exercise of [its] rights” under the BSA. A true and correct copy of the
`
`applicable version of the BSA, namely, the version when Defendants last used Amazon’s
`
`Services, is attached as Exhibit B.
`
`33.
`
`The BSA incorporates, and sellers therefore agree to be bound by, Amazon’s
`
`Anti-Counterfeiting Policy, the applicable version of which is attached as Exhibit C. The
`
`Anti-Counterfeiting Policy expressly prohibits the sale of counterfeit goods in the Amazon
`
`store:
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 9
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 10 of 23
`
` The sale of counterfeit products is strictly prohibited.
`
` You may not sell any products that are not legal for sale, such
`as products that have been illegally replicated, reproduced, or
`manufactured[.]
`
` You must provide records about the authenticity of your
`products if Amazon requests that documentation[.]
`
`Failure to abide by this policy may result in loss of selling
`privileges, funds being withheld, destruction of inventory in our
`fulfilment centers, and other legal consequences.
`
`
`
`
`Id.
`
`34.
`
`Amazon’s Anti-Counterfeiting Policy further describes Amazon’s commitment
`
`to preventing the sale and distribution of counterfeit goods in the Amazon store together with
`
`the consequences of doing so:
`
` Sell Only Authentic and Legal Products. It is your
`responsibility to source, sell, and fulfill only authentic products
`that are legal for sale. Examples of prohibited products include:
`
`o Bootlegs, fakes, or pirated copies of products or content
`
`o Products that have been illegally replicated, reproduced, or
`manufactured
`
`o Products that infringe another party’s intellectual property
`rights
`
` Maintain and Provide Inventory Records. Amazon may request
`that you provide documentation (such as invoices) showing the
`authenticity of your products or your authorization to list them
`for sale. You may remove pricing information from these
`documents, but providing documents that have been edited in
`any other way or that are misleading is a violation of this
`policy and will lead to enforcement against your account.
`
` Consequences of Selling Inauthentic Products. If you sell
`inauthentic products, we may immediately suspend or
`terminate your Amazon selling account (and any related
`accounts), destroy any inauthentic products in our fulfillment
`centers at your expense, and/or withhold payments to you.
`
` Amazon Takes Action to Protect Customers and Rights
`Owners. Amazon also works with manufacturers, rights
`holders, content owners, vendors, and sellers to improve the
`ways we detect and prevent inauthentic products from reaching
`our customers. As a result of our detection and enforcement
`activities, Amazon may:
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 10
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 11 of 23
`
`o Remove suspect listings.
`
`o Take legal action against parties who knowingly violate
`this policy and harm our customers. In addition to criminal
`fines and imprisonment, sellers and suppliers of inauthentic
`products may face civil penalties including the loss of any
`amounts received from the sale of inauthentic products, the
`damage or harm sustained by the rights holders, statutory
`and other damages, and attorney’s fees.
`
` Reporting Inauthentic Products. We stand behind the products
`sold on our site with our A-to-z Guarantee, and we encourage
`rights owners who have product authenticity concerns to notify
`us. We will promptly investigate and take all appropriate
`actions to protect customers, sellers, and rights holders. You
`may view counterfeit complaints on the Account Health page
`in Seller Central.
`
`
`
`
`Id.
`
`35. When they registered as third-party sellers in the Amazon store, and established
`
`their Selling Accounts, Defendants agreed not to advertise, market, offer, sell or distribute
`
`counterfeit products.
`
`D.
`
`36.
`
`Test Purchases from Defendants’ Selling Accounts
`
`Defendants advertised, marketed, offered, and sold Ferragamo-branded products
`
`in the Amazon store. Amazon has conducted multiple test purchases from the Defendants’
`
`Selling Accounts and Ferragamo has determined that the test-purchased products are
`
`counterfeit and each bears a counterfeit Ferragamo registered trademark.
`
`Selling Account #1 – zhaoha032ojun
`
`37.
`
`At all times described herein, Selling Account zhaoha032ojun was controlled
`
`and operated by Defendant Zhao Hao Jun and, on information and belief, other parties, known
`
`and unknown.
`
`38.
`
`On October 16, 2020, Amazon conducted three test purchases from Selling
`
`Account zhaoha0320jun for what appeared to be Ferragamo-branded belts complete with
`
`Ferragamo marks and design elements. The offer listing pages, however, omitted any mention
`
`of the Ferragamo word mark in the product descriptions in an apparent effort to evade
`
`Amazon’s anti-counterfeiting detection tools:
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 11
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 12 of 23
`
`Product photos from zhaoha032ojun seller page
`listings
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`39.
`
`Defendants shipped product that bore the Ferragamo Trademarks and other
`
`indications of its brand. Ferragamo compared the products to its authentic products and
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 12
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 13 of 23
`
`
`
`
`determined there were distinct differences in construction and details. A depiction comparing
`
`the counterfeit product supplied by Defendants with an authentic version of the product
`
`follows:
`
`
`Images of zhaoha032ojun counterfeit product containing
`Ferragamo word mark
`
`Images of genuine Ferragamo product
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Selling Account # 2 – cangzhoushuofengdianzikejiZZX
`
`40.
`
`At all times described herein, Selling Account cangzhoushuofengdianzikejiZZX
`
`was controlled and operated by Defendant cangzhoushuofengdianzikejiyouxiangongsi and, on
`
`information and belief, other parties, known and unknown.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 13
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 14 of 23
`
`
`
`
`41.
`
`On October 16, 2020, Amazon conducted three test purchases from Selling
`
`Account cangzhoushuofengdianzikejiZZX for what appeared to be Ferragamo-designed belts
`
`complete with Ferragamo marks and design elements. The offer listing pages, however,
`
`omitted any mention of the Ferragamo word mark in the product descriptions in an apparent
`
`effort to evade Amazon’s anti-counterfeiting detection tools:
`
`Product photos from
`cangzhoushuofengdianzikejiZZX seller page listings
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 14
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 15 of 23
`
`
`
`
`42.
`
`Defendants shipped product that bore the Ferragamo Trademarks and other
`
`indications of its brand. Ferragamo compared the products to its authentic products and
`
`determined there were distinct differences in construction and details. A depiction comparing
`
`the counterfeit product supplied by Defendants with an authentic version of the product
`
`follows:
`
`
`Images of cangzhoushuofengdianzikejiZZX counterfeit
`product containing Ferragamo word mark
`
`
`
` Images of genuine Ferragamo product
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`E.
`
`43.
`
`Defendants’ Coordinated Sale of Counterfeit Ferragamo Products
`
`On information and belief, Defendants operated in concert with one another in
`
`their counterfeiting activities including, in some instances, sourcing their counterfeits from the
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 15
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 16 of 23
`
`
`
`
`same supplier and using common logistics companies to illegally import the counterfeits into
`
`and within the United States.
`
`44.
`
`The Selling Accounts have various common characteristics that make it
`
`probable that the accounts are being operated by one or more of the Defendants acting in
`
`concert. These common characteristics include 1) the identical tactic of using images of the
`
`Ferragamo products without using the Ferragamo word mark in the description in the offer
`
`listing page to evade Amazon’s Automated Brand Protection algorithm; 2) the same pricing for
`
`all products; 3) similarity of counterfeit product; 4) using identical packaging for the
`
`Ferragamo counterfeit products; and 5) all counterfeit products shipped from the same shipper
`
`at the same address and same telephone number.
`
`F.
`
`45.
`
`Amazon and Ferragamo Shut Down Defendants’ Accounts
`
`By selling counterfeit Ferragamo products, Defendants falsely represented to
`
`Amazon and its customers that the products Defendants sold were genuine products made by
`
`Ferragamo. Defendants also knowingly and willfully used Ferragamo’s IP in connection with
`
`the advertisement, marketing, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of counterfeit Ferragamo
`
`products.
`
`46.
`
`At all times, Defendants knew they were prohibited from violating third-party IP
`
`rights or any applicable laws while selling products in the Amazon store. Defendants have
`
`deceived Amazon’s customers and Amazon, infringed and misused the IP rights of Ferragamo,
`
`harmed the integrity of and customer trust in the Amazon store, and tarnished Amazon’s and
`
`Ferragamo’s brands.
`
`47.
`
`Amazon, after receiving notice from Ferragamo, verified Defendants’ unlawful
`
`sale of counterfeit Ferragamo products and promptly blocked Defendants’ Selling Accounts. In
`
`doing so, Amazon exercised its rights under the BSA to protect customers and the reputations
`
`of Amazon and Ferragamo.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF - 16
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1640
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00171 Document 1 Filed 02/11/21 Page 17 of 23
`
`
`
`
`V.
`
`CLAIMS
`
`FIRST CLAIM
`(by Ferragamo against all Defendants)
`Trademark Infringement – 15 U.S.C. § 1114
`
`48.
`
`Plaintiff Ferragamo incorporates by reference the allegations of the preceding
`
`paragraphs as though set forth herein.
`
`49.
`
`Defendants’ activities constitute infringement of the Ferragamo Trademarks as
`
`described in the paragraphs above.
`
`50.
`
`Ferragamo advertises, markets, offers, and sells its products using the
`
`Ferragamo Trademarks described above and uses those trademarks to distinguish its products
`
`from the products and related items of others in the same or related fields.
`
`51.
`
`Because of Ferragamo’s long, continuous, and exclusive use of the Ferragamo
`
`Trademarks identified in this Complaint, the trademarks have come to mean, and are
`
`understood by customers and the public to signify, products from Ferragamo.
`
`52.
`
`Defendants unlawfully advertised, marketed, offered, and sold products bearing
`
`counterfeit versions of the Ferragamo Trademarks with the intent and likelihood of causing
`
`customer confusion, mistake, and deception as to the products’ source, origin, and authenticity.
`
`Specifically, Def

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket