`
`1.
`
`Improper Request — The AFCP 2.0 request is improper for the following reason(s) and the after final amendment submitted with
`the request will be treated under pre-pilot procedure.
`[-] An AFCP 2.0 request form PTO/SB/434 (or equivalent document) was not submitted.
`LJ] A non-broadening amendmentto at least one independentclaim wasnot submitted.
`[] A proper AFCP 2.0 request was submitted in responseto the mostrecentfinal rejection.
`] Other:
`
`2. Proper Request
`
`A. After final amendment submitted with the request will not be treated under AFCP 2.0.
`Theafter final amendment cannot be reviewed and a search conducted within the guidelines of the pilot program.
`_] The after final amendmentwill be treated underpre-pilot procedure.
`
`B. Updated search and/or completed additional consideration.
`The examiner performed an updated search and/or completed additional consideration of the after final amendment
`within the time authorized for the pilot program. The result(s) of the updated search and/or completed additional
`consideration are:
`
`[_] 1. All ofthe rejections in the mostrecentfinal Office action are overcome and a Notice of Allowanceis
`issued herewith.
`
`[XX] 2. The after final amendment would not overcomeall of the rejections in the mostrecentfinal Office action.
`See attached interview summaryfor further details.
`_] 3. Theafter final amendment was reviewed, and it raises a new issue(s). See attached interview summary for
`further details.
`
`L] 4. The after final amendmentraises new issues, but would overcomeall of the rejections in the most recent
`final Office action. A decision on determining allowability could not be made within the guidelines of the
`pilot. See attached interview summaryfor further details, including any newly discoveredpriorart.
`(] 5. Other:
`
`
`
`AFCP2.0
`Decision
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`13/533,074
`Examiner
`
`CORCORAN, KEVIN L.
`Art Unit
`
`Stephen Choi
`
`3724
`
`Examiner Note: Please attach an interview summary when necessary as described above. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`PTOL-2323 (Rev. 10-14)
`
`AFCP 2.0 Decision
`
`Part of Paper No. 20150220
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
