`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/333,029
`
`05/28/2021
`
`Brian Alexander MARTIN
`
`10616US04CON
`
`2917
`
`Xsensts
`
`/Sony
`
`mens
`
`Xsensus / Sony
`100 Daingerfield Road, Suite 402
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`SOHRAB, MALICK ARIF
`
`2414
`
`10/21/2024
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`Xdocket @ XSensus.com
`
`Xsensuspat@ XSensus.com
`anaquadocketing @ Xsensus.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`17/333,029
`MARTIN et al.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF)StatusExaminer
`MALICK A SOHRAB
`2414
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORYPERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensionsof time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 09/03/2024.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)[¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)(2) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`16-36 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C} Claim(s)__ is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 16-36 is/are rejected.
`(] Claim(s)__ is/are objectedto.
`C] Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)( The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filed on 05/28/2021 is/are: a)[¥) accepted or b)(.) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)(¥) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`_—_c)L) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)Y) All
`1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. |
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`*“ See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20241011
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This office action is a response to the Application/Control Number: 17/333,029 filed on
`
`05/28/2021.
`
`2.
`
`This office action is based upon claims received on 09/03/2024, which replaceall prior or other
`
`Claims Status
`
`submitted versions of the claims.
`
`-Claims 1-15 are cancelled.
`
`-Claims 16, 30, 36 are amended.
`
`-Claims 16-36 are pending.
`
`-Claims 16-36 are rejected.
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`3.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first
`
`inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Priority
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`Acknowledgmentis made of a 371 of PCT/EP2014/060199,filed 05/19/2014.
`
`Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-
`
`(d). Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which
`
`papers have been placed of recordin the file.
`
`6.
`
`Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35
`
`U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged.
`
`Response to Remarks/Amendments
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 3
`
`7.
`
`Applicant's remarks/arguments, see pages 1-4 of 4 pages, filed 09/03/2024, with respect to
`
`REMARKS/ARGUMENTS, have been noted.
`
`8.
`
`Applicant's remarks/arguments, see page 1 of 4 pages,filed 09/03/2024, with respect to the Claim
`
`Rejections under Double Patenting, and applicant’s remarks pertaining to rejections be held in abeyance
`
`and applicant’s remarks regarding filing a terminal disclosure have been noted. The double patenting
`
`rejections of Claims 16-36 presented in the most recent office action remain in effect and are held in
`
`abeyance as requested.
`
`9.
`
`Applicant's remarks/arguments, see page 1-2 of 4 pages, filed 09/03/2024, with respect to the
`
`Claims rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a), have been considered in light of applicants remarks and
`
`arguments presented on the record. The rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) of Claims 16, 30, 36 and
`
`dependent Claims 17, 18, 27, 29, 31 are withdrawnin light of applicant’s remarks and arguments
`
`presented for the record.
`
`10.
`
`Applicant's remarks/arguments, see page 1-2 of 4 pages, filed 09/03/2024, with respect to the
`
`Claims rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b), have been considered in light of applicant’s amendment and
`
`remarks. The rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) of Claims 16 - 36 are withdrawn in light of applicant’s
`
`amendments.
`
`11.
`
`Applicant's remarks/arguments, see page 2-3 of 4 pages, filed 09/03/2024, with respect to Claim
`
`Rejections including independent claims 16, 30, 36 have been considered but are moot because the
`
`arguments do notapply to the new grounds of rejection being used in the current rejection.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 4
`
`Furthermore, remarks with respect to Dependent Claims 17-29, 31-35, have been considered,
`
`and are mootfor the same reasons noted above, and/or are not persuasive at least via dependencyto the
`
`independent claims and via individual rejections addressing the specific claims.
`
`The rejection has been revised and set forth below according to the amended claims (see Office
`
`Action).
`
`12.
`
`To the extent the office relies on Yamada et al.
`
`(US 8457151 B2),
`
`i.e. “Yamada”, examiner
`
`respectfully contends applicant’s remarks/arguments directed to Yamada are not persuasive, and Yamada
`
`as utilized discloses applicant’s submitted claim limitations as noted below.
`
`A.
`
`Applicant in remarks presented See page 3 of 4 of 4 pages(In 6-13) utilizing amended Claim 16
`
`as an example, indicates: “while it is not particularly clear on what basis the Office considers the paging
`
`request at $114 of Yamada to correspond to the claimed downlink communications,it is clear that
`
`Yamada fails to speak to the selection of the operating frequency band position by mobile station 200
`
`for receipt of the paging request. Yamada fails to disclose or teach transmit the downlink
`
`communications to the terminal device within the channel, the terminal device having selected the
`
`channel to be used for the downlink communications based on the entirety of the identifier associated
`
`with the terminal device independently of the base station”.
`
`B.
`
`In response examiner respectfully contends that applicant’s remarks are not persuasive, and
`
`notes that the rejection of claim 16 (utilized as example representing parallel features in claim 30, 36) is
`
`presented as are rejected under35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamadaetal. (US 8457151 B2),
`
`i.e. “Yamada”in view ofJi et al (US 20160013891 A1),i.e. “Ji”, where Yamada is relied upon for the claim
`
`16 limitations pertaining to applicant’s remarksas follows:
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 5
`
`the circuitry configured to: select a channel to be used for downlink communicationsfor a
`
`terminal device from amongtheplurality of channels based on [[the]] an entirety of_an identifier
`
`associated with the terminal device (Yamada FIG. 34 (A) & FIG. 34 (B), FIG. 36; Col 37 (In 33-36, 37-55)
`
`... The operating frequency bandposition of the mobile station is identified by including the candidate
`
`numbersof FIG. 34(A) and IDs of FIG. 34(B) in the location registration request and the paging request...
`
`An algorithm is then proposed that identifies the operating frequency band position from the subscriber
`
`identification information IMSI and the above mobile station classes.... shifted frequency position number
`
`(Ps)=IMSI/Npi modNs(Eq. 28).... lf the subscriber identification information IMSI and the ID indicating
`
`the available frequency bandwidth of the mobile station are includedin the location registration request
`
`and the paging request, the operating frequency band position of the mobile station can beidentified
`
`with the above calculating equations in the base station; FIG. 36, Col 38 (In 31- 38) See above)
`
`Whichthe office action respectfully contends and notesdiscloses:_i.e. per Col 37 (In 33-36, 37-
`
`55) the operating frequency band position of the mobile station can be identified with the above
`
`calculating equations in the base station and perCol 38 (In 31- 38)... the base station 100 calculates and
`
`retains the operating frequency band position of the mobile station 200 reads on: select a channel to be
`
`used from the subscriber identification information, where i.e. and transmits the packet of the paging
`
`request at the operating frequency bandposition (S114) reads on: for downlink communicationsfor a
`
`terminal device, where i.e. The operating frequency band position of the mobile station is identified by
`
`includingi.e. the candidate numbersof FIG. 34(A) reads on: from amongtheplurality of channels where
`
`per Col 37 (In 21-29, 30-31) 10-MHz bandwidth ability has two candidates...5-MHz bandwidth ability has
`
`four candidates...2.5-MHz bandwidth ability has eight candidates....1.25-MHz bandwidth has 16
`
`candidates, and wherei.e. the base station 100 calculates and retains the operating frequency band
`
`position of the mobile station 200 from the subscriber identification information and i.e. per Col 37 (In
`
`33-36, 37-55) identifies the operating frequency band position from the subscriber identification
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 6
`
`information IMSI and...shifted frequency position number(Ps)=IMSI/Npi mod Ns (Eq. 28) and per Col 38
`
`(In 31- 38)... the base station 100 calculates and retains the operating frequency band position of the
`
`mobile station 200 from the subscriber identification information reads on: based on an entirety of an
`
`identifier associated with the terminal device the entire IMSIis utilized in the equations referenced.
`
`that is set by an entity other than the base station and the terminal device (Yamada FIG. 36
`
`Col 38 (In 22-30)...the location management device 300 acquires the subscriber identification information
`
`of the destination mobile station 200 of the packet and the available frequency bandwidth and the
`
`location registration area of the mobile station 200 from the location management database and sends
`
`out a paging request including the subscriber identification information (IMSI) and the available
`
`frequency bandwidth of the mobile station to the base station of the location registration area (S112))
`
`Whichthe office action respectfully contends and notesdiscloses: i.e. the location management
`
`device 300 that sends the subscriber identification information (IMSI) and the available frequency
`
`bandwidth of the mobile station reads on: that is set by an entity other than the base station and the
`
`terminal device ;
`
`and transmit the downlink communications to the terminal device within the channel Yamada
`
`FIG. 36 & Col 38 (In 31- 38) See above);
`
`Whichthe office action respectfully contends and notes discloses: the base station 100
`
`calculates and retains the operating frequency band position of the mobile station 200 from the
`
`subscriber identification information, where i.e. and transmits the packet of the paging request at the
`
`operating frequency band position (S114) reads on: and transmit the downlink communications to the
`
`terminal device within the channel).
`
`Furthermore, regarding applicant’s remarks see references abovei.e. “while it is not particularly
`
`clear on whatbasis the Office considers the paging request at $114 of Yamada to correspond to the
`
`claimed downlink communications”, the office action respectfully contends as presented that “the
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 7
`
`paging request” reads on: “downlink communications”as recited as also acknowledged by applicant
`
`further in its remarks indicating “selection of the operating frequency band position by mobile station
`
`200 for receipt of the paging request” where “receipt of the paging request” reinforces “downlink
`
`communications”as recited. The office action respectfully contends that “downlink communications”
`
`as recited does not distinguish from “the receipt of the paging request” or “the paging request at $114
`
`of Yamada” as communications in the downlink.
`
`Cc.
`
`As such, the office action respectfully contends that applicant’s remarks/argumentsas cited are
`
`not persuasive since Yamada discloses and reads upon claim 1 elements of applicant’s contention as
`
`referenced herein and disclosed, and the office action relies upon disclosures of Yamada in view of Ji in
`
`combination as presentedin the 35 U.S.C. 103 rejection presented herein (See office action) for the
`
`rejection of the entirety of claim 16.
`
`The office action furthermore adds that applicant’s arguments are directed against the
`
`referencesindividually, and one cannot show non-obviousnessby attacking references individually
`
`wherethe rejections are based on combinations of references used to address the rejection of
`
`applicant’s claims (See /n re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981); In re Merck & Co., 800
`
`F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. Cir. 1986))
`
`Applicant is respectfully directed to the new ground of rejection of Claim 16 presented under 35
`
`U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamada in view of Ji where the disclosure of each and every
`
`limitation of claim 16 as amendedis presented in combination (Note including as an example
`
`representing parallel features in claim 30, 36).
`
`The rejection has been revised and set forth below according to the amendedclaims (see Office
`
`Action).
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 8
`
`Claim Objections
`
`Claims 16, 30, 36 are objected to because of the following informalities:
`
`Claim 16, 30, and similarly Claim 36 recite “downlink communications” in the terms “downlink
`
`13.
`
`A.
`
`communications are made by the basestation” in respective claim preambles, i.e. where the subject
`
`“downlink communications” is recited prior to the terms reciting “configured to” in claim 16 and claim
`
`30, and reciting “comprising” in claim 36, and, furthermore the subject claims subsequently again recite
`
`the terms “downlink communications” in “used for downlink communications”. To avoid any questions
`
`raised about antecedent basis as to the recitations “downlink communications” both before and after
`
`the terms “configured to” and “comprising” as noted, the office action suggests that applicant consider
`
`utilizing a the in front of “downlink communications” recited subsequent to the terms “configured to”
`
`and “comprising” as referenced aboveas in “used for” the “downlink communications”.
`
`Examiner interprets the subject claims listed as best possible. Applicant is requested to review
`
`and address questions raised and verify applicant’s objective for the referred to claim language.
`
`14.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`rejections
`
`set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patentfor a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102,if the differences between the
`
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`
`ordinaryskill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 9
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102
`
`and 103 (or as subject to pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory
`
`basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground ofrejection if the prior art relied upon, and
`
`the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
`
`This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the
`
`examiner presumesthat the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the
`
`effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised
`
`of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effectivefiling dates of each claim that
`
`was not commonly ownedas of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner
`
`to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art
`
`against the later invention.
`
`15.
`
`Claims 16 - 18, 23, 30, 31, 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Yamada etal. (US 8457151 B2), i.e. “Yamada”in view of in view of Ji et al (US 20160013891 A1), i.e. “Ji”.
`
`Regarding Claim 16. (Currently Amended) Yamada teaches: Circuitry for a base station
`
`(YamadaFIG. 31. FIG. 36 Col 34 (In 37-39)... base station 100 is made up of an antenna portion 111, a
`
`radio portion 112, a control portion 113, and a communication IF 114; Col 38 (In 47-60)... A program
`
`operating in the base station device... is a program controlling a CPU, ...driving a computer to implement
`
`functions.... The information handled by these devices is temporarily accumulated in a RAM at the time
`
`of process NOTE: base station made up of a program controlling i.e. a CPU...the program stored on RAM
`
`ROM reads on:Circuitry for a base station )
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 10
`
`in a wireless telecommunications system in which downlink communications are made by the
`
`base station using a radio interface (Yamada FIG. 31, FIG. 36, Col 38 (In 31- 38)... the base station 100
`
`calculates and retains the operating frequency band position of the mobile station 200 from the
`
`subscriber identification information and the available frequency bandwidth of the mobile station 200
`
`(S113) and transmits the packet of the paging request at the operating frequency band position (S114)
`
`NOTE: base station 100 per FIG. 31 and FIG. 36 depicted as in communication with mobile stationi.e.
`
`base station 100... transmits the packet of the paging request at the operating frequency band position
`
`(S114) reads on: in a wireless telecommunications system in which downlink communications are made
`
`by the base station using a radio interface)
`
`that spansa first frequency bandwidth (Yamada — FIG. 31, FIG. 34 (A), FIG. 36, Col 37 (In 17-
`
`18)... NOTE: unique frequency bandwidth of the base stationis i.e. 20 MHz reads on: that spansa first
`
`requency bandwidth )
`
`and supports communications with terminal devices within a plurality of channels which are
`
`narrower than thefirst frequency bandwidth (Yamada — FIG. 31, FIG. 34 (B), FIG. 36, Col 37 (In 21-29,
`
`30-31)... operating band of the mobile station having the 10-MHz bandwidthability has two candidates
`
`(Nos. 0 and 1); the operating band of the mobile station having the 5-MHz bandwidth ability has four
`
`candidates (Nos. 0 to 3); the operating band of the mobile station having the 2.5-MHz bandwidth ability
`
`has eight candidates (Nos. 0 to 7); and the operating band of the mobile station having the 1.25-MHz
`
`bandwidth ability has 16 candidates (Nos. 0 to 15).... classification of the mobile stations having
`
`respective available bandwidths NOTE: i.e. operating band of the mobile station having the 10-MHz
`
`bandwidthability... the 5-MHz bandwidthability ... the 2.5-MHz bandwidth ability ...operating band of
`
`the mobile station having the 1.25-MHz bandwidth ability reads on: and supports communications with
`
`terminal devices..... i.e. 10-MHz bandwidth ability has two candidates...5-MHz bandwidth ability has
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 11
`
`four candidates...2.5-MHz bandwidth ability has eight candidates....1.25-MHz bandwidth has 16
`
`candidates reads on: within a plurality of channels which are narrowerthan the first frequency
`
`bandwidth),
`
`the circuitry configured to: select a channel to be used for downlink communicationsfor a
`
`terminal device from amongtheplurality of channels based on [[the]] an entirety of_an identifier
`
`associated with the terminal device (Yamada FIG. 34 (A) & FIG. 34 (B), FIG. 36; Col 37 (In 33-36, 37-55)
`
`... The operating frequency bandposition of the mobile station is identified by including the candidate
`
`numbersof FIG. 34(A) and IDs of FIG. 34(B) in the location registration request and the paging request...
`
`An algorithm is then proposed that identifies the operating frequency band position from the subscriber
`
`identification information IMSI and the above mobile station classes.... shifted frequency position number
`
`(Ps)=IMSI/Npi modNs(Eq. 28).... lf the subscriber identification information IMSI and the ID indicating
`
`the available frequency bandwidth of the mobile station are includedin the location registration request
`
`and the paging request, the operating frequency band position of the mobile station can beidentified
`
`with the above calculating equations in the base station; FIG. 36, Col 38 (In 31- 38) See above; NOTE: i.e.
`
`per Col 37 (In 33-36, 37-55) the operating frequency band position of the mobile station can be identified
`
`with the above calculating equations in the base station and per Col 38 (In 31- 38)... the base station 100
`
`calculates and retains the operating frequency band position of the mobile station 200 reads on: selecta
`
`channel to be used from the subscriber identification information, wherei.e. and transmits the packet of
`
`the paging requestat the operating frequency band position (S114) reads on: for downlink
`
`communications for a terminal device , where i.e. The operating frequency band position of the mobile
`
`stationis identified by includingi.e. the candidate numbers of FIG. 34(A) reads on: from among the
`
`plurality of channels where per Col 37 (In 21-29, 30-31) 10-MHz bandwidth ability has two candidates
`
`..5-MHz bandwidth ability has four candidates...2.5-MHz bandwidth ability has eight candidates....1.25-
`
`MHz bandwidth has 16 candidates, and wherei.e. the base station 100 calculates and retains the
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 12
`
`operating frequency band position of the mobile station 200 from the subscriber identification
`
`information andi.e. per Col 37 (In 33-36, 37-55) identifies the operating frequency band position from
`
`the subscriber identification information IMSI and...shifted frequency position number (Ps)=IMSI/Npi mod
`
`Ns (Eq. 28) and per Col 38 (In 31- 38)... the base station 100 calculates and retains the operating
`
`frequency bandposition of the mobile station 200 from the subscriber identification information reads
`
`on: based on an entirety of an identifier associated with the terminal device_the entire IMSI is utilized in
`
`the equations referenced)
`
`that is set by an entity other than the base station and the terminal device (Yamada FIG. 36
`
`Col 38 (In 22-30)...the location management device 300 acquires the subscriber identification information
`
`of the destination mobile station 200 of the packet and the available frequency bandwidth and the
`
`location registration area of the mobile station 200 from the location management database and sends
`
`out a paging request including the subscriber identification information (IMSI) and the available
`
`frequency bandwidth of the mobile station to the base station of the location registration area (S112)
`
`NOTE: i.e. the location management device 300 that sends the subscriber identification information
`
`(IMSI) and the available frequency bandwidth of the mobile station reads on: that is set by an entity
`
`other than the base station and the terminal device );
`
`and transmit the downlink communications to the terminal device within the channel Yamada
`
`FIG. 36 & Col 38 (In 31- 38) See above; NOTE: the base station 100 calculates and retains the operating
`
`frequency bandposition of the mobile station 200 from the subscriber identification information, where
`
`ie. and transmits the packet of the paging request at the operating frequency band position (S114) reads
`
`on: and transmit the downlink communications to the terminal device within the channel).
`
`Yamada does not appear to explicitly teach or strongly suggest: the terminal device having
`
`selected the channel to be used for the downlink communications based on the entirety of the
`
`identifier associated with the terminal device independently of the base station
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 13
`
`Ji teaches: the terminal device having selected the channel to be used for the downlink
`
`communications based onthe entirety of the identifier associated with the terminal device
`
`independently of the base station (Yamada — FIG. 3 & 90178.... Step 302: The UE and the eNB
`
`separately determine, according to a preset resource mapping policy, a downlink time-frequency
`
`resource that is corresponding to the UE; 40179.... In this step, downlink feedback information of
`
`different UEs is distinguished according to an uplink time-frequency resource of uplink data sent by each
`
`UE and identity information that is corresponding to each UE, or according to only identity information
`
`that is corresponding to each UE; 90188.... determining, by the eNB, the downlink time-frequency
`
`resource that is corresponding to the UEis: calculating, by the eNB according to the following formula,
`
`the downlink time-frequency resource that is corresponding to the UE: q=imod(rmax), where 90189 q
`
`indicates an identifier of the downlink time-frequency resource that is corresponding to the UE,i
`
`indicates a sequence numberof the identity information that is corresponding to the UE, and rmax
`
`indicates a maximum available quantity of downlink time-frequency resources; 40190
`
`Correspondingly..... the UE also determines, according to the identity information, the downlink time-
`
`frequency resource that is corresponding to the UE......determining, by the UE, the downlink time-
`
`frequency resource that is corresponding to the UEis: calculating, by the UE according to the following
`
`formula, the downlink time-frequency resource that is corresponding to the UE: q=imod(rmax), where
`
`10191 q indicates an identifier of the downlink time-frequency resource....., i indicates a sequence
`
`numberof the identity information that is corresponding to the UE....; NOTE: per 40190i.e.
`
`Correspondingly..... the UE also determines, according to the identity information, the downlink time-
`
`frequency resource that is corresponding to the UE i.e. UE also determines according to the formula, the
`
`downlink time-frequency resource that is corresponding to the UE: q=imod(rmax) reads on: the terminal
`
`device having selected the channel to be used for the downlink communications wherei.e. i indicates a
`
`sequence numberof the identity information that is corresponding to the UE reads on: based on the
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 14
`
`entirety of the identifier associated with the terminal device, where i.e. UE and the eNB separately
`
`determine, according to a preset resource mappingpolicy, a downlink time-frequency resource thatis
`
`corresponding to the UE reads on: independently of the base station, where per 90188 and 900189 eNB
`
`separately selects a channel to be used for downlink communications for a terminal device based upon
`
`the identity information that is corresponding to the UEin parallel utilizing the same formula and UE
`
`identity);
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinaryskill in the art before the effective filing date of
`
`the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Yamada with teachingsofJi, since Ji enables ensuring
`
`that an eNB can successfully receive uplink data sent by the UE, improvingreliability of a
`
`communications system that uses a connectionless data transmission manner (Ji - 700198).
`
`Regarding Claim 17. (Previously Presented) Yamada in view ofJi teaches: The circuitry of claim
`
`16,
`
`furthermore Yamada discloses: wherein the identifier associated with the terminal device that
`
`is set by the entity other than the base station and the terminal device and upon which theselection
`
`of the channel is based comprises an International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) associated with
`
`the terminal device (Yamada FIG. 36 Col 38 (In 22-30) See claim 16; NOTE: the location management
`
`device 300 that sends out a paging requesti.e. including the subscriberidentification information (IMSI)
`
`and the available frequency bandwidth of the mobile station reads on: wherein the identifier associated
`
`with the terminal device that is set by the entity other than the base station and the terminal device and
`
`upon which the selection of the channel is based comprises an International Mobile Subscriber Identity
`
`(IMS!) associated with the terminal device where base station 100 calculates and retains the operating
`
`frequency bandposition of the mobile station 200 from the subscriber identification information).
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/333,029
`Art Unit: 2414
`
`Page 15
`
`Regarding Claim 18. (Previously Presented) Yamada in view ofJi teaches: The circuitry of claim
`
`16,
`
`furthermore Yamada discloses: wherein the channel is determined from a remainder value
`
`obtained by dividing the entirety of the identifier associated with the terminal device thatis set by the
`
`entity other than the basestation and terminal device by a number of the plurality of channels
`
`supported bythe basestation (Yamada FIG. 34 (A) & FIG. 34 (B), FIG. 36; Col 37 (In 33-36, 37-55) See
`
`claim 16 .... number of candidates for shifted frequency position (Ns)=MBnb/Bn(Eq. 27).... shifted
`
`frequency position number(Ps)=IMSI/Npi mod Ns (Eq. 28) NOTE: numberof candidates for shifted
`
`frequency position (Ns) where shifted frequency position number(Ps) = i.e. frequency position number
`
`
`(Ps) reads on: wherein the channel is determined from i.e. IMSI/Npi mod Ns, i.e. mod reads on: a
`
`remainder value obtained bydividing i.e. IMSI/Npi reads on: a numberassociated with the entirety of
`
`the identifier associated with the terminal device that is set by the entity other than the base station and
`
`terminal device i.e. Ns reads on: by a numberof the plurality of channels supported by the base station
`
`).
`
`16,
`
`Regarding Claim 23.