PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
`
`OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017)
`
`Response to Office Action
`
`The table below presents the data as entered.
`
`Input Field
`
`Entered
`
`SERIAL NUMBER
`
`85256046
`
`LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED
`
`LAW OFFICE 113
`
`MARK SECTION
`
`MARK
`
`http://tess2.uspto.gov/ImageAgent/ImageAgentProxy?getImage=85256046
`
`LITERAL ELEMENT
`
`RX PROFILER
`
`STANDARD CHARACTERS
`
`USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`MARK STATEMENT
`
`The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color.
`
`ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION
`
`MISCELLANEOUS STATEMENT
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) MISCELLANEOUS FILE NAME(S)
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)ORIGINAL PDF FILE
`
`mis-2052100254-122958273_._NEW__withdrawing_AU___suspension_request_for_RX_Profiler.pdf
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(1 page)
`
`SIGNATURE SECTION
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\852\560\85256046\xml5\ROA0002.JPG
`
`RESPONSE SIGNATURE
`
`/Brian Petrequin/
`
`SIGNATORY'S NAME
`
`Brian L. Petrequin, Esq.
`
`SIGNATORY'S POSITION
`
`Attorney of Record
`
`DATE SIGNED
`
`AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
`
`06/20/2012
`
`YES
`
`FILING INFORMATION SECTION
`
`SUBMIT DATE
`
`Wed Jun 20 12:37:41 EDT 2012
`
`USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.X.XXX-2
`0120620123741902480-85256
`046-490447498c42a47ce312b
`ef6c7739fef996-N/A-N/A-20
`120620122958273194
`
`TEAS STAMP
`
`PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
`
`OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017)
`
`To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
`
`Response to Office Action
`
`

`

`Application serial no. 85256046(cid:160)RX PROFILER(Standard Characters, see
`http://tess2.uspto.gov/ImageAgent/ImageAgentProxy?getImage=85256046) has been amended as follows:
`
`ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS
`Miscellaneous Statement
`
`Original PDF file:
`mis-2052100254-122958273_._NEW__withdrawing_AU___suspension_request_for_RX_Profiler.pdf
`Converted PDF file(s) ( 1 page)
`Miscellaneous File1
`
`SIGNATURE(S)
`Response Signature
`Signature: /Brian Petrequin/(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)Date: 06/20/2012
`Signatory's Name: Brian L. Petrequin, Esq.
`Signatory's Position: Attorney of Record
`
`The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which
`includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the applicant's attorney or an
`associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not
`currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant in this matter: (1) the applicant has filed or is concurrently
`filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to
`withdraw; (3) the applicant has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the applicant's appointed U.S. attorney or
`Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.
`
`Serial Number: 85256046
`Internet Transmission Date: Wed Jun 20 12:37:41 EDT 2012
`TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.X.XXX-2012062012374190
`2480-85256046-490447498c42a47ce312bef6c7
`739fef996-N/A-N/A-20120620122958273194
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`

`RX PROFILER
`Serial No(s).
`8 52 5 6046
`
`RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION AND
`
`REQUEST FOR SUSPENSION OF APPLICATION
`
`INTRODUCTION.
`
`Applicant submits its response to the office action, dated June 5, 2012 (“Office Action”),
`regarding the allegation of use, for Applicant’s mark RX PROFILER (Serial No. 85256046)
`(“ pplicant’s Mar ”) from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“E”) Examining
`Attorney. Prior to this response, but subsequent to the issuance of the PTO of this Office Action,
`Applicant
`submitted (i) a request
`for
`reconsideration on June 6, 2012 (“Request
`for
`Reconsideration”) with respect to the final office action dated January 3, 2012 (“Final Office
`Action”) responding to a §2(e)(l) descriptiveness refusal and (ii) pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.67 and
`TMEP §716, a request that the processing of its application be suspended pending the disposition
`of a federal court proceeding involving the pending application cited in the Final Office Action.
`
`II.
`
`RESPONSE TO SPECIMEN REFUSAL
`
`In response to the PTO’s refusal to accept Applicant’s specimens in its allegation of use,
`the Applicant withdraws its amendment to allege use.
`
`III.
`
`RES !UEST FOR SUSPENSION UNTIL COURT PROCEEDING DISPOSITION &
`§2§ e )3 1 I DESCRIPTIVE REFUSAL.
`
`Applicant maintains its request for suspension of the pending application and preliminary
`response to the §2(e)(1) descriptiveness refusal set forth in the Request for Reconsideration.
`
`In the event that the PTO Examining Attorney determines that he/she will not issue the
`suspension requested in the Request for Reconsideration,
`it is respectfully requested that the
`Examining Attorney issue an Examiner’s Subsequent Final Refusal as a result of the new
`evidence presented in the Request for Reconsideration (i.e., the new evidence being the federal
`court proceeding that could result in a legal decisions squarely addressing the sole issue in
`Applicant’s application) as required by TMEP §7l5.03(b).
`
`IV.
`
`CONCLUSION.
`
`Having responded to all open items with respect to Applicant’s application to register its
`mark, Applicant respectfully requests that Applicant's application to register its mark now be
`suspended pending the disposition of the court proceeding referred to in the Request for
`Reconsideration and withdraws its allegation of use.
`
`5618209—1
`
`