throbber
Case: 3:17-cv-00446-wmc Document #: 655 Filed: 08/12/20 Page 1 of 5
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
`
`INGURAN, LLC d/b/a STGENETICS, XY,
`LLC, and CYTONOME/ST, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants,
`
`v.
`
`ABS GLOBAL, INC., GENUS PLC, and
`PREMIUM GENETICS (UK) LTD,
`
`Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs.
`
`FILED UNDER SEAL
`
`Case No. 17-cv-446-wmc
`
`AGREED ORDER STAYING ENFORCEMENT OF
`CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE JUDGMENT
`
`Plaintiffs Inguran, LLC d/b/a STGenetics, XY, LLC, and Cytonome/ST, LLC (collectively
`
`"Plaintiffs" or "ST") and Defendants ABS Global, Inc. and Genus plc (collectively "Defendants"
`
`or "ABS") hereby stipulate to stay the execution of certain portions of the judgment entered by this
`
`Court on June 8, 2020 (Dkt. 607) as amended on June 24, 2020 (Dkt. 613) (collectively, the
`
`"Judgment") pending the disposition of any appeal, as set forth more fully herein. The stay applies
`
`only to the award of damages, interest, and ongoing royalties on pre-judgment sales set forth in
`
`sections l(a)-(d) and 2 of the Judgment (collectively, the "Secured Portions of the Judgment"), but
`
`it does not apply to any ongoing royalties payable on post-judgment sales set forth in section 2 of
`
`the Judgment. The stay is predicated on AB S's provision of an irrevocable stand-by letter of credit,
`
`covering the aforesaid monetary awards in the amount of $13,032,905, naming Plaintiff Inguran,
`
`LLC d/b/a STGenetics as beneficiary having the same terms as the letter attached hereto as Exhibit
`
`A (the "Letter of Credit"). The parties agree that the letter of credit sufficiently protects ST's
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case: 3:17-cv-00446-wmc Document #: 655 Filed: 08/12/20 Page 2 of 5
`
`interest in the Secured Portions of the Judgment and warrants issuance of a stay of those portions
`
`pursuant to Rule 62(b ).
`
`THE COURT BEING OTHERWISE SUFFICIENTLY ADVISED:
`
`1. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND ORDERED that the Letter of Credit issued by
`
`Barclays Bank PLC is approved as an agreed security for the Secured Portions of the
`
`Judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 62 during post-judgment and appellate proceedings in this
`
`matter and Defendants shall procure and cause the same to be delivered to ST within ten (10)
`
`days of the entry of this Order.
`
`2. IT IS FURTHER AGREED AND ORDERED that ST may make demands for
`
`payment on the Letter of Credit, and shall be entitled to the proceeds thereof, without
`
`further order of this Court and consistent with the terms of the Letter of Credit upon the
`
`occurrence of one or more of the following events ("Demand Events"):
`
`a.
`
`If Defendants do not deliver an original Letter of Credit in accordance with
`
`paragraph 1, one (1) business day following the last day to make such delivery;
`
`b.
`
`If Defendants do not take any appeal from the Judgment that would affect
`
`the Secured Portions of the Judgment, five (5) business days following the last day to
`
`appeal;
`
`c.
`
`If Defendants take an appeal affecting the Secured Portions of the Judgment
`
`and as a result the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issues a mandate
`
`affirming or modifying the Judgment without remanding any part of the case, five (5)
`
`business days following the issuance of the mandate; or
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case: 3:17-cv-00446-wmc Document #: 655 Filed: 08/12/20 Page 3 of 5
`
`d.
`
`If, within thirty (30) days or less prior to the expiration of the Letter of
`
`Credit or any other circumstance that could reasonably cause the Letter of Credit to be
`
`unenforceable in full accordance with its terms and the terms of this Order, Plaintiffs have
`
`not been provided with physical delivery of a replacement letter of credit containing terms
`
`that are the same in all material respects to the Letter of Credit. The Demand Event in this
`
`paragraph 2( d) shall apply even if any appeal taken from the Judgment remains pending at
`
`the time ST makes its demand for payment on the Letter of Credit.
`
`e.
`
`If Defendants take an appeal affecting the Secured Portions of the Judgment
`
`and as a result the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remands any part
`
`of the case to the District Court for further proceedings, then the provisions for paragraphs
`
`2(b )-2( d) shall be applied to the judgment entered following such further proceedings.
`
`3.
`
`IT IS FURTHER AGREED AND ORDERED, that upon occurrence of any of the
`
`events set out in paragraph 2(a)-(d), taking into account paragraph 2(e), Plaintiffs may at their
`
`discretion seek to execute on the Judgment by any means permitted by law, including without
`
`limitation by drawing on the Letter of Credit, but Plaintiffs are not limited to execution on the
`
`Letter of Credit. Should Plaintiffs choose to draw on the Letter of Credit following such
`
`events, Plaintiffs shall file with this Court a notification of their intent to make a demand for
`
`payment on the Letter of Credit one ( 1) business day prior to making such demand. Upon
`
`occurrence of the events set out in paragraph 2(b) or 2( d), taking into account paragraph 2( e ),
`
`Plaintiffs shall be entitled to draw upon the Letter of Credit up to the maximum amount of the
`
`Judgment (as it may be modified and/or amended as on such date), plus post-judgment interest
`
`thereon pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. If an occurrence set out in paragraph 2(c), taking into
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case: 3:17-cv-00446-wmc Document #: 655 Filed: 08/12/20 Page 4 of 5
`
`account paragraph 2(e), is the first event to occur under paragraph 2, Plaintiffs shall be entitled
`
`to draw on the Letter of Credit as to that portion of the Judgment which has been affirmed by
`
`the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In the event this Court or the United
`
`States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reduces the amount of the Judgment,
`
`Defendants may provide a replacement letter of credit in the amount of the reduced judgment
`
`but otherwise with the same terms as the original Letter of Credit authorized by this Order. The
`
`provisions of paragraphs 2-3 of this Order shall apply to the reduced judgment.
`
`4. IT IS FURTHER AGREED AND ORDERED that, so long as (i) Defendants and
`
`the issuer of the Letter of Credit maintain the Letter of Credit in compliance with the above
`
`terms of this Order and (ii) no Demand Events authorizing a payment demand to be made on
`
`the Letter of Credit have· occurred, execution of or on the Secured Portions of the
`
`Judgment is stayed and no execution may issue on the Secured Portions of the Judgment
`
`nor may any proceedings be taken to enforce the Secured Portions of the Judgment during
`
`post-judgment or appellate proceedings in this matter, other than as authorized in this
`
`Order. Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude ST from drawing upon the Letter of
`
`Credit consistent with the terms of this Order. In the event that Defendants do not
`
`maintain the Letter of Credit in compliance with the terms above, or the bank issuing the
`
`Letter of Credit fails to honor a payment demand thereunder for any reason, no stay
`
`applies and execution on the Judgment may commence without further Order of this
`
`Court.
`
`IT IS FURTHER AGREED AND ORDERED that, upon a showing of good cause,
`
`either party may request that the Court modify or enforce the terms of this Order and this
`
`Court retains jurisdiction to resolve any disputes concerning this Order.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case: 3:17-cv-00446-wmc Document #: 655 Filed: 08/12/20 Page 5 of 5
`Case: 3:17-cv-00446-wmc Document #: 655 Filed: 08/12/20 Page 5 of 5
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED
`IT IS SO ORDERED
`
`Entered this
`
`//~§b day of Ag% g; 5:
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket