throbber
1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 1 of 17
`
`The Honorable
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
`
`TIMOTHY SLYNE and TAI SLYNE,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
` vs.
`
`Case No.
`
`ATHIRA PHARMA, INC.; LEEN KAWAS,
`Ph.D.; GLENNA MILESON; TADATAKA
`YAMADA, M.D.; JOSEPH EDELMAN;
`JOHN M. FLUKE, JR.; JAMES A.
`JOHNSON; GOLDMAN SACHS & CO.
`LLC; JEFFERIES LLC; STIFEL, NICOLAUS
`& COMPANY, INCORPORATED; and JMP
`SECURITIES LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`COMPLAINT—CLASS ACTION
`
`FOR VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 11 and
`15 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Plaintiffs Timothy Slyne and Tai Slyne, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
`situated, allege the following based upon personal knowledge as to their own acts and upon
`information and belief as to all other matters in reliance upon the investigation conducted by and
`through counsel, which included, among other things, a review of filings by Athira Pharma, Inc.,
`(“Athira” or the “Company”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”),
`publicly available news and security analyst reports concerning Athira and the historic market
`
`COMPLAINT - 1
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 2 of 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`prices of Athira common stock. Plaintiffs believe substantial additional evidentiary support exists
`for the allegations set forth herein and can be obtained after reasonable opportunity for discovery.
`I.
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`Plaintiffs bring this securities class action on behalf of all persons who purchased
`1.
`common stock of Athira in or traceable to the Company’s registration statement issued in
`connection with the Company’s September 2020 initial public offering priced at $17.00 per share
`(the “IPO”), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a –
`77bbbb (the “Securities Act”) against Athira, certain of Athira’s officers and directors, and the
`underwriters of the IPO.
`2.
`Athira describes itself as a late clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused
`on developing potential treatments for patients with Alzheimer’s disease (“AD”), Parkinson’s
`disease dementia (“PDD”) and other central nervous system disorders.
`3.
`The Company’s lead product candidate, ATH-1017, is in clinical development for
`the potential treatment of AD and PDD. The Company’s remaining product candidates, including
`ATH-1018 and ATH-1019, are in nonclinical development. The Company acknowledged that it is
`impossible to predict when or if any of Athira’s product candidates will prove to be effective and
`safe in humans or will receive regulatory approval.
`4.
`As of the IPO, the Company had not generated any revenue from product sales and
`the Company’s product candidates required substantial additional investment before any product
`could provide the Company with any revenue.
`5.
`On August 26, 2020, the Defendants caused Athira to file a Form S-1 for
`registration of securities under the Securities Act. The Athira Form S-1 was thereafter amended
`on September 8, 14 and 17, 2020. The Registration Statement became effective September 17,
`2020 at 4:00 P.M.
`6.
`On June 17, 2021, Athira disclosed in a press release that Athira placed the
`Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and Board member, Leen Kawas, on leave pending
`
`COMPLAINT - 2
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 3 of 17
`
`a review of actions stemming from Kawas’ doctoral research at Washington State University and
`that Chief Operating Officer, Dr. Mark Litton, would assume day-to-day
`leadership
`responsibilities for the Company. The press release further stated that Athira formed an
`independent special committee of the Board to undertake the review and that the Company did not
`intend to comment further until the special committee completed its review.
`7.
`According to the scientific publication STAT, Dr. Kawas was placed on leave amid
`allegations of altered images in her research papers while she was a Ph.D. student at Washington
`State University. STAT reported on June 17, 2021, that the investigation involves alleged altered
`images in four separate papers on which Dr. Kawas was lead author. Images of Western blots,
`used to determine the presence of specific proteins in biological samples, look as though they have
`been altered from their original state according to two image experts who spoke with STAT.
`8.
`On June 18, 2021, Dow Jones reported that Washington State University said it has
`undertaken a review of claims of potential research misconduct involving research conducted by
`Kawas. Washington State said it is conducting its inquiry into the issue in accordance with
`executive policy that governs how the institution responds to allegations of research misconduct.
`9.
`On June 20, 2021, Puget Sound Business Journal reported that Elisabeth Bik, an
`independent consultant with a doctorate in microbiology, who specializes in finding potential
`errors in images from published research, found that the same image results seem to be used in
`different experiments in Kawas' research. At least one of them is wrong,” Bik said. “Maybe they
`ran the experiment and the results were not as expected, or maybe they didn't run the experiment
`at all.”
`
`On June 18, 2021, Athira shares plummeted 39% to $11.15, well below the $17.00
`10.
`IPO price, after the Company disclosed that its Board decided to place Chief Executive Kawas on
`leave pending a review of actions stemming from research Dr. Kawas conducted while at
`Washington State University.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT - 3
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 4 of 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`As a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company yet to bring a product to market,
`11.
`trust in Athira management is imperative.
`12.
`None of the problematic issues with Kawas’ research were disclosed in the Athira
`Registration Statement or Prospectus.
`II.
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`The claims asserted herein arise under and pursuant to §§ 11 and 15 of the Securities
`13.
`Act [15 U.S.C. §§77k, 77l(a)(2) and 77o].
`14.
`This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to § 22 of the Securities Act,
`[15 U.S.C. §77v], and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
`15.
`Venue is properly laid in this District pursuant to § 22 of the Securities Act, and 28
`U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c). The acts and conduct complained of herein occurred in substantial part
`in this District.
`16.
`In connection with the acts and conduct alleged in this Complaint, Defendants,
`directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including the
`mails and telephonic communications and the facilities of the NASDAQ.
`III.
`PARTIES
`
`A.
`
`The Plaintiffs
`17.
`Plaintiff Timothy Slyne purchased Athira common stock in or traceable to the IPO
`as set forth in his certification attached hereto as Exhibit A and was damaged thereby.
`18.
` Plaintiff Tai Slyne purchased Athira common stock in or traceable to the IPO as
`set forth in her certification attached hereto as Exhibit B and was damaged thereby.
`B.
`The Company Defendant
`19.
`Defendant Athira Pharma, Inc. is incorporated under the law of the state of
`Delaware and maintains its principal executive office at 18706 North Creek Parkway, Suite 104,
`Bothell Washington 98011. After its IPO, shares of Athira common stock trade on the Nasdaq
`Global Select Market under the trading symbol “ATHA.”
`
`COMPLAINT - 4
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 5 of 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`C.
`
`The Director and Officer Defendants
`20.
`Defendant Leen Kawas, Ph.D. (“Kawas”) has served as the Company’s chief
`executive officer and as a member of its board of directors since January 2014. Prior to 2014,
`Kawas served as the Company’s vice president. According to Athira’s Registration Statement,
`Kawas earned a Ph.D. in molecular pharmacology from Washington State University in 2011 and
`a pharmacy degree from the University of Jordan in 2008.
`21.
`Defendant Glenna Mileson (“Mileson”) has served as the Company’s chief
`financial officer since October 2015. Before she served as the Company’s chief financial officer,
`Mileson provided outsourced financial management services to Athira as a partner at B2B CFO
`Partners LLC.
`Defendant Tadataka Yamada, M.D., (“Yamada”) has served on the Company’s
`22.
`board of directors since June 2019 and as the chair of the Company’s board of directors since
`January 2020. Yamada is also a venture partner at Frazier Healthcare and co-founder of, and
`currently serves on the board of directors for, Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Passage Bio, Scout Bio,
`and Outpost Medicine. Yamada also serves on the board of directors of Agilent Technologies, Inc.,
`as board of directors’ chair at the Clinton Health Access Initiative and is a member of the Council
`of the National Academy of Medicine. Yamada is also a fellow of the Imperial College of
`Medicine, a master of the American College of Physicians, a fellow of the Royal College of
`Physicians, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a past-president of the
`American Gastroenterological Association and the Association of American Physicians.
`Previously, Yamada held executive leadership roles at Takeda Pharmaceuticals, the Bill and
`Melinda Gates Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline, and at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
`Yamada received his M.D. from New York University School of Medicine in 1971.
`23.
`Defendant Joseph Edelman (“Edelman”) has served on the Company’s board of
`directors since May 2020. Edelman is founder, chief executive officer, and portfolio manager of
`Perceptive Advisors. Prior to founding Perceptive Advisors, Edelman was a senior analyst at Aries
`
`COMPLAINT - 5
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 6 of 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`Fund, a Paramount Capital Asset Management biotechnology hedge fund, from 1994 through
`1998. Prior to that position, Edelman was a senior biotechnology analyst at Prudential Securities
`from 1990 to 1994. Edelman started his career in the healthcare sector of the securities industry as
`a biotechnology analyst at Labe, Simpson from 1987 to 1990. Mr. Edelman earned an M.B.A.
`from New York University in 1986 and a B.A., magna cum laude, in psychology from the
`University of California San Diego in 1978.
`24.
`Defendant John M. Fluke, Jr. (“Fluke”) has served on the Company’s board of
`directors since December 2014. Fluke is chairman of Fluke Capital Management, L.P., which he
`founded in 1976, and was chairman and chief executive officer of the John Fluke Manufacturing
`Co. until 1990. Fluke previously served on the boards of PACCAR Inc., CellCyte Genetics
`Corporation, Cell Therapeutics, Primus International, and American Seafoods Group. Fluke is a
`current trustee of the Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce (formerly serving as its chairman)
`and previously served as chairman of the Washington State China Relations Council and a trustee
`emeritus of the Museum of Flight. Fluke also previously served as chairman of the Washington
`Technology Center at the University of Washington, an organization responsible for managing
`technology transfers from public universities in Washington state to the private sector for
`commercialization. Fluke earned an M.S. in electrical engineering from Stanford University in
`1966 and a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 1964.
`25.
`Defendant James A. Johnson (“Johnson”) has served on the Company’s board of
`directors since August 2020. Johnson previously served as the chief financial officer of Nohla
`Therapeutics, a cell therapy company. Prior to Nohla, Johnson served for five years as the chief
`financial officer of NanoString Technologies, a publicly held provider of life science tools for
`translational research and molecular diagnostics. During his tenure as chief financial officer at
`NanoString, Johnson oversaw strategic and corporate finance activities from private stage through
`the company’s initial public offering and additional rounds of financing, marking the third initial
`public offering in his career as a chief financial officer. Prior to joining NanoString, Johnson served
`
`COMPLAINT - 6
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 7 of 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`as chief financial officer of Relypsa, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. Prior to
`Relypsa, Johnson served for nearly 10 years as chief financial officer of ZymoGenetics, Inc., until
`the company was acquired by Bristol-Myers Squibb in October 2010. Previously, Johnson served
`for seven years as chief financial officer of Targeted Genetics Corporation (now Armata
`Pharmaceuticals) and as Vice President of Finance at Immunex Corporation during its evolution
`from product development to commercial operations. Johnson received a B.A. in business
`administration from the University of Washington in 1979.
`26.
`Defendants Kawas, Mileson, Yamada, Edelman, Fluke, and Johnson are signers of
`the Registration Statement pursuant to the Securities Act and are referred to collectively as the
`Director and Officer Defendants.
`D.
`The Underwriter Defendants
`27.
`Defendant Goldman Sachs & Co. L.L.C. (“Goldman”) maintains its principal
`executive offices at 200 West Street New York, NY 10282 and offers investment banking,
`securities, asset management, capital market, valuation, bonds, funds, financial analysis,
`investment strategies, and advisory services. Defendant Goldman agreed to purchase 5,100,000
`shares in the IPO. Defendant Goldman agreed to purchase 5,100,00 shares in the IPO.
`28.
`Defendant Jefferies L.L.C. (“Jefferies”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Jefferies
`Group L.L.C. Jefferies provides investment banking services including securities underwriting.
`Jefferies maintains its principal executive offices at 520 Madison Avenue, 11th Floor, New York,
`NY 10022. Defendant Jeffries agreed to purchase 3,960,000 shares in the IPO.
`29.
`Defendant Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (“Stifel”) is a wholly owned
`subsidiary of Stifel Financial Corp. and maintains its principal executive offices at 501 N
`Broadway, Saint Louis, MO, 63102. Stifel provides services such as investment banking and
`securities underwriting. Defendant Stifel agreed to purchase 1,980,000 shares in the IPO.
`30.
`Defendant JMP Securities L.L.C (“JMP”) is a wholly owned, indirect subsidiary of
`JMP Group L.L.C. and maintains its principal executive offices at 600 Montgomery Street, Suite
`
`COMPLAINT - 7
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 8 of 17
`
`1100, San Francisco 94111. JMP is a middle-market investment bank and provides an array of
`financial services including securities underwriting. Defendant JMP agreed to purchase 960,000
`shares in the IPO.
`31.
`Goldman, Jefferies, Stifel and JMP are referred to collectively as the Underwriter
`Defendants. The Underwriter Defendants’ failure to conduct adequate due diligence in connection
`with the IPO and the preparation of the Registration Statement was a substantial factor leading to
`the harm complained of herein.
`
`THE IPO
`IV.
`In September 2020, Athira completed an initial public offering of its common stock.
`32.
`As part of the IPO, Athira issued and sold 12,000,000 shares of its common stock at a public
`offering price of $17.00 per share. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $186.4
`million from the IPO, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $14.3 million
`and offering costs of approximately $3.3 million. In October 2020, Athira sold an additional
`1,397,712 shares of common stock to the Underwriter Defendants upon partial exercise of the
`underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares at the initial public offering price of $17.00 per
`share, less underwriting discounts and commissions, and offering costs of approximately $1.7
`million resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $22.1 million.
`V.
`SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS
`On June 17, 2021, after the close of the markets, the Company announced via Globe
`33.
`Newswire, that Athira’s President and CEO, Dr. Leen Kawas, would be placed on temporary leave
`and her executive duties would be assumed by Chief Operating Office Dr. Mark Litton. The reason
`given by the Company for this rash move was to provide time for an “independent” Special
`Committee of the Board to undertake a review of allegations related to the accuracy and
`truthfulness of Dr. Kawas’ reporting on both her research performed in connection with her PhD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT - 8
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 9 of 17
`
`dissertation that she presented, as well as related to other academic papers that she authored or co-
`authored, while at Washington State University.1
`34.
`According to an article dated June 17, 2021 in the scientific news publication STAT,
`posted after the above announcement, the allegations against Dr. Kawas center around “altered
`images in four separate papers” on which Dr. Kawas was the lead author: “Images of Western
`blots, used to determine the presence of specific proteins in biological samples, look as though
`they’ve been altered from their original state, according to two image experts who spoke with
`STAT.” Olivia Goldhill, Athira Pharma CEO Placed on Leave Amid Allegations of Altered Images
`in Her Research Papers, STAT (June 17, 2021) (attached as Exhibit C)
`35.
`As early as June of 2016, a comment had been posted on the academic article
`website PubPeer regarding one of Kawas’s academic papers. The comment questions an anomaly
`in an image related to Kawas’ results which appears to have been modified:2
`
`1 Press Release, Athira Pharma, Athira Pharma Chief Operating Officer, Mark Litton, Assumes Day-to-Day
`Leadership Responsibilities of Company (June 17, 2021), https://www.globenewswire.com/news-
`release/2021/06/17/2249351/0/en/Athira-Pharma-Chief-Operating-Officer-Mark-Litton-Assumes-Day-to-Day-
`Leadership-Responsibilities-of-Company.html
`2 PubPeer, Comment #1 Peer 1, https://pubpeer.com/publications/22129598 (last visited June 25, 2021)
`
`COMPLAINT - 9
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 10 of 17
`
`A subsequent commentor agreed, that the image appears to have been modified and
`36.
`pointed out that the image was from Dr. Kawas’ PhD dissertation.
`37.
`Subsequently, as found on PubPeer3, Dr. Elisabeth Bik, an independent consultant
`who specializes in finding potential errors in images from published research, also addressed Dr.
`Kawas’ work. Dr. Bik pointed out another anomalous image that appears to be a result of bad
`experimentation practice:
`
`In an interview with the Puget Sound Business Journal following Dr. Kawas’s
`38.
`suspension, Dr. Bik noted other problematic practices employed by Dr. Kawas, including using
`the same image results for different experiments. “At least one of them is wrong… Maybe they
`
`3 Id. at Comment #4
`
`COMPLAINT - 10
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 11 of 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`ran the experiment and the results were not as expected, or maybe they didn’t run the experiment
`at all.”4
`
`On June 18, 2021, in an article in online news publication “The Fly:” “Stifel analyst
`39.
`Paul Matteis said the news ‘comes as a big surprise’ and that he doesn't ‘really know how to process
`this development,’ which is an ‘impossible situation to really vet.’ While he is refraining from
`drawing any firm conclusions for now and has a Buy rating on Athira shares, Matteis
`acknowledges that the investigation ‘could have clear negative implications’ for how he and
`investors view ATH-1017 and/or management credibility.”5
`40.
`Despite the above disclosures, only coming to light in the investor community now,
`Defendant Kawas is touted repeatedly in the Registration Statement, as “our founder and chief
`executive officer, [who] has been essential in creating our innovating translational development
`strategy.” (See Athira Pharma, Inc., Registration Statement 8 (Form S-1/A) (Sept. 17, 2020). and
`further “We believe Dr. Kawas’s scientific and professional training, her instrumental role in
`building Athira Pharma, Inc., and her extensive understanding of our business, operations and
`strategy qualify her to serve on our board of directors.” Id at page 152.
`41.
`The above statements regarding Dr. Kawas casting her only in a positive light, are
`materially false and misleading, Most significantly, the Defendants in the Registration Statement
`completely conceal and materially omit any mention of the truth, namely that Dr. Kawas repeatedly
`falsified images in her scientific research or at best had been accused of falsifying her research as
`early as June 2016. In fact, the Registration Statement and Prospectus lists “risk factors” for
`investors in a substantial section containing over thirty pages of risks to business success and
`investor revenue, but omits the critical risk stemming from Dr. Kawas’s alleged falsifications. See
`Registration Statement & Prospectus at p.17–75.
`
`4 Rick Morgan, Questions Around Athira CEO’s Research Began to Surface in 2016, Puget Sound Business Journal
`(June 20, 2021), https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2021/06/20/athira-ceo-2016-research.html
`5 The Fly, Athira Pharma CEO Leave Situation ‘Impossible to Really Vet,’ Says Stifel (June 18, 2021),
`https://thefly.com/landingPageNews.php?id=3322878&headline=ATHA-Athira-Pharma-CEO-leave-situation-
`impossible-to-really-vet-says-Stifel (last visited June 25, 2021)
`
`COMPLAINT - 11
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 12 of 17
`
`As stated in the STAT article, “the papers [containing the altered images] are
`42.
`foundational to Athira’s efforts to treat Alzheimer’s and are cited in a patent licensed by Athira.
`Kawas, who co-founded Athira, is described as a co-inventor in the patent.” Further, according to
`STAT, “Kawas’ doctoral work laid the biological groundwork that Athira continues to use in its
`approach to treating Alzheimer’s, neuroscientist George Perry of the University of Texas at San
`Antonio, told STAT: ‘They are foundational basic science.’” See Goldhill, supra.
`43. Washington State University, where Kawas conducted her research, has begun an
`inquiry into the images. Spokesperson Phil Weiler, in an email to STAT prior to the publication of
`the article stated, “Washington State University takes claims of research misconduct very
`seriously.” Washington State University owns the intellectual property for discoveries that are
`based on research conducted at the university. The university therefore owns equity in the company
`and stands to profit from Athira’s work. Id.
`44.
`Further, according to the STAT article, several Alzheimer’s experts have stated that
`the allegedly altered images call into question the validity of the entire studies Dr. Kawas
`conducted at Washington State University. Dr. Perry, quoted above in paragraph 42, said that if
`the Western blots are inaccurate, then the whole study must be redone. “If there is a question about
`key data, all must be questioned,” he said. Id.
`45.
`The defendants’ omission to disclose the existence of the facts alleged above
`pertaining to Dr. Kawas rendered the Registration Statement Prospectus materially false and
`misleading.
`
`CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
`VI.
`Plaintiffs bring this action as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
`46.
`Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3) on behalf of the Class defined as:
`
`All persons or entities who purchased Athira common stock pursuant or traceable
`to the IPO and were damaged thereby.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT - 12
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 13 of 17
`
`Excluded from the Class are defendants herein, members of the immediate families of each of the
`defendants, any person, firm, trust, corporation, officer, director, or other individual or entity in
`which any defendant has a controlling interest or which is related to or affiliated with any
`defendant, and the legal representatives, agents, affiliates, heirs, successors-in-interest or assigns
`of any such excluded party.
`47.
`The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder of all members is
`impracticable. Athira stock was extensively traded following the September IPO. The precise
`number of Class members is unknown to plaintiffs at this time but upon information and belief
`number at least one hundred. In addition, the names and addresses of the Class members can be
`ascertained from the books and records of Athira or its transfer agent. Notice can be provided to
`such record owners by a combination of published notice and first-class mail, using techniques
`and a form of notice similar to those customarily used in class actions arising under the federal
`securities laws.
`48.
`Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of the
`members of the Class. Plaintiffs have retained competent counsel experienced in class action
`litigation under the federal securities laws to further ensure such protection and intend to prosecute
`this action vigorously.
`49.
`Plaintiffs’ claims are typical of the claims of the other members of the Class
`because plaintiffs’ and all the Class members’ damages arise from and were caused by the same
`false and misleading representations made by or chargeable to defendants. Plaintiffs do not have
`any interests antagonistic to, or in conflict with, the Class.
`50.
`A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient
`adjudication of this controversy. Since the damages suffered by individual Class members may be
`relatively small, the expense and burden of individual litigation make it virtually impossible for
`the Class members to seek redress for the wrongful conduct alleged. Plaintiffs know of no
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT - 13
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 14 of 17
`
`difficulty that will be encountered in the management of this litigation that would preclude its
`maintenance as a class action.
`51.
`Common questions of law and fact exist as to all members of the Class and
`predominate over any questions solely affecting individual members of the Class. Among the
`questions of law and fact common to the Class are:
`a)
`whether the federal securities laws were violated by defendants’ acts as
`alleged herein;
`whether statements made by defendants in the prospectus prior to Athira’s
`b)
`public offerings of stock were materially false and misleading;
`c)
`whether the price of Athira common stock was artificially inflated as a result
`of the false and misleading statements; and
`d)
`the extent of injuries sustained by members of the Class and the appropriate
`measure of damages.
`
`FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`
`For Violation of § 11 of the Securities Act Against the Office and Director Defendants and
`the Underwriter Defendants
`
`Plaintiffs incorporates the allegations set forth in ¶¶ 1–51above as though fully set
`52.
`forth herein. For purposes of this Claim, plaintiffs exclude allegations that could be construed as
`alleging fraud or intentional misconduct, as this Claim is based solely on claims of strict liability
`and/or negligence.
`53.
`This Claim is brought pursuant to § 11 of the 1933 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77k, against
`all defendants.
`54.
`The Athira Registration Statement was materially false and misleading in that it
`omitted to state material facts required to be stated therein, contained untrue statements of material
`facts, and/or omitted to state facts necessary to make the statements made therein not misleading.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT - 14
`No.
`
`KELLER ROH RBAC K L.L.P.
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
`Seattle, WA 98101-3052
`T E L E P H O N E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0
`F A C S I M I L E : ( 2 0 6 ) 6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00864 Document 1 Filed 06/25/21 Page 15 of 17
`
`The Defendants named herein owed to the Class members who acquired Athira
`55.
`common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the public offerings the duty to make a reasonable and
`diligent investigation of the statements contained in the Registration Statement. The defendants
`named herein did not conduct a reasonable investigation and did not possess reasonable grounds
`for believing that the statements made in the prospectus were not false and/or misleading. Had
`defendants exercised reasonable care, they would have known of the material misstatements and
`omissions alleged herein.
`56.
`Plaintiffs and members of the Class acquired the securities issued in connection
`with the public offerings and/or traceable to the public offerings. As a direct and proximate result
`of the misrepresentations and/or omissions described in this claim, plaintiffs and members of the
`Class suffered substantial damage in connection with their acquisition of the securities described
`in herein. As a result of the conduct herein alleged, each defendant named above violated § 11 of
`the 1933 Ac

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket