`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`The Honorable Kymberly K. Evanson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`No. 2:22-cv-01599-KKE
`
`ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
`MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`STEVEN FLOYD, JOLENE FURDEK, and
`JONATHAN RYAN, on behalf of themselves
`and all others similarly situated,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
`corporation, and APPLE INC., a California
`corporation,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`.
`
`The parties filed a statement of discovery dispute that references and attaches material
`designated Confidential or Highly Confidential according to the parties’ protective order. Dkt.
`No. 182. Plaintiffs moved to provisionally file that statement and certain attachments under seal,
`and Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. responded to request that the Court maintain those documents
`under seal. Dkt. Nos. 181, 185. Plaintiffs also filed a redacted version of the statement on the
`public docket. Dkt. No. 183. Because the motion to seal complies with W.D. Wash. Local Civil
`Rule 5(g), the Court will grant it.
`The Court may seal judicial records when a party provides a compelling reason to keep
`information out of the public view. Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178
`(9th Cir. 2006). Amazon has met this burden by showing that the material referenced in or attached
`
`ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL – 1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 190 Filed 02/11/25 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`to the discovery dispute statement is confidential and competitively sensitive, and that there is no
`less restrictive alternative to maintaining that information under seal. The Court finds that the
`need to protect that information outweighs the public right of access to court records, particularly
`because the Court’s review of the redacted version of those documents on the public docket
`corroborates that Amazon’s request to seal is appropriately tailored. See Dkt. No. 186 ¶ 11.
`The motion to seal (Dkt. No. 181) is therefore GRANTED. The statement of discovery
`dispute and Exhibits B–G thereto (Dkt. No. 182) shall be maintained under seal.
`
`DATED: February 11, 2025.
`
`A
`
`Kymberly K. Evanson
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL – 2
`
`