throbber
Commissioner for Trademarks
`PO. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`www.uspto.gov
`
`Date: December 16, 2015
`
`Charles N. Quinn
`Fox Rothschild LLP
`
`Eagleview Corporate Center
`747 Constitution Dr. Ste 100
`
`Exton, PA 19341
`
`RE: Request to Extend Time to File Petition to the Director
`Opposition Nos. 91215208, 91215212, 91215216,
`91215246, 91215247, and 91215415
`Marks: M and design, Me (stylized)
`
`Dear Mr. Quinn,
`
`This letter acknowledges receipt on May 1, 2015 of your request, filed on behalf
`of Empire Resort, Inc. (“Applicant”), “for an extension of time to petition the
`Director” to review an order dated April 1, 2015 issued by the Trademark Trial
`and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). The request
`is premature and will not be
`considered.
`
`In its April 1, 2015 order, the TTAB granted LVGV, LLC’s “Opposer”) motion
`to consolidate the above identified proceeding and denied Applicant’s motions
`for judgment on the pleadings.
`
`On May 1, 2015, Applicant filed with the Director a request to extend its time
`to file a petition based on “a perceived procedural impropriety in the Board’s
`handling” of the motions addressed in the order. On the same day, Applicant
`filed motions for reconsideration of the TTAB’s April 1, 2015 order directed
`separately to the determination to consolidate and to the determination
`denying Applicant’s motions for judgment on the pleadings.
`
`Any request for reconsideration of an order or decision issued on a motion must
`be filed within one month from the date of the order or decision. Applicant’s
`motions for reconsideration are timely-filed. 37 C.F.R. § 2.127(b); TBMP § 518
`(2015).
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §2 and 37 C.F.R. §2.146(a)(3), the Director may invoke
`supervisory authority in appropriate circumstances. The Director will reverse
`
`

`

`an interlocutory order issued by the TTAB in an inter partes proceeding upon a
`showing of clear error or abuse of discretion. Jonergin Co. Inc. v. Jonergin
`Vermont Inc., 222 USPQ 337 (Comm'r Pats. 1983); Riko Enterprises, Inc. v.
`Lindsley, 198 USPQ 480 (Comm'r Pats. 1977). In this case, there has been no
`determination by the TTAB on the motions for reconsideration of the April 1,
`2015 order. Therefore, App]_icant’s May 1, 2015 request to extend its time to file
`a petition to the Director is premature.
`
`resumption of
`The assigned interlocutory attorney will be notified for
`proceedings with respect to Applicant’s motions for reconsideration.
`
`/Cheryl Butlerl
`
`Cheryl Butler
`Senior Counsel
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`
`CC:
`
`Hare K Jacobs
`
`Ballard Spahr LLP
`1735 Market St., 51st Fl
`Philadelphia, PA 19103-7599
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket