`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`v.
`
`STEVEN FLOYD, et al.,
`
`
`
`
`AMAZON.COM INC., et al.,
`
`
`
`Defendant(s).
`
`CASE NO. C22-1599-KKE
`
`ORDER TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTS FOR
`IN CAMERA REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`The parties have notified the Court of their intent to reactivate motions previously
`
`terminated, specifically Plaintiffs’ counsel’s motion to withdraw representation of Plaintiff Steven
`
`Floyd, and Defendants’ motion for discovery sanctions against Floyd. Dkt. Nos. 197, 198. As the
`
`Court previously explained, an in camera review of privileged communications is necessary for
`
`the Court to resolve the reactivated motions. See Dkt. No. 196 at 7–8.
`
`Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ counsel is ORDERED to provide the Court copies of the following
`
`communications as described on the privilege log (Dkt. No. 174 at 5–17): entries 27, 28, 30, 31,
`
`32, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41–46, 55, 56, 58, 60, 61, 64, 65, 68, 71, 72, 75, 76, 79, 80. Plaintiffs’ counsel
`
`shall, no later than March 20, 2025, email an electronic copy of the documents to the courtroom
`
`deputy at Diyana_Staples@wawd.uscourts.gov and provide a courtesy hard copy to chambers
`
`(clearly marked “in camera review” to avoid inadvertent filing on the docket by Clerk’s office
`
`staff).
`
`ORDER TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTS FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW - 1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 199 Filed 03/18/25 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`The clerk is directed to REACTIVATE the previously terminated motions (Dkt. Nos. 140,
`
`152) and RE-NOTE them for March 20, 2025.
`
`Dated this 18th day of March, 2025.
`
`A
`
`Kymberly K. Evanson
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`ORDER TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTS FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW - 2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
