`
`Document:42
`
`Page:1
`
`Filed: 03/15/2024
`
`Note: This order is nonprecedential.
`
`GAnited States Court of Appeals
`for the Pederal Circuit
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Appellant
`
`Vv.
`
`MASIMO CORPORATION,
`Appellee
`
`2022-1890
`
`Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-
`01523.
`
`ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND
`REHEARING EN BANC
`
`Before Moore, Chief Judge, LOURIE, DYK, PROST, REYNA,
`TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, STOLL, CUNNINGHAM, and
`STARK, Circuit Judges.!
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`!
`
`Circuit Judge Newman did not participate.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case: 22-1890 Page:2_Filed: 03/15/2024Document:42
`
`
`
`2
`
`APPLE INC. v. MASIMO CORPORATION
`
`ORDER
`
`Apple Inc. filed a combinedpetition for panel rehearing
`and rehearing en banc. The petition was referred to the
`panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for
`rehearing en banc was referred to the circuit judges who
`are in regular active service.
`
`Upon consideration thereof,
`
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`
`Thepetition for panel rehearing is denied.
`
`Thepetition for rehearing en bancis denied.
`
`The mandate of the court will issue on March 22, 2024.
`
`FOR THE COURT
`
`
`
`Jarrett B. Perlow
`Clark of Court
`
`March 15. 2024
`
`Date
`
`



