`
`Thetitle and specification is amended as follows:
`
`BOFTFOM-OF A MULTI-LEAD ELECTROCARDIOGRAM RECORDER
`
`of which the following is a specification, reference being made to the accompanying drawings,
`
`forming a part thereof.
`
`FIG.1 is a front perspective view of a-wireless-stetheseepe-a multi-lead
`
`electrocardiogram recorder in accordance with our new and ornamental design;
`
`FIG.2 is a front view thereof;
`
`FIG.3 is a rear view thereof:
`
`FIG.41saleft side view thereof,
`
`FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof;
`
`FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof;
`
`FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof, wherein the broken lines form no part of the
`
`claimed design.
`
`
`
`The claim is amendedas follows:
`
`Weclaim: The ornamental design for BOFFOM-OFA MULTI-LEAD
`
`ELECTROCARDIOGRAM RECORDER asshownand described.
`
`
`
`REMARKS
`
`The Examineris thanked for the thorough examination of the present application. The
`
`Office Action, however, tentatively reject the claim. In response, Applicant submits the
`
`foregoing amendments andthe following remarks. Applicant respectfully requests
`
`reconsideration of these rejections for at least the following reasons.
`
`Present Status of Application
`
`The claim, specification, and FIG. 7 is amended in this submission.
`
`Specification
`
`The specification has been amendedaccording to suggestions given by the examiner in
`
`the Office Action.
`
`Thetitle “Bottom of multi-lead electrocardiogram recorder” has been amended to “A
`
`multi-lead electrocardiogram recorder’, andthetitle in the first figure description has been
`
`amendedaccordingly.
`
`Claim rejections (112
`
`The claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112 (a) and (b) or 35 U.S.C. § 112 (pre-AIA),
`
`first and second paragraphs.
`
`Thetitle “Bottom of multi-lead electrocardiogram recorder” is directed to less than what
`
`is being claimed andtherefore is indefinite. As stated above, the title has been amended to “A
`
`multi-lead electrocardiogram recorder’. This issue has been overcome.
`
`
`
`The depths, spatial positions and appearance of the elements shownin Fig. 7 identified by
`
`the darkened coloring below are unclear from the limited views in which they appear.
`
`To overcomethis issue, the indefinite elements have been reducedto broken lines and
`
`removedfrom the claim, as suggested by the examiner. Furthermore, the description “wherein
`
`the broken lines form no part of the claimed design” has been addedto the specification, to
`
`part in Fig. 7.
`
`describe the non-claimed
`
`(Amended bottom portion of Fig. 7)
`
`Applicant submits that the application is now in condition for allowance.
`
`INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS
`
`Pursuant to MPEP 502.03: “Recognizing that Internet communicationsare not secure,I
`
`hereby authorize the USPTO to communicate with me concerning any subject matter of this
`
`application by electronic mail. I understand that a copy of these communications will be made of
`
`record in the applicationfile.”
`
`
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`All the stated groundsof rejection have been properly traversed and/or rendered moot.
`
`Applicant therefore respectfully requests that the Examinerreconsiderall presently pending
`
`rejections and that they be withdrawn.
`
`It is believed that a full and complete response has been made to the Office Action, and
`
`that as such, the Examineris respectfully requested to send the application to Issue.
`
`Any amendments madeherein are made withoutprejudice, disclaimer, or waiver of the
`
`subject matter previously embodiedin the claims, or Applicant’s right to pursue other
`
`embodiments supported by the specification.
`
`Should the Examinerfeel that further discussion of the application and the Amendmentis
`
`conducive to prosecution and allowance thereof, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned
`
`by phone (678-483-8899) or email (dan.mcclure@mqrlaw.com).
`
`Nofeeis believed to be due in connection with this submission.
`
`If, however, any fee is
`
`believed to be due, you are hereby authorized to charge any such fee to deposit account No. 50-
`
`5954.
`
`Customer No. 109673
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Daniel R. McClure/
`By:
`Daniel R. McClure
`Registration No. 38,962
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
