throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`16/585,790
`
`09/27/2019
`
`Frank HaronPreiss
`
`DMCO007USCon4
`
`6155
`
`81796
`
`7590
`
`04/09/2021
`
`Moyles IP, LLC
`1 Enterprise Drive, Suite 428
`Shelton, CT 06484
`
`EXAMINER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`04/09/2021
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Commissionerfor Patents
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`In re Application of
`Preiss etal.
`U.S. Pat. No. 10,844,697
`Issued: November 24, 2020
`For: PERFORATION GUN
`
`COMPONENTS AND SYSTEM
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`NOTIFICATION OF IMPROPER
`PRIOR ART CITATION UNDER
`37 CFR 1.501
`
`The submission filed on March 3, 2021 filed by a third party under 37 CFR 1.501 is hereby
`acknowledged to have been received and reviewed by the Patent and Trademark Office. The
`requirements for a properprior art citation under 37 CFR 1.501 are as follows:
`
`A)prior art submitted must be limited to “written prior art consisting of patents and
`publications”. Any submission that contains any issue not directed to patents and publications
`will not be entered into the file and will be returned unconsidered, despite the fact that it may
`also contain “properly considerable” prior art. MPEP 2205.
`
`B) an explanation of how the person submitting the prior art considersit to be pertinent
`and applicable to the patent.
`
`C) an explanation of whyit is believed that the prior art has a bearing on the patentability
`of any claim of the patent.
`
`D)if filed by a party other than the patent owner, an indication must be present that a
`copy of the submission has been served on the patent owner, or includes a duplicate copy if
`service on the patent owner wasnotpossible.
`
`Theprior art submission filed March 3, 2021 fails to meet the requirement of item A) above.
`Pursuant MPEP 2205, “itihe submission must be directed to patents. printed publications and/or
`written claim scope statements and additional information and cannot discuss what the patent
`owner did, or failed to do, with respect to submitting and/or describing patents and printed
`publications during examination, because that would be a statement as to the conduct of the
`patent owner.” The submission includes statements discussing what the patent owner did during
`examination as well as statements with regards to patent owner’s past grant condnct in a
`proceeding before a Federal court or the Office.
`
`

`

`Application No. 16/585,790
`
`Page 3
`
`Telephone inquiries related to this letter should be directed to Teri P. Luu, Quality Assurance
`Specialist, at (571) 272-7045.
`
`/Katherine Matecki/
`
`Katherine Matecki, Director
`Patent Technology Center 3600
`(571) 272-5250
`
`KM/tl: 03/31/21
`
`Cc:
`
`Bryce A. Johnson
`Buche & Associates, P.C.
`875 Prospect Suite 305
`La Jolla, CA 92037
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket