throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`18/197,876
`
`05/16/2023
`
`Atsumi NIWA
`
`6810-842-CON-6
`
`9314
`
`Sheridan Ross P.C.
`Bradley M. Knepper
`1560 Broadway
`Suite 1200
`Denver, CO 80202
`
`CAMARGO, MARLYS.B.
`
`Pana
`
`2638
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`12/30/2024
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`edocket @sheridanross.com
`
`sony @sheridanross.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-14 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`CL] Claim(s)__is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-14 is/are rejected.
`(] Claim(s)__ is/are objectedto.
`C] Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)( The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filed on 05/16/2023 is/are: a)[¥) accepted or b)(.) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)(¥) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`_—_c)L) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)Y) All
`1.1) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.{v] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. 15/303645.
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`*“ See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20241220
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`18/197,876
`NIWAet al.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF)StatusExaminer
`MARLY S CAMARGO
`2638
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORYPERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensionsof time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 05/16/2023.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)() This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)(2) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/197,876
`Art Unit: 2638
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`underthe first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`2.
`
`This is the initial Office Action based on the application filed 05/16/2023. This
`
`application is a Continuation of case 17/948908 (now US 11,696,053 B2, allowed on
`
`07/04/2023), which is a continuation of case 17/119084 (now US 11,483,509 B2, allowed
`
`on 10/25/2022), which is a continuation of case 16/840077 (now US 10,911,707 B2,
`
`allowed on 02/02/2021), which is a continuation of application 16/559795 (now US
`
`10,659,716 B2, allowed on 01/02/2020), which is a continuation of application 15/987363
`
`(now US 10,432,884 B2, allowed on 10/01/2019), which is a continuation of application
`
`15/313645 (now US 10,021,335 B2, allowed on 07/10/2018) The Examiner acknowledges
`
`the following:
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`Claims 1 — 14 werefile by Applicant.
`
`The drawings filed on 05/16/2023 are accepted by the Examiner.
`
`Currently claims 1
`
`-— 14 are pending and they are being considered for
`
`examination.
`
`Information Disclosure Statement
`
`6.
`
`The four IDS documentfiled on 05/16/2023 is acknowledged by the Examiner.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/197,876
`Art Unit: 2638
`
`Page 3
`
`Priority
`
`7.
`
`Foreign priority date is claimed as the earliest 06/02/2014 referring to a PCT
`
`application PCT/JP2015/002549 which is based on the Japanese application documents
`
`JP-2014-114143 (with priority date 06/02/2014) and JP-2014-230000, JP-2014-230001
`
`and JP-2014-230002 (with priority date 11/12/2014). Certified copies were filed to the
`
`office with the great great-grandparent application patent application 15/313645, on
`
`11/23/2016.
`
`Double Patenting
`
`8.
`
`A rejection based on double patenting of the “sarne invention” type fincis its support
`
`in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any
`
`new and useful orocess... may obtain a pateni therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the
`
`term: “same invention,”
`
`in this coniext, means an invention drawn ta identical subject
`
`matter. See Milerv. Eagle Mig. Co., 151 LLS. 166 (1884): In re Yooel, 422 F.2d 438, 164
`
`USPO 619 (GCPA 1970): in re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (COPA 1957}.
`
`A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101 } double patenting reiection can be overcorne by
`
`canceling or amending the claims thal are direcied to the same invention so they are ne
`
`longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal cisclaimer cannot overcome a double
`
`patenting refection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101.
`
`9.
`
`Claims 1 — 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention
`
`as that of claims 1 — 14 of parent U.S. patent 11,696,053 B2. This is a statutory double
`
`patenting rejection.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/197,876
`Art Unit: 2638
`
`Page 4
`
`Conclusion
`
`10.
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to
`
`applicant's disclosure.
`
`1. A. Niwa et al., US 11,696,053 B2 —- tis corresponds to the parent of the instant
`
`application and it represents the same invention (See the double patent rejection for more
`
`details).
`
`11.—Anyinquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`Contact
`
`examiner should be directed to MARLY CAMARGO whosetelephone numberis
`
`(571)270-3729. The examiner can normally be reached on 6:00AM - 10PM, M-F, EST.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached on (571)272-7372. The fax phone numberfor the
`
`organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval
`
`(PAIR) system.
`
`Status information for published
`
`applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information
`
`for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information
`
`about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on
`
`accessto the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-
`
`217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/197,876
`Art Unit: 2638
`
`Page 5
`
`Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN
`
`USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/MARLY S CAMARGO/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2638
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket