throbber
AMENDMENTSTO THE CLAIMS
`
`Please amend the claims as follows:
`
`1.
`
`(Amended) A system for reducing electronic alarms in a medical patient
`
`monitoring system, the system comprising:
`
`an optical sensor configured to transmit optical radiation into a tissue site
`
`of a patient and detect attenuated optical radiation indicative of at
`
`least one
`
`physiological parameter of a patient; and
`
`one or more hardware processors in electronic communication with the
`
`optical sensor, the one or more hardware processors configuredto:
`
`[measure] determine oxygen saturation values of [a] the patient
`
`overa first period of time;
`
`[determine if] when at least one oxygen saturation value obtained
`
`over the first period of time exceeds a first alarm threshold[;], determine
`
`whether a first alarm should be triggered[ based on the determination that
`
`the at least one oxygen saturation value obtained over the first period of
`
`time exceedsthe first alarm threshold]:
`
`[determine] access a second alarm threshold to be applied during a
`
`second period of time subsequentto the first period of time, the second
`
`alarm threshold replacing the first alarm threshold, wherein the second
`
`alarm threshold [being determined by:]
`
`[comparing at least a first oxygen saturation value obtained
`
`during thefirst time period with a lowerlimit associated with oxygen
`
`saturation; and]
`
`[computing a
`
`second alarm threshold based on the
`
`comparison where the second alarm threshold is computed to be
`
`at] has_a value less than the at least first oxygen saturation value
`
`and greater than [the] a lowerlimit and at an offset from theatleast
`
`first oxygen saturation value, wherein the offset [is configured to
`
`diminish] is diminished as a difference between the at leastfirst
`
`oxygen saturation value and the lower limit diminishes;
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`[measure] determine oxygen saturation values of [a] the patient
`
`over the second period of time [to determine at least a second oxygen
`
`saturation value]; and
`
`[determine whether] trigger a second alarm [should be triggered by
`
`determining if] based on at least one value of the oxygen saturation values
`
`obtained [during] over the second period of time [exceeds] exceeding the
`
`second alarm threshold [and triggering an alarm if
`
`it
`
`is determined the
`
`second alarm should betriggered].
`
`2.
`
`(Amended) The system of Claim 1, wherein the one or more hardware
`
`processors are configured to calculate a first baseline measurement
`
`from the
`
`[measured] oxygen saturation values overthe first period of time and wherein the at
`
`least one [oxygen saturation] value obtained during the first period of time corresponds
`
`to the first baseline measurement.
`
`3.
`
`(Amended) The system of Claim 2, wherein the one or more hardware
`
`processors are configured to calculate a second baseline measurement from the
`
`[measured] oxygen saturation values over the second period of time and wherein the at
`
`least one [oxygen saturation] value obtained during the second period of
`
`time
`
`corresponds to the second baseline measurement.
`
`4.
`
`(Amended) The system of Claim 1, wherein the lower limit is [predefined]
`
`predetermined and corresponds to a minimum parameter value for oxygen saturation.
`
`5.
`
`(Original) The system of Claim 1, wherein the one or more hardware
`
`processors are further configured to wait for a time delay prior to the triggering of the
`
`second alarm, and wherein the time delay is a function of the second alarm threshold.
`
`6.
`
`(Amended) The system of Claim 5, wherein the time delay decreases as
`
`the difference between the at least one [first oxygen saturation] value and the lower limit
`
`diminishes.
`
`t.
`
`(Original) The system of Claim 1, wherein the first alarm threshold is
`
`predetermined.
`
`-4.
`
`

`

`8.
`
`(Amended) A system for reducing electronic alarms in a medical patient
`
`monitoring system including a pulse oximeter in communication with an optical sensor,
`
`the system comprising one or more hardware processors configured to:
`
`[measure] determine oxygen saturation values of a patient over a first
`
`period of time;
`
`period of time exceedsafirst alarm threshold;
`
`determine if at least one oxygen saturation value obtained overthefirst
`
`[determine whether a first alarm should be triggered based on the
`
`determination that the at least one oxygen saturation value obtained overthe first
`
`period of time exceeds thefirst alarm threshold; ]
`
`[compare at least a first oxygen saturation value obtained during the first
`
`time period with a lowerlimit associated with oxygen saturation; ]
`
`[compute] access a second alarm threshold [based on the comparison];
`
`[determine] apply_a time delay based on the [computed] second alarm
`
`threshold, wherein the time delay approaches zero as the [first] at_least_one
`
`oxygen saturation value obtained over the first_period of time approaches the
`
`lower limit:
`
`[measure] determine oxygen saturation values of [a] the patient over [the]
`
`a_second period of time different from the first period [to determine at least a
`
`second oxygen saturation value]; and
`
`trigger
`
`[determine whether] a second alarm [should be triggered by
`
`determining if] based on the at least one oxygen saturation value obtained during
`
`the second period of time [exceeds] exceeding the second alarm threshold [for
`
`the time delay and triggering an alarm if it is determined the second alarm should
`
`be triggered].
`
`9.
`
`(Original) The system of Claim 8, wherein the first alarm threshold is
`
`predetermined.
`
`10.
`
`(Amended) The system of Claim 8, wherein the lower limit is [predefined]
`
`predetermined and corresponds to a minimum parameter value for oxygen saturation.
`
`5-
`
`

`

`11.
`
`(Amended) The system of Claim 8, where the second alarm threshold is
`
`[computed to be] at a value less than the at least first oxygen saturation value and
`
`greater than the lower limit and at an offset from the first oxygen saturation value,
`
`wherein the offset is [configured to] diminished as a difference between the at leastfirst
`
`oxygen saturation value and the lower limit diminishes.
`
`12.
`
`(Amended) An electronic method [for] ofreducing electronic alarms in a
`
`medical patient monitoring system, the electronic method comprising:
`
`measuring, with a pulse oximeter including a light source, an optical
`
`detector and one or more hardware processors configured to receive
`
`signals responsive to light attenuated by tissue of a patient, oxygen
`
`saturation values of [a] the patient over a first period of time;
`
`determining, using the one or more hardware processors, if at least
`
`one oxygen saturation value [determined] measured over the first period
`
`of time exceedsa first alarm threshold;
`
`[determining whethera first alarm should be triggered based on the
`
`determination that at least one oxygen saturation value obtained during
`
`the first period of time exceeds the first alarm threshold; ]
`
`[comparing at least a first oxygen saturation value obtained during
`
`the first time period with a lower limit associated with oxygen saturation; ]
`
`[computing the]applying,
`
`using the one or more hardware
`
`processors, a second alarm threshold [based on the comparison where
`
`the second alarm threshold is computed to be] at a value (i) less than [the
`
`at least first] anoxygen saturation value_of the patient, [and] (ii) greater
`
`than [the] a_lower limit__(ili) and at an offset from the [first] oxygen
`
`saturation value_of the patient, wherein the offset
`
`[is configured to
`
`diminish] is diminished as a difference between the [at leastfirst] oxygen
`
`saturation value and the lower limit diminishes and wherein [the second
`
`alarm threshold is configured to be applied during a second period of time
`
`subsequent
`
`to the first period of
`
`time,]
`
`the second alarm threshold
`
`[replacing] replaces the first alarm threshold;
`
`-6-
`
`

`

`measuring, using the pulse oximeter, oxygen saturation values of
`
`[a] the patient over the second period of time to determine at least a
`
`second oxygen saturation value; and
`
`determining, using the one or more hardware processors, whether
`[a] to trigger a second alarm [should be triggered] by at least determiningif
`
`at least one oxygen saturation value obtained during the second period of
`
`time exceeds the second alarm threshold [and triggering an alarm if it is
`
`determined the second alarm should be triggered].
`
`13.
`
`(Amended) The electronic method of Claim 12, wherein [the one or more
`
`hardware processors are configured to] the electronic method further comprises, using
`
`the one or more hardware processors,
`
`[calculate]
`
`calculating a first baseline
`
`measurement from the measured oxygen saturation values over the first period of time
`
`and wherein the at least one oxygen saturation value obtained during the first period of
`
`time corresponds to the first baseline measurement.
`
`14.
`
`(Amended) The electronic method of Claim 13, wherein [the one or more
`
`hardware processors are configured to] the electronic method further comprises, using
`
`the one or more hardware processors,
`
`[calculate] calculating a second baseline
`
`measurement from the measured oxygen saturation values over the second period of
`
`time and wherein the at least one oxygen saturation value obtained during the second
`
`period of time corresponds to the second baseline measurement.
`
`15.
`
`(Amended) The electronic method of Claim 12, wherein the lower limit is
`
`[predefined] predetermined and corresponds to a minimum parameter value for oxygen
`
`saturation.
`
`16.
`
`(Amended) The electronic method of Claim 12, wherein [the one or more
`
`hardware processors are configured to] the electronic method further comprises, using
`
`the one or more hardware processors, waiting for a time delay prior to the triggering of
`
`the second alarm, and wherein the time delay is a function of the second alarm
`
`threshold.
`
`-7-
`
`

`

`17.
`
`(Original) The electronic method of Claim 16, wherein the time delay
`
`decreases as the difference between the at least first oxygen saturation value and the
`
`lower limit diminishes.
`
`18.
`
`(Original) The electronic method of Claim 12, wherein the first alarm
`
`threshold is predetermined.
`
`19.
`
`(New) A system for reducing electronic alarms in_a patient_monitoring
`
`system, the system comprising:
`
`an optical sensor configured to transmit optical radiation into a tissue site
`
`of a patient_and_detect_attenuated_ optical
`
`radiation indicative of an oxygen
`
`saturation of a patient; and
`
`one or more hardware processors in electronic communication with the
`
`optical sensor, the one or more hardware processors configured to use an alarm
`
`threshold in determining whether to activate an alarm, the alarm threshold being
`
`at_a value less than a prior oxygen saturation of the patient by a difference,
`
`wherein the difference diminishes based on the prior oxygen saturation of the
`
`patient.
`
`20.
`
`(New) The system of Claim 19, wherein the difference diminishes in
`
`responseto a decrease in the patient’s oxygen saturation until it reaches zero.
`
`21.
`
`(New) The system of Claim 19, wherein the diminishmentis proportional
`
`to the difference.
`
`22.
`
`(New) The system of Claim 19, wherein the diminishment is a stepwise
`
`function of discrete diminishment steps.
`
`23.
`
`(New) The system of Claim 19, wherein the system automatically
`
`determines the alarm threshold.
`
`-8-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket