throbber
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`APPLICANT
`2:.-“z"a;'i=:.;._ ;'.'i»1E:£: 1' -.’;-“=;.F1.EI.. mr::.
`
`_
`_
`_ H D
`_>
`‘v‘l:.¥..f l 1.3!-‘:3 l3\’l';Z!I;'1ClF‘»l5.".'3 I i.,.li"f
`C ‘T "r"l.- I .33 I3}
`ADD
`hi ..
`1511;. ;_:,.., E 3..., .f,- .5;
`E-_. 1ak__2_ _ V 550 1:: Q 1 '3' _F 1,.
`.?..’::_‘__V1 L”
`i.
`.«..
`'li¢..”¢‘.’.i
`ml ,5.
`.4.
`1
`i:.~.2 En»--9.41»:
`L0:-5.
`i’i}:-‘pair:-;=.'
`rt-=. _,
`i_'j:.€t
`'§.:i;.{uzi
`
`_ ._
`
`ex
`
`ACILON NO.
`in _L
`
`.'.‘:'-
`
`‘
`
`PAPER "°~
`
`ADDRESS:
`Commissioner of Patents
`""1 Tfldfmlrks
`Washington. D.C. 20231
`It no fees are enclosed, the address
`should Include the words “Box 51..
`Please provide in all correspondence:
`
`1. Filing date, serial number, mark, and
`applicant's name.
`
`2. Mailing date of this Oflice action.
`
`FORM PTO-1525 (5-90)
`
`u.s. DEPT. or com
`
`M‘ PAT’ 8‘ TM OFFICE
`
`3. Your telephone number and ZIP code.
`
`4. Examining nttomey's name and law omce
`number.
`
`A proper response to this Office Action must be received within six months of the
`mailing date of the Office Action in order to avoid ABANDONMENT. For your
`convenience and to ensure proper handling ofyour response, a label has been enclosed.
`Please attach it to the upper right comer ofyour response. If the label is not enclosed, print
`or type the Trademark L#a_w_0gfice ]jo_.,_Serial IQ, and IQ]; in the upper right corner of
`your response.
`
`The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the
`. following.
`
`LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`
`The examining attorney refuses registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C.
`Section 1052(d), because the applicant's mark, when used on the identified goods, is likely to
`be confused with the registered mark in U.S. Registration No. 1,769,783. TIVIEP section
`1207. See the enclosed registration.
`
`Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act bars registration where a mark so resembles a registered
`mark, that it is likely, when applied to the goods, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake or
`to deceive. TMEP section 1207.01. The Court in In re E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 476
`F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973), listed the principal factors to consider in
`determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion. Among these factors are the
`similarity of the marks as to appearance, sound, meaning and commercialimpression and the
`
`

`
`2
`
`similarity of the goods. The overriding concern is to prevent buyer confusion as to the source
`of the goods. Miss Universe, Inc. v. Miss Teen U'.S.A., Inc., 209 USPQ 698 (N.D. Ga. 1980).
`Therefore, any doubt as to the existence of a likelihood of confusion must be resolved in
`favor of the registrant. Lone Star Mfg. Co. v. Bill Beasley, Inc., 498 F.2d 906, 182 USPQ
`368 (CCPA 1974).
`.
`
`"VECTOR," the dominant word in the applicant's proposed mark, comprises the entire
`registered mark. Since both marks are applied to computer programs for use in the banking
`industry, confusion as to source is likely.
`
`If the applicant chooses to respond to the refusal to register, the applicant must also respond
`to the following informality.
`
`DRAWING
`
`The drawing is not acceptable because the mark is not typed entirely in capital letters. 37
`C.F.R. Section 2.51(e); TMEP section 807.08. The applicant must submit a new drawing.
`the applicant wishes to register the typed version of the mark, the applicant must submit a
`drawing on which the mark is typed entirely in capital letters.
`If the applicant intends to
`show the mark in special form, the applicant must submit an acceptable special-form drawing.
`37 C.F.R. Sections 2.51 and 2.52.
`
`If
`
`The requirements for a special-form drawing, in addition to the heading, are as follows.
`
`. (1) The drawing must appear in black and white; no color is permitted.
`
`(2) Every line and letter must be black and clear.
`
`(3) The use of gray to indicate shading is ‘unacceptable.
`
`(4) The lining must not be too fine or too close together.
`
`(5) The preferred size of the area in which the mark is displayed is 2 1/2 inches (6.1
`cm.) high and 2 1/2 inches (6.1 cm.) wide.
`In no case may it be larger than 4 inches
`(10.3 cm.) high or 4 inches (10.3 cm.) wide.
`
`(6) If the reduction of the mark to the required size renders any details illegible, the
`applicant may insert a statement in the application to describe the mark and these
`details.
`
`37 C.F.R. ‘Sections 2.51 and 2.52; TMEP section 807.05. The Office will enforce these
`drawing requirements strictly. TMEP section 807.
`_
`
`Sue Carruthers
`
`'
`
`'
`
`Trademark Attorney
`Law Office 7
`
`703-308-9107, ext. 32
`
`

`
`*** User: EX415369 *** Serial Number: 74205219 ***
`
`Word Mark
`VECTOR
`
`Goods/Services
`IC 009; US 038; G & S: computer programs for use in the banking industry
`and instruction and user manuals sold therewith; FIRST USE: 1976.06.00;
`FIRST USE IN COMERCE: 1976.06.00
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`(1) TYPED DRAWING
`
`Serial Number
`74—205219
`
`Filing Date
`1991.09.20
`
`Registration Number
`1769783
`
`Registration Date
`1993.05.11
`
`Owner Name/Address
`INC. CORPORATION DELAWARE 15301 North Dallas
`(REGISTRANT) DIRECTIONS,
`Parkway Suite 400-LB 23 Dallas TEXAS 752484689
`
`Type of Mark
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`*** Search:
`
`3 *** Document Number: 40 ***

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket