throbber

`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 191 Filed 02/11/25 Page 1 of 5
`
`The Honorable Kymberly K. Evanson
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-01599-KKE
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER
`EXTENDING TIME
`
`
`
`
`STEVEN FLOYD, JOLENE FURDEK, and
`JONATHAN RYAN, on behalf of themselves
`and all others similarly situated,
`
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC. and APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendants.
`
`STIPULATED MOTION
`Plaintiffs Steven Floyd, Jolene Furdek, and Jonathan Ryan and Defendants Amazon.com,
`Inc. and Apple Inc. (together, “Defendants,” and collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by
`and through their counsel, stipulate as follows:
`Under the current schedule, fact discovery is set to close on February 26, 2025,
`1.
`with class certification briefing to follow. No case deadlines beyond class certification have
`been set.
`The Parties request a limited extension of the schedule to afford additional time to
`2.
`complete fact discovery.
`Good cause exists for a modest extension because the remaining fact and Rule
`3.
`30(b)(6) depositions could only be scheduled after the current fact discovery deadline in order to
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
`(CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01599-KKE) – 1
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`LAW OFFICES
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1610
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 191 Filed 02/11/25 Page 2 of 5
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document191
`Filed 02/11/25
`Page2of5
`
`adjust for and accommodate witnessavailability. The extension will also allow the parties time
`
`to complete third party discovery. The extension of fact discovery will require adjustmentof the
`
`dates for class certification briefing, but no other dates have yet beenset in this case.
`
`4.
`
`The Parties propose the following schedule:
`
`Fact discovery cutoff
`
`Date
`2/26/2025
`
`Date
`4/14/2025
`
`Class certification motion and supporting reports
`
`3/28/2025
`
`5/14/2025
`
`
`
`
`
`Class certification opposition and supporting reports|5/30/2025 8/14/2025
`
`Class certification reply and reply reports
`
`8/15/2025
`
`11/14/2025
`
`This schedule includes an adjustment of the cadence for class certification briefs because
`
`Defendants believe it will allow them sufficient time to depose any experts Plaintiffs may put
`
`forth in connection with their motion forclass certification.
`
`5.
`
`In order to streamline the remainderoffact discovery, Parties additionally
`
`stipulate and agree to the following limitations:
`
`a. For the Defendants’ deposition of Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs’ depositions of
`
`Defendants, including both fact depositions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(1) and corporate
`
`depositions pursuant to 30(b)(6), there will be a 7-hour maximum timelimit for each witness’s
`
`deposition, regardless of whether the witnessis sitting in their individual capacity, corporate
`
`capacity, or both at the same time.
`
`b. The parties havestipulated that Plaintiffs may take twelve fact witness
`
`depositions, which are the currently scheduled up-to five fact witnesses per side and one Rule
`
`30(b)(6) deposition per defendant.! The Defendants may designate an already scheduledfact
`
`witness deposition on someorall of the categories of the Rule 30(b)(6) notice. The Parties will
`
`' Defendantsreserve the right to challenge the appropriateness ofthe depositions currently
`noticed that have not yet occurred.
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
`(CASE NO.2:22-CV-01599-KKE) — 2
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`920FillAvomeSate 3300
`906.623MeA 98104-1610 fax
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 191 Filed 02/11/25 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`not serve additional notices of Rule 30(b)(1) or Rule 30(b)(6) depositions. This limitation
`applies only to party fact depositions and does not apply to expert depositions or third-party
`depositions. The Parties may only serve additional party fact depositions notices upon mutual
`agreement of the Parties or following a motion showing good cause.
`c. Each party has served the other Party (or Parties) with the written
`discovery (e.g., requests for production, interrogatories, requests for admissions) that they intend
`to serve at this time. However, there may be a need for limited written discovery to follow up on
`issues raised during the Parties’ 30(b)(6) deposition negotiations (such as serving requests for
`written discovery that previously were topics for 30(b)(6) depositions), for new issues that might
`arise during depositions, or for narrow “clean-up” discovery. Discovery should be served as
`soon as possible after a Party identifies a need in order to facilitate timely meeting and conferring
`on objections, the scope of responses, or the documents to be produced.
`d. The Parties shall complete any third-party discovery by the updated
`deadline to complete fact discovery.
`
`
`STIPULATED to and JOINTLY submitted this 7th day of February, 2025.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed
`Class
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:/s/ Steve W. Berman
`Steve W. Berman, WSBA #12536
`Barbara A. Mahoney, WSBA #31845
`HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO
`LLP
`1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Ph: (206) 623-7292; Fax: (206) 623-0594
`Email: steve@hbsslaw.com
`Email: barbaram@hbsslaw.com
`
`Ben Harrington (Pro Hac Vice)
`Benjamin Siegel (Pro Hac Vice)
`HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO
`LLP
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
`(CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01599-KKE) – 3
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`LAW OFFICES
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1610
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 191 Filed 02/11/25 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for AMAZON.COM, INC.
`
`By: /s/ John Goldmark
`John Goldmark, WSBA #40980
`MaryAnn Almeida, WSBA #49086
`DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, Washington, 98104
`Phone: (206) 622-3150
`Fax: (206) 757-7700
`Email: johngoldmark@dwt.com
`
` maryannalmeida@dwt.com
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Benjamin M. Mundel
`Mark D. Hopson (pro hac vice)
`Benjamin M. Mundel (pro hac vice)
`Jacquelyn E. Fradette (pro hac vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`1501 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Phone: (202) 736-8000
`Fax: (202) 736-8711
`Email: mhopson@sidley.com
` bmundel@sidley.com
` jfradette@sidley.com
`
`
`
`
`715 Hearst Ave, Suite 300
`Berkeley, CA 94710
`Ph: (510) 725-3000; Fax: (510) 725-3001
`Email: benh@hbsslaw.com
`Email: bens@hbsslaw.com
`
`
`
`Attorneys for APPLE INC.
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Mark S. Parris
`Mark S. Parris (WSBA No. 18370)
`mparris@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
`SUTCLIFFE LLP
`401 Union Street, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Telephone: +1 206 839 4300
`Facsimile: +1 206 839 4301
`
`Mark A. Perry (pro hac vice)
`WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP
`2001 M. Street NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`Phone: (202) 682-7000
`mark.perry@weil.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Brian G. Liegel (pro hac vice)
`WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP
`1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200
`Miami, FL 33131
`Phone: (305) 577-3180
`brian.liegel@weil.com
`
`Morgan D. MacBride (pro hac vice)
`WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Phone: (650) 802-3044
`morgan.macbride@weil.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
`(CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01599-KKE) – 4
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`LAW OFFICES
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98104-1610
`206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 191 Filed 02/11/25 Page 5 of 5
`5
`Page5of5
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document191_Filed 02/11/2
`
`woNO-—
`
`ORDER
`
`Theparties’ stipulated motion is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 189. The previous case schedule
`
`is VACATED(Dkt. No. 167), and the case shall now conform to the following schedule:
`
`Fact discovery cutoff
`
`=
`
`4/14/2025
`
`4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`Class certification opposition and supporting reports|8/14/2025 Class certification reply and reply reports
`
`Class certification motion and supporting reports
`
`5/14/2025
`
`11/14/2025
`
`Dated this 11th day of February, 2025.
`
`AepbGbCEns
`
`Kymberly K. Evanson
`United States District Judge
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
`(CASE NO.2:22-CV-01599-KKE) — 5
`
`Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
`Law OFFICES
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle. WA 98104-1610
`206.622.3150 main - 206.757.7700 fax
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket