throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 1 of 12
`
`James C. Worthen, # 6-3973
`Hall & Evans, LLC
`152 North Durbin Street, Suite 404
`Casper, Wyoming 82601
`Telephone: (307)333-6701
`Facsimile: (307)333-6352
`worthenj@hallevans.com
`
`T. Thomas Singer, #5-1678
`Hall & Evans, LLC
`175 North 27th Street, Suite 1101
`Billings, MT 59101
`Telephone: (406)969-5227
`Facsimile: (406)969-5233
`singert@hallevans.com
`
`Jaclyn S. Laferriere, (Pro Hac Vice forthcoming)
`Hall & Evans, LLC
`1001 17th Street, Suite 300
`Denver, CO 80202
`Telephone: (303)628-3300
`Facsimile: (303)628-3368
`laferrierej@hallevans.com
`Attorneys for Interpleader-Plaintiff
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING
`
`Civil Action No. _______________
`
`
`
`ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US
`INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois
`Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Interpleader-Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SKY AVIATION CORPORATION, a
`Wyoming Corporation; ROY KENT, an
`individual; ROB CRAGO, an individual;
`ROYAL STUKEY, an individual; LEON
`MILLER, an individual; JUANITA
`
`SAPP, an individual; BRIAN MURRAY,
`an individual; DAVE NORTHROP, an
`individual d/b/a NORTHROP FARMS;
`LYLE EVELO, an individual; RICK
`RODRIQUEZ, an individual; DELFINO
`JUAREZ, an individual; CODY EASUM,
`an individual; MATT SAPP, an
`
`individual; PAT SAPP, an individual;
`FRAN DUNCAN, an individual; TERRY
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 2 of 12
`
`DUNCAN, an individual; JOHN/JANE
`DOES 1-10, and XYZ CORPORATIONS
`1-10,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Interpleader-Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR INTERPLEADER AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMES NOW Plaintiff ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY
`
`
`
`
`
`(“Interpleader-Plaintiff” or “Allianz”), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Federal
`
`Rule of Civil Procedure 22 and 57, and 28 U.S.C. § 2201, and files this Complaint for
`
`Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment against Interpleader-Defendants and respectfully shows
`
`the Court as follows:
`
`PARTIES TO THIS COMPLAINT
`
`1.
`
`Interpleader-Plaintiff, Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company (“Allianz”),
`
`is an insurance corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois with its principal
`
`place of business located in Chicago, Illinois.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Allianz is an insurance company licensed to do business in the State of Wyoming.
`
`Sky Aviation Corporation is a Wyoming corporation with its principal place of
`
`business in Worland, Wyoming.
`
`4.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Roy Kent is an individual and
`
`is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`5.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Roy Kent owns real property
`
`in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`6.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Rob Crago is an individual and
`
`is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 2
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 3 of 12
`
`7.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Rob Crago owns real property
`
`in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`8.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Royal Stukey is an individual
`
`and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`9.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Royal Stukey owns real
`
`property in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`10.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Leon Miller is an individual
`
`and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`11.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Leon Miller leases real
`
`property owned by Juanita Sapp, in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`12.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Juanita Sapp is an individual
`
`and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`13.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Juanita Sapp owns real
`
`property in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`14.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Brian Murray is an individual
`
`and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`15.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Brian Murray owns real
`
`property in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`16.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Dave Northrop is an individual
`
`and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`17.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Dave Northrop owns and
`
`operates Northrop Farms.
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 3
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 4 of 12
`
`18.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Dave Northrop owns real
`
`property in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`19.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Lyle Evelo is an individual
`
`and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`20.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Lyle Evelo owns real property
`
`in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`21.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Rick Rodriquez is an
`
`individual and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`22.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Rick Rodriquez owns real
`
`property in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`23.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Delfino Juarez is an individual
`
`and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`24.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Delfino Juarez owns real
`
`property in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`25.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Cody Easum is an individual
`
`and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`26.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Cody Easum owns real
`
`property in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`27.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Matt Sapp is an individual and
`
`is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`28.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Matt Sapp owns real property
`
`in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 4
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 5 of 12
`
`29.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Pat Sapp is an individual and
`
`is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`30.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Pat Sapp owns real property in
`
`Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`31.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Fran Duncan is an individual
`
`and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`32.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Fran Duncan owns real
`
`property in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`33.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Terry Duncan is an individual
`
`and is a resident and citizen of Powell, Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`34.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant Terry Duncan owns real
`
`property in Park County, State of Wyoming.
`
`35.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant John/Jane Does 1–10 are
`
`individuals and are residents of the State of Wyoming. Interpleader-Defendant John/Jane Does
`
`1–10 are unknown Interpleader-Defendants who, upon information and belief, may have suffered
`
`damages as a result of the event described below.
`
`36.
`
`On information and belief, Interpleader-Defendant XYZ Corporations 1–10 are
`
`corporations and are residents of the State of Wyoming. Interpleader-Defendant XYZ
`
`Corporations 1–10 are unknown Interpleader-Defendants who, upon information and belief, may
`
`have suffered damages as a result of the event described below.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 5
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 6 of 12
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`37.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because
`
`every Interpleader-Defendant is diverse in citizenship from Interpleader-Plaintiff, and the
`
`amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00.
`
`38.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over this interpleader action pursuant to Federal Rule
`
`of Civil Procedure 22. An actual and substantial controversy exists between the parties. Allianz
`
`is subject to competing claims for the limits of liability under an Aircraft Insurance Policy issued
`
`to its insured, Sky Aviation Corporation.
`
`39.
`
`Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because all of the defendants live in
`
`Wyoming and at least one defendant lives in Park County, Wyoming, which is located in this
`
`Court’s judicial district. Furthermore, the events giving rise to this action occurred in Park
`
`County, Wyoming.
`
`THE INCIDENT
`
`40.
`
`Sky Aviation Corporation is a Wyoming corporation which provides, among
`
`other services, aerial application for agriculture.
`
`41.
`
`On or about May 28, 2019, through May 31, 2019, a pilot-operated spray switch
`
`on a helicopter used for aerial application on behalf of Sky Aviation Corporation failed while
`
`conducting aerial application operations near Powell, Wyoming.
`
`42.
`
` The failure caused the intermittent uncommanded activation of the spray pump
`
`and nozzles, resulting in drift damage to trees and agricultural crops on certain real property in
`
`Park County, Wyoming (“the incident”).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 6
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 7 of 12
`
`THE POLICY
`
`43.
`
`Allianz issued an Aircraft Insurance Policy to Named Insured Sky Aviation
`
`Corporation, policy number A2GA000355319AM (“the Policy”), attached as Exhibit A.
`
`44.
`
`The Policy had a policy period of May 2, 2019, to May 2, 2020, and was in effect
`
`at the time of incident.
`
`45.
`
`The Policy issued to Sky Aviation Corporation included an Amendatory Aerial
`
`Application Endorsement with an effective date of May 2, 2019, which states as follows in
`
`relevant part:
`
`AMENDATORY AERIAL APPLICATION ENDORSEMENT
`
`* * *
`
`Regardless of anything to the contrary in Exclusion 9. d) of this policy, the Company will pay on behalf of the In-
`sured all sums the Insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury or
`prop-erty damage resulting from the aerial application of chemicals applied by the Named Insured. The total
`limit of the Company’s liability for coverage provided by this endorsement shall not exceed the limits stated
`below:
`
`LIMITS OF INSURANCE - The following limits apply only to the Chemical category:
`CC.
`
`* * *
`COVERAGE D: SINGLE LIMIT BODILY
`INJURY
`AND
`DAMAGE
`PROPERTY
`EXCLUDING PASSENGERS
`
`
`$ 200,000
`$ 200,000
`
`Each Occurrence
`Aggregate
`
`(Policy, AMENDATORY AERIAL APPLICATION ENDORSEMENT, Endorsement
`
`Number 5, AGCS-AV 8200 (07-06), Exhibit A, at p. 26.)
`
`46.
`
`The Endorsement provides the following definitions:
`
`“Aerial Application” means the application of chemicals by aircraft including flights to and from the place
`the Insured will be applying chemicals.
`
`“Chemical(s)” means any substance or mixture of substances intended to prevent, destroy, repel or mitigate any
`pest, or any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant or tree regulator, defoliant or
`desiccant. The common name of a chemical includes preparations of the chemical, in any form, having a trade or
`proprietary name.
`
`
`"Comprehensive Chemical (CC)" means seeds, fertilizers, or any chemical.
`
`* * *
`
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 7
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 8 of 12
`
`(Policy, AMENDATORY AERIAL APPLICATION ENDORSEMENT, Endorsement
`
`Number 5, AGCS-AV 8200 (07-06), Exhibit A, at p. 27.)
`
`47.
`
`The Insuring Agreements of the Policy states as follows in relevant part:
`
`INSURING AGREEMENTS
`
`The Company agrees:
`
`* * *
`
`4) DEFENSE, SETTLEMENT AND SUPPLEMENT-
`ARY PAYMENTS
`
`Under Coverages A, B, C and D
`
`The Company shall have the right and duty to de-
`fend any suit against the Insured seeking damages
`on account of Bodily Injury or Property Damage,
`even if any of the allegations of the suit are
`ground-less, false or fraudulent, and may make
`such inves-tigation and settlement of any claim or
`suit as it deems expedient, but the Company shall
`not be ob-ligated to pay any claim or judgment or
`to defend any suit after the applicable limit of the
`Company’s
`liability has been exhausted by
`payment of judg-ments or settlements.
`
`* * *
`
`(Policy, INSURING AGREEMENTS, AGCS-AC 1400 (09-09), Exhibit A, at p. 10.)
`
`48.
`
`The subject of this interpleader action is the remaining proceeds under the
`
`Amendatory Aerial Application Endorsement’s $200,000.00 bodily injury and property damage
`
`liability limit for each occurrence and in the aggregate.
`
`49.
`
`Due to a prior settlement of $601.04, the available bodily injury and property
`
`damage liability coverage is $199,398.96.
`
`COUNT I – INTERPLEADER
`
`50.
`
`Paragraphs One (1) through Forty-Nine (49) are incorporated and realleged as
`
`though fully set forth herein.
`
`51.
`
`Upon information and belief, Interpleader-Defendants resided on, owned, or
`
`leased real property that was the subject of the incident.
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 8
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 9 of 12
`
`52.
`
`Upon information and belief, Interpleader-Defendants may assert various claims
`
`against Sky Aviation Corporation as a result of the incident, including claims for property
`
`damage and/or bodily injury.
`
`53.
`
`Upon information and belief, the Policy provides bodily injury and property
`
`damage coverage to Interpleader-Defendants as a result of the incident.
`
`54.
`
`Upon information and belief, Interpleader-Defendants have made or may make
`
`claims on the Policy as a result of the incident for their bodily injury and/or property damage.
`
`55.
`
`The claims made on the Policy against Sky Aviation Corporation as a result of the
`
`incident exceed the Amendatory Aerial Application Endorsement’s bodily injury and property
`
`damage liability limit, which is $200,000 each occurrence and in the aggregate
`
`56.
`
`The claims made on the Policy may expose Allianz and/or Sky Aviation
`
`Corporation to multiple liability, including multiple claims on the same limited bodily injury and
`
`property damage coverage available under the Policy.
`
`57.
`
`The interests that Interpleader-Defendants claim are adverse and independent to
`
`the other Interpleader-Defendants because the claims asserted may exceed the policy limits.
`
`58.
`
`Allianz is unsure which Interpleader-Defendant is entitled to what portion of the
`
`funds.
`
`59.
`
`Allianz is a disinterested stakeholder with reasonable doubt as to the party or
`
`parties entitled to funds in its possession.
`
`60.
`
`Allianz in good faith interpleads the Defendants and is therefore entitled to
`
`recover its reasonable attorney fees and costs.
`
`61.
`
`Allianz timely files this complaint after receiving notice of multiple claims in
`
`order to full discharge its liability and to permit Interpleader-Defendants to establish their claim
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 9
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 10 of 12
`
`or claims to the disputed funds. Allianz has not unreasonably delayed filing an action for
`
`interpleader.
`
`62.
`
`Allianz is now ready, willing, and able to pay the funds to the person or persons
`
`legally entitled to them. However, because Allianz cannot determine the merits or validity of the
`
`respective claims to the funds, Allianz is, therefore, exposed to multiple liability.
`
`63.
`
`Allianz is in possession of the property subject to this interpleader and agrees and
`
`intends to unconditionally tender the property into the Court’s registry. Allianz requests leave to
`
`deposit the disputed property into the registry of the Court.
`
`64.
`
`Each of the Interpleader-Defendants should be required to demonstrate their claim
`
`against the Policy or be barred from making any claim against the Policy.
`
`65.
`
`Due to a prior settlement of $601.04, the available bodily injury and property
`
`damage liability coverage is $199,398.96.
`
`66.
`
`Allianz has no duty to pay any amount more than its $200,000 policy proceeds in
`
`this interpleader proceeding where the remaining policy amount of $199,398.96 has been
`
`interpleaded and deposited with the Court.
`
`COUNT II – DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`67.
`
`Paragraphs One (1) through Sixty-Six (66) are incorporated and realleged as
`
`though fully set forth herein.
`
`68.
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 57 and 28 U.S. Code § 2201, Allianz
`
`seeks a judicial determination concerning the scope and nature of its rights and obligations under
`
`its Policy issued to Sky Aviation Corporation, policy number A2GA000355319AM.
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 10
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 11 of 12
`
`69.
`
`Allianz is entitled to the Court’s declaratory judgment that Allianz has discharged
`
`all of its indemnification obligations under the Policy and owes no further duty to indemnify Sky
`
`Aviation Corporation under the Policy for claims against it because of the incident.
`
`70.
`
`Allianz is entitled to a declaration that once its limit of liability insurance has been
`
`exhausted its duty to defend ends.
`
`71.
`
`Once Allianz deposits the remaining policy limits of $199,398.96 into the Court
`
`and is dismissed from the Interpleader, its duty to defend Sky Aviation Corporation ends,
`
`pursuant to the Policy.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`72.
`
`For these reasons, Interpleader-Plaintiff Allianz requests that the Court do the
`
`following:
`
`a. Declare the Interpleader appropriate;
`
`b. Authorize Interpleader-Plaintiff to deposit the remaining proceeds of Policy
`
`Number A2GA000355319AM into the Court’s registry;
`
`c. Declare that by paying the policy limits into the Court’s registry, Interpleader-
`
`Plaintiff’s obligations under the Policy are satisfied and discharge Interpleader-
`
`Plaintiff from any further liability under said policy;
`
`d. Dismiss Interpleader-Plaintiff from this litigation with prejudice;
`
`e. Enjoin and restrain Interpleader-Defendants and anyone claiming by or through
`
`them from instituting any action or proceeding in any state or federal court against
`
`Allianz or Sky Aviation Corporation related to the Policy proceeds or the
`
`coverage under the Policy, including any interest or claims related thereto;
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 11
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00114-SWS Document 1 Filed 05/17/22 Page 12 of 12
`
`f. Award Interpleader-Plaintiff its costs and attorney fees associated with this action
`
`from the funds it seeks to interplead;
`
`g. Award Interpleader-Plaintiff all other relief to which it is entitled.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted this 17th day of May, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ James C. Worthen
`James C. Worthen #6-3973
`Hall & Evans, LLC
`152 North Durbin Street, Suite 404
`Casper, Wyoming 82601
`Telephone: (307)333-6701
`Facsimile: (307)333-6352
`worthenj@hallevans.com
`
`T. Thomas Singer, #5-1678
`Hall & Evans, LLC
`175 North 27th Street, Suite 1101
`Billings, MT 59101
`Telephone: (406)969-5227
`Facsimile: (406)969-5233
`singert@hallevans.com
`
`Jaclyn S. Laferriere, (Pro Hac Vice forthcoming)
`Hall & Evans, LLC
`1001 17th Street, Suite 300
`Denver, CO 80202
`Telephone: (303)628-3300
`Facsimile: (303)628-3368
`laferrierej@hallevans.com
`Attorneys for Interpleader-Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Judgment – Page 12
`Allianz Global Risks US Ins.Co. v. Sky Aviation, et al.; Civil Action No. ________
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket